Road Cycling · Public discussion

Bill C drops out of sight...

Started by Email address hidden · 27 July 2006 · Last activity 28 July 2006 · 11 posts · 368 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postBill C drops out of sight...Email address hidden · 27 Jul 2006 02 / This pagePosts 1–11Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #11Michael Press · 28 Jul 2006

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section: Road Cycling
Published: 27 July 2006
Last activity: 28 July 2006
Original author: Email address hidden
Posts: 11
Discussion status: Public discussion
Total views: 368
Views / 30 days: 0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Original post
Email address hidden
Archived post

27 July 2006, 23:19 UTC #1

Defender of all accused.

Report
Email address hidden
Archived post

28 July 2006, 00:08 UTC #2

Quoted message said:
Defender of all accused.
He will be back tomorrow. He's eating.

Report
Bill C
Archived post

28 July 2006, 00:13 UTC #3

Quoted message said:
Defender of all accused.

Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
Bill C

Report
Bill C
Archived post

28 July 2006, 00:13 UTC #4

Quoted message said:
Defender of all accused.

Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
Bill C

Report
Bill C
Archived post

28 July 2006, 00:14 UTC #5

Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Defender of all accused.
He will be back tomorrow. He's eating.

Yep, I was.
Bill C

Report
Tim Lines
Archived post

28 July 2006, 01:29 UTC #6

Bill C said:
Quoted message said:
Defender of all accused.
Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
Bill C

You're the ACLU? I thought you were still the NRA. I can't keep up
with you.

Report
Howard Kveck
Archived post

28 July 2006, 02:02 UTC #7

In article <[email hidden]>,
Tim Lines said:
Bill C said:
Quoted message said:
Defender of all accused.
Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
Bill C

You're the ACLU? I thought you were still the NRA. I can't keep up
with you.
Hmm, maybe he's started the NRACLU.
--
tanx,
Howard
Never take a tenant with a monkey.
remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Report
Bill C
Archived post

28 July 2006, 11:46 UTC #8

Tim Lines said:
Bill C said:
Quoted message said:
Defender of all accused.
Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
Bill C

You're the ACLU? I thought you were still the NRA. I can't keep up
with you.
That's what happens when people actually think for themselves. You can
very easily support portions of the agenda of groups that are totally
opposed. I support the majority of what both groups are trying to do,
but have enough problems with both that I'm not a member of either.
That's one of the fun things around here, almost everyone fits the
"think for yourself" mold.
Bill C

Report
Michael Press
Archived post

28 July 2006, 20:03 UTC #9

In article
<[email hidden]>,
Bill C said:
Tim Lines said:
Bill C said:
[email hidden] wrote:
>Defender of all accused.
Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
Bill C

You're the ACