General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

BMR, Exercise, 'Normal' Activity.

Started by Paul Aspinall · · Last activity · 7 posts · 302 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
26 February 2005
Last activity
26 February 2005
Original author
Paul Aspinall
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
302
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Can anyone clarify this for me please....

    I understand that BMR is Base Metabolic Rate, which is basically the number
    of calories required to 'live' assuming no other activity, ie.... if you
    stop in bed all day...

    On top of this, you will have exercise (due to workouts), and 'normal'
    activity calories burned (ie. those burned, which are not related to
    'workout' but due to normal day-to-day activity)

    So.... Calories burned = BMR + 'normal activity calories' + exercise or
    workout calories

    Is this correct?

    Is there a name for BMR + 'normal activity calories'???

    Thanks

  2. Paul Aspinall said:

    Can anyone clarify this for me please....

    I understand that BMR is Base Metabolic Rate, which is basically the number
    of calories required to 'live' assuming no other activity, ie.... if you
    stop in bed all day...

    On top of this, you will have exercise (due to workouts), and 'normal'
    activity calories burned (ie. those burned, which are not related to
    'workout' but due to normal day-to-day activity)

    So.... Calories burned = BMR + 'normal activity calories' + exercise or
    workout calories

    Is this correct?

    pretty much, yes.

    but keep in mind that your body isn't a bomb calorimeter, and that all
    the numbers you get from various 'calories burned' calculators are just
    estimates. they're a good guide, but they're not exact.

  3. Yes, but it is easy to overestimate calories burned by activity.

    May I suggest using Fitday to measure your intake and then use your
    weightloss rate to calculate your burn rate. This should give you a number
    that can be used to estimate what Fitday intake you should have for a given
    desired future loss rate.

    "Paul Aspinall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Can anyone clarify this for me please....

    I understand that BMR is Base Metabolic Rate, which is basically the


    number

    Quoted message said:

    of calories required to 'live' assuming no other activity, ie.... if you
    stop in bed all day...

    On top of this, you will have exercise (due to workouts), and 'normal'
    activity calories burned (ie. those burned, which are not related to
    'workout' but due to normal day-to-day activity)

    So.... Calories burned = BMR + 'normal activity calories' + exercise or
    workout calories

    Is this correct?

    Is there a name for BMR + 'normal activity calories'???

    Thanks

  4. Just don't rely on FitDay's interpretation of calories burned for any of
    the activities it lists. They are grossly over estimated. FitDay does
    seem to calculate the BMR correctly, though, but that's it.

    Cubit said:

    Yes, but it is easy to overestimate calories burned by activity.

    May I suggest using Fitday to measure your intake and then use your
    weightloss rate to calculate your burn rate. This should give you a number
    that can be used to estimate what Fitday intake you should have for a given
    desired future loss rate.

    -----
    Bev

  5. To make my Fitday burn rate come out where I thought it should be, I had to
    make a custom rate. Even "sedentary" was too high.

    "Bev-Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Just don't rely on FitDay's interpretation of calories burned for any of
    the activities it lists. They are grossly over estimated. FitDay does
    seem to calculate the BMR correctly, though, but that's it.

    Cubit said:

    Yes, but it is easy to overestimate calories burned by activity.

    May I suggest using Fitday to measure your intake and then use your
    weightloss rate to calculate your burn rate. This should give you a


    number

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that can be used to estimate what Fitday intake you should have for a


    given

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    desired future loss rate.

    -----
    Bev

  6. Cubit said:

    Yes, but it is easy to overestimate calories burned by activity.

    I would concur with that. I cycled 130km today. My HRM claimed I'd
    burned in the order of 6,000 calories - but I would really doubt that
    amount; probably half that would have been more reasonable.

    The HRM can only make a guess based on my HR, weight and age.

    --
    Succorso

  7. I think whatever you actually use, as opposed to what you would have used had
    you stayed in bed all day, is called "active caloric rate" or "active metabolic
    rate".

    Paul Aspinall said:

    Can anyone clarify this for me please....

    I understand that BMR is Base Metabolic Rate, which is basically the number
    of calories required to 'live' assuming no other activity, ie.... if you
    stop in bed all day...

    On top of this, you will have exercise (due to workouts), and 'normal'
    activity calories burned (ie. those burned, which are not related to
    'workout' but due to normal day-to-day activity)

    So.... Calories burned = BMR + 'normal activity calories' + exercise or
    workout calories

    Is this correct?

    Is there a name for BMR + 'normal activity calories'???

    Thanks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.