General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

blender vs food processor

Started by Argo · · Last activity · 28 posts · 772 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 September 2005
Last activity
16 October 2005
Original author
Argo
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
772
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. sf said:
    jake said:

    It's a matter of tate and my taste is coarse. I don't like it smooth, i
    might as well eat instant mash. Yuck.

    Maybe your coarse is my lumpy... don't like it, never will. I like my
    mashed potatoes (without any trace of skin) smooth and light.

    Hehe. Well, we could take a poll. I weigh in on the coarse
    side. Lumps and bits of skin are fine.

    --
    Jean B.

  2. "Jean B." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    sf said:
    jake said:

    It's a matter of tate and my taste is coarse. I don't like it smooth,
    i might as well eat instant mash. Yuck.

    Maybe your coarse is my lumpy... don't like it, never will. I like my
    mashed potatoes (without any trace of skin) smooth and light.

    Hehe. Well, we could take a poll. I weigh in on the coarse side.
    Lumps and bits of skin are fine.

    --
    Jean B.

    When I make them smooth, a food mill is the perfect tool. For texture,
    one of those hand held potato mashers does the trick.

  3. Argo said:

    For years I've been getting by with a blender, but I almost killed it
    with a new recipe I tried. The recipe called for whipping mashed
    potatoes with a bunch of other ingredients. The blender seemed to
    think this was too much of a strain for it. (the smell of smoke was a
    clue) However, the recipe was great and I'd like to make it again.

    My question is - would a food processor be a better tool for the job?
    Recommendations?

    I use an electric mixer for that.

    Katherine

  4. "Katherine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Argo said:

    For years I've been getting by with a blender, but I almost killed it
    with a new recipe I tried. The recipe called for whipping mashed
    potatoes with a bunch of other ingredients. The blender seemed to
    think this was too much of a strain for it. (the smell of smoke was a
    clue) However, the recipe was great and I'd like to make it again.

    My question is - would a food processor be a better tool for the job?
    Recommendations?

    I use an electric mixer for that.

    Katherine

    You should not use a blender or a FP or a mixer for mashed potatoes. The
    more they are beaten, the more starch granules break and the stickier and
    gummier the result will be. The best results by far are with a hand masher
    or, if you want to get rid of all lumps, a ricer or food mill.

    --
    Peter Aitken
    Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

  5. "Peter Aitken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Katherine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Argo said:

    For years I've been getting by with a blender, but I almost killed it
    with a new recipe I tried. The recipe called for whipping mashed
    potatoes with a bunch of other ingredients. The blender seemed to
    think this was too much of a strain for it. (the smell of smoke was a
    clue) However, the recipe was great and I'd like to make it again.

    My question is - would a food processor be a better tool for the job?
    Recommendations?

    I use an electric mixer for that.

    Katherine

    You should not use a blender or a FP or a mixer for mashed potatoes. The
    more they are beaten, the more starch granules break and the stickier and
    gummier the result will be. The best results by far are with a hand masher
    or, if you want to get rid of all lumps, a ricer or food mill.

    --
    Peter Aitken
    Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm


    It is true that if you over beat them in a mixer they will get gummy. I've
    never had that problem
    cause I don't overdo it.

    MoM

  6. Peter Aitken said:

    "Katherine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Argo said:

    For years I've been getting by with a blender, but I almost killed it
    with a new recipe I tried. The recipe called for whipping mashed
    potatoes with a bunch of other ingredients. The blender seemed to
    think this was too much of a strain for it. (the smell of smoke was a
    clue) However, the recipe was great and I'd like to make it again.

    My question is - would a food processor be a better tool for the job?
    Recommendations?

    I use an electric mixer for that.

    Katherine

    You should not use a blender or a FP or a mixer for mashed potatoes. The
    more they are beaten, the more starch granules break and the stickier and
    gummier the result will be. The best results by far are with a hand masher
    or, if you want to get rid of all lumps, a ricer or food mill.

    I don't know about a food processor, but a hand mixer won't
    necessarily turn the potatoes gummy. Certainly that's never happened
    to me and I usually mash first then whip the potatoes.

    An oven will turn a beef roast into a lump of dried out leather, but
    it doesn't have to. The outcome depends on the operator as well as
    the equipment!

    Sue(tm)
    Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

  7. Curly Sue said:

    I don't know about a food processor, but a hand mixer won't
    necessarily turn the potatoes gummy. Certainly that's never happened
    to me and I usually mash first then whip the potatoes.

    The mixer won't do it, but adding too much liquid certainly will.
    I've made potato glue in the past.

  8. On Sun 16 Oct 2005 02:03:57p, sf wrote in rec.food.cooking:

    Quoted message said:
    Curly Sue said:

    I don't know about a food processor, but a hand mixer won't
    necessarily turn the potatoes gummy. Certainly that's never happened
    to me and I usually mash first then whip the potatoes.

    The mixer won't do it, but adding too much liquid certainly will.
    I've made potato glue in the past.

    In all the years I've made mashed potatoes I have religiously avoided using
    a hand or stand mixer because of all the things I had read about making
    them gooey or gummy. I've usually used a ricer or an old-fashioned potato
    masher. A few weeks ago I was just too tired/lazy to put any muscle into
    mashing by hand, so decided to try my hand mixer. After shaking them in
    the pot, as usual, to dry them out, I attacked them at low speed with the
    hand mixer. After they were initially broken up I added the butter. After
    the butter was incorporated I added buttermilk (our favorite liquid). I was
    amazed at how great they turned out, nice and fluffy, no lumps, without a
    trace of gumminess. Maybe the key is "low" speed and judicious additions
    of liquid. I can see how too much liquid could make them either gummy or
    into "soup".

    --
    Wayne Boatwright *¿*
    _____________________________

    http://tinypic.com/eikz78.jpg

    Meet Mr. Bailey

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.