General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Blocking Cortisol???

Started by OmManiPadmeOmelet · · Last activity · 83 posts · 3,342 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
14 May 2005
Last activity
23 May 2005
Original author
OmManiPadmeOmelet
Posts
83
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,342
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–60 of 83
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    JMW said:
    DZ said:


    As the night grew upon us, some became overpowered by the mighty plant
    but we knew everything is fine as the surroundings are always
    well-protected -

    http://home.nc.rr.com/netsink/Surr.jpg

    The flag is interesting. Apparently Soviet Navy, but the emblem is
    unfamiliar. I managed to find it on the Russian Navy web site, but
    naturally, I can't read the caption.

    Nothing sinister, it's merely the Hydrographic and Oceanography branch
    of the Russian Navy.

    Nothing sinister, eh, Comrade? SPY SHIPS!!!

    David

  2. David Cohen said:


    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    JMW said:

    DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >As the night grew upon us, some became overpowered by the mighty plant
    >but we knew everything is fine as the surroundings are always
    >well-protected -
    >
    >http://home.nc.rr.com/netsink/Surr.jpg

    The flag is interesting. Apparently Soviet Navy, but the emblem is
    unfamiliar. I managed to find it on the Russian Navy web site, but
    naturally, I can't read the caption.

    Nothing sinister, it's merely the Hydrographic and Oceanography branch
    of the Russian Navy.

    Nothing sinister, eh, Comrade? SPY SHIPS!!!

    That was the Russian 'fishing fleet'!! ;o)

  3. "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>As the night grew upon us, some became overpowered by the mighty plant
    >>but we knew everything is fine as the surroundings are always
    >>well-protected -
    >>
    >>http://home.nc.rr.com/netsink/Surr.jpg
    >
    >The flag is interesting. Apparently Soviet Navy, but the emblem is
    >unfamiliar. I managed to find it on the Russian Navy web site, but
    >naturally, I can't read the caption.

    Nothing sinister, it's merely the Hydrographic and Oceanography branch
    of the Russian Navy.

    Nothing sinister, eh, Comrade? SPY SHIPS!!!

    That was the Russian 'fishing fleet'!! ;o)

    Oh. Well, what secret, world domination, commie pinko subversive missions
    did the "Hydrographic and Oceanography branch of the Russian Navy" take part
    in? Brain transplants between sea urchins and Nova Scotians?

    David

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    WillBrink said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mr-Natural-Health said:

    WillBrink wrote:
    > > WillBrink is a muscle bound jock who does not have a clue about
    > > science.
    >
    > Really? 3 years of chemistry and other sciences and I know nothing?

    So, you never finished your 4 year program in science?

    You have my condolences. 🙁

    Don't underesimate Will Brink John.

    Dude, why would you respond to this person in a serious manner? I only
    responded to it for others who might be under the impression (falsely by
    a person with no science background at all, and by his own admission had
    to have all his teeth removed due to be in such poor shape) that ginseng
    has been shown conclusively to lower cortisol, when it has not. Don¹t
    feed the trolls.

    Sorry....... ;-)
    I'm not totally familiar with Gohde, but I'm learning fast!
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    joanne said:
    David Cohen said:

    You might want to rethink advising someone with ADD to
    discontinue their physician-prescribed medication.

    I didnt say to discontinue it [censored]. I said to 'rethink' it and find
    out if all his other supplemention goes in tune with it. Does this same
    doctor know what else he takes on a regular basis? Does he monitor all
    his blood levels regularly? Conflict of prescribed medications with
    over the counter supplementing can be a serious problem.

    I talk to my doctor. She is an Endocrinologist and yes, she knows what
    else I take.

    And I run my own blood levels of Magnesium and Thyroid hormones
    regularly and supply her with the information...

    As much as I dislike taking stimulants, she highly recommended the
    Adderall and it's drastically improved my life. I get more done, my
    concentration at work has improved and it's easier live a normal life.
    She was right about using it.

    Everything was going smoothly until I started working split shifts! It
    is the ONLY factor that has changed.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Which part of "Doc says I have a genetic renal tubule defect
    which causes me to lose magnesium at an abnormal rate" do you
    not understand? Maybe we can find a cartoon website with lots
    of pictures to help you.

    Put down your pedophile comics, get your hand out of your crotch, and
    take a comprehension reading course you twit. I'm quite aware he said
    he had a defect that he needs more magnesium than the average person,
    BUT can he not get more magnesium in real foods instead of it all in a
    pill form? How does he monitor how much magnesium he takes or even
    needs? He just said he takes 'lots' which if he takes too much will
    cause diarrea which will in turn deplete his system of all the extra
    vitamins he is taking.

    David is correct dear. And, for your info., the magnesium you can get in
    "real" foods can still cause loose bowels. Supplementing it in a pill is
    easier and, in fact, is LESS likely to cause diarrhea. Foods highest in
    natural Magnesium are dark green leafy greens such as spinach and chard.
    I'd have to consume truckloads of those to get the magnesium that I need.

    Excess fiber from excess leafy greens will also cause diarrhea.

    I've had the low magnesium problem for years. Do you think I've not
    taken all factors into consideration and learned to deal with them? I
    even know my own symptoms when my levels get low. Numbness and tingling
    in my arms and hands, light headedness and a heart rate of about 130 bpm.

    I vary the amount of Mag I take per day based on how I feel. 1,200 mg.
    per day usually does it but if I pig out on the fresh swiss chard I grow
    in my garden, I cut back for that day. I take more if I start
    experiencing symtoms.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    You are SUCH a blithering idiot. How have you avoided suicide?

    Has your [censored] grown a centimeter by mouthing off now? Oh no, that cant
    be right ..that would imply that you even have one!

    joanne

    Joanne, while I appreciate you trying to help, there is a time and place
    for "allopathic" remedies and treatments. There are other meds the doc
    would be getting me to take as well, but she and I both know the less,
    the better so we go with the minimum of what I need for good physical
    and mental health and she does not push.

    She is excellent and more than willing for me to stick with nutritional
    therapy wherever possible.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  6. David Cohen said:

    You are SUCH a blithering idiot. How have you avoided suicide?

    Ah!, another bad attitude scientist with the personality of a
    constipated wort hog. 🙁

    Since you seem to be talking to yourself, David. Please tell us how
    have you avoided suicide? Having a bad day? Or, is this just your
    normal nasty self?

    Oh! I know the answer. You owe your life to the prescription
    medications you shrink has put you on. You know, the ones that keep
    you from killing people.

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Go drop dead, and see if I care. 🙂

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    David Cohen said:

    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote
    > JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>DZ <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>As the night grew upon us, some became overpowered by the mighty plant
    >>>but we knew everything is fine as the surroundings are always
    >>>well-protected -
    >>>
    >>>http://home.nc.rr.com/netsink/Surr.jpg
    >>
    >>The flag is interesting. Apparently Soviet Navy, but the emblem is
    >>unfamiliar. I managed to find it on the Russian Navy web site, but
    >>naturally, I can't read the caption.
    >
    > Nothing sinister, it's merely the Hydrographic and Oceanography branch
    > of the Russian Navy.

    Nothing sinister, eh, Comrade? SPY SHIPS!!!

    That was the Russian 'fishing fleet'!! ;o)

    Oh. Well, what secret, world domination, commie pinko subversive missions
    did the "Hydrographic and Oceanography branch of the Russian Navy" take part
    in? Brain transplants between sea urchins and Nova Scotians?

    To make the Nova Scotain's smarter?

    Quoted message said:


    David

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Sorry....... ;-)
    I'm not totally familiar with Gohde, but I'm learning fast!

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition. It's been over run
    bu nuts and idiots. It's the type of forum that needs to be moderated.
    It's too bad, a real science based nutrition news group would be great.

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    DZ said:
    WillBrink said:
    DZ said:

    WillBrink <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition.

    There is something about that group.

    Yes, it's full of [censored], which is too bad.

    Quoted message said:

    HIV has nothing to do with AIDS,
    "E" in EPA's is conspiracy created by drug companies, raw tuna will
    purge Alzheimer's amyloid plaques...

    Or that there is no such a thing as an EFA.

    While insisting that "Fatty" should be spelled as "Phatty" (so the
    correct spelling is "EPA"😉 I'd like to take this opportunity to point
    out that putting back sci.med.nutrition wasn't particularly nice of
    you, Will.

    And I thought your removing it was in bad taste, like wispering behind
    the retarded kids back.

    Quoted message said:

    It's like suggesting to a woman that dress makes her
    posterior look phat (even if it does).

    Better then saying it behind her back, fat as it is!

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sometimes two people would argue point A vs. point B, and say A is
    correct. Nevertheless arguments of the person arguing for A would
    likely be about just as crazy:

    "The earth is round because the voices in my head told me so."

    Yup, sounds like sci (where there is no sci) med.nutrition

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  10. DZ said:
    WillBrink said:

    OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition.

    There is something about that group. HIV has nothing to do with AIDS,
    "E" in EPA's is conspiracy created by drug companies, raw tuna will
    purge Alzheimer's amyloid plaques...

    Sometimes two people would argue point A vs. point B, and say A is
    correct. Nevertheless arguments of the person arguing for A would
    likely be about just as crazy:

    "The earth is round because the voices in my head told me so."

    When Gohde's teeth rotted out, the voices in his head became a lot
    clearer. Maybe he should supplement his diet with a little Jimson
    weed.
    --

    JMW
    http://www.rustyiron.net

  11. WillBrink said:

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition. It's been over


    run

    Quoted message said:

    bu nuts and idiots. It's the type of forum that needs to be


    moderated.

    Quoted message said:

    It's too bad, a real science based nutrition news group would be


    great.

    What is your problem, Dork?

    I have two groups of my own: One in Yahoo and the other is in Google.
    Nobody is stopping the big mouth WillBrink, the muscle bound Geek, from
    doing anything.

    Just thought that you might want to know. 🙂

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    WillBrink said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Sorry....... ;-)
    I'm not totally familiar with Gohde, but I'm learning fast!

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition. It's been over run
    bu nuts and idiots. It's the type of forum that needs to be moderated.
    It's too bad, a real science based nutrition news group would be great.

    Well, invasion is always possible. ;-)

    It is also possible to find a few gems amoungst the pebbles....

    Being a big believer in "nutritional" therapy and alternative health
    care, I'll probably reserve judgement overall until I have been here
    awhile and will probably drop back to lurking.

    I know that modern medicine and common sense must be balanced, along
    with balanced nutrition.

    I talked to my Dr. tonight about the issue finally and here was her
    advice as she agreed that an increase in Cortisol was the most likely
    problem:

    Cut carbs (I've already done that)
    Cut calories if possible, (but I'm already at 1,000 to 1,200 per day so
    that's probably unwise)
    Increase exercize. Probably my only option. I've just got to burn more
    calories somehow!

    I've considered fasting for a week maybe. I know I can do that, but only
    if I get desperate and I'm getting close! :-P Either that or lack of
    sleep is messing with my brain. <lol>

    My work schedule continues to suck. I worked a swing tonight, then I am
    working two gravyard shifts the next to days, one day off, another
    swing, then two days on 12 hour graveyard shifts! Then another day off
    followed by 4 swings.

    This is probably going to continue for the next 2 months until we can
    train another night person.

    <sigh>
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  13. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    WillBrink said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    DZ said:
    WillBrink said:

    OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition.

    There is something about that group.

    Yes, it's full of [censored], which is too bad.

    Quoted message said:

    HIV has nothing to do with AIDS,
    "E" in EPA's is conspiracy created by drug companies, raw tuna will
    purge Alzheimer's amyloid plaques...

    Or that there is no such a thing as an EFA.

    <lol> When the truth is that there is no such thing as an essential
    carbohydrate?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    Sometimes two people would argue point A vs. point B, and say A is
    correct. Nevertheless arguments of the person arguing for A would
    likely be about just as crazy:

    "The earth is round because the voices in my head told me so."

    Yup, sounds like sci (where there is no sci) med.nutrition

    Quoted message said:


    DZ


    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  14. "WillBrink" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Sorry....... ;-)
    I'm not totally familiar with Gohde, but I'm learning fast!

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition. It's been over run
    bu nuts and idiots. It's the type of forum that needs to be moderated.
    It's too bad, a real science based nutrition news group would be great.

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/


    Amen to that, was thinking those exact words when I visited there earlier
    today! Well, nearly those exact words, a bit more swearing ...

  15. "Mr-Natural-Health" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    WillBrink said:

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition. It's been over


    run

    Quoted message said:

    bu nuts and idiots. It's the type of forum that needs to be


    moderated.

    Quoted message said:

    It's too bad, a real science based nutrition news group would be


    great.

    What is your problem, Dork?

    I have two groups of my own: One in Yahoo and the other is in Google.
    Nobody is stopping the big mouth WillBrink, the muscle bound Geek, from
    doing anything.

    Just thought that you might want to know. 🙂

    Ahh once again proving that you belong at sci.med.nutrition it's current
    incarnation(lets hope the SCI makes a comeback soon)
    ahem ... Mr Brink suggests that the lurkers, posters and trollers of
    S.M.N.are less than scientific and you disprove this how? By posting that
    you have two groups, which, whilst neither here nor there, is most
    definitely, absolutely not scientific in any fashion, in fact it is more
    like a "grown up" version of the favoured childhood comeback of "shutup! you
    are!"
    You are of course right, nothing appears to be stopping Will from do
    anything, in fact I think you will find he does quite a few things... or
    maybe I majicked or photosynthesised that info on creatine, ooh and the
    stuff on whey protein, and.... etc ad nauseum...but I believe his point is
    that the name sci.med.nutrition implies that the content and discussions
    are of a scientific, medical nuritional nature, not wild speculation and
    individual experiences of a dubious nature....or I could be wrong, maybe the
    sci stands for scintillating... and the med for mediocre.... or something

  16. "joanne" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    You might want to rethink advising someone with ADD to
    discontinue their physician-prescribed medication.

    I didnt say to discontinue it [censored]. I said to 'rethink' it and find
    out if all his other supplemention goes in tune with it. Does this same
    doctor know what else he takes on a regular basis? Does he monitor all
    his blood levels regularly? Conflict of prescribed medications with
    over the counter supplementing can be a serious problem.

    Quoted message said:

    Which part of "Doc says I have a genetic renal tubule defect
    which causes me to lose magnesium at an abnormal rate" do you
    not understand? Maybe we can find a cartoon website with lots
    of pictures to help you.

    Put down your pedophile comics, get your hand out of your crotch, and
    take a comprehension reading course you twit. I'm quite aware he said
    he had a defect that he needs more magnesium than the average person,
    BUT can he not get more magnesium in real foods instead of it all in a
    pill form? How does he monitor how much magnesium he takes or even
    needs? He just said he takes 'lots' which if he takes too much will
    cause diarrea which will in turn deplete his system of all the extra
    vitamins he is taking.

    Quoted message said:

    You are SUCH a blithering idiot. How have you avoided suicide?

    Has your [censored] grown a centimeter by mouthing off now? Oh no, that cant
    be right ..that would imply that you even have one!

    joanne

    I read this to mean that Joanne's [censored] is much bigger than David's imaginary
    one....

  17. "DZ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    WillBrink said:

    OmManiPadmeOmelet <[email hidden]> wrote:

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition.

    There is something about that group. HIV has nothing to do with AIDS,
    "E" in EPA's is conspiracy created by drug companies, raw tuna will
    purge Alzheimer's amyloid plaques...

    Sometimes two people would argue point A vs. point B, and say A is
    correct. Nevertheless arguments of the person arguing for A would
    likely be about just as crazy:

    "The earth is round because the voices in my head told me so."

    DZ

    Yeah, but come on. When you need a good laugh, there is no better place to
    go.
    So many loonies gathered in one place, Gawd I love Usenet!

    --
    Dr. Dickie
    Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
    Poking kooks with a pointy stick.
    "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
    discoveries,
    is not 'Eureka!' ('I found it!'😉, but rather 'hmm....that's funny...'"
    - Isaac Asimov

  18. Jess Nelson said:

    I read this to mean that Joanne's [censored]
    is much bigger than David's imaginary
    one....

    Now, that is a real science comment.

    Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Both of you [censored] Brains belong in MFW along with your
    penis enlarger THREADs.

    Both, of you Dorks can start your own moderated Science group anytime
    one of you lazy arses gets off your butt. 🙂

    Just thought that you might want to know.

  19. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mr-Natural-Health said:
    WillBrink said:

    The problem is, there is no SCI at sci.med.nutrition. It's been over


    run

    Quoted message said:

    bu nuts and idiots. It's the type of forum that needs to be


    moderated.

    Quoted message said:

    It's too bad, a real science based nutrition news group would be


    great.

    What is your problem, Dork?

    You stupid.

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  20. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mr-Natural-Health said:

    No one study is definitive on anything, or scientifically proves
    anything.

    More so than zero studies, which is what you have shown.

    Seth
    --
    this is called missing the forest for the trees.
    Or just 'being a moron', your call. -- Lyle McDonald

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.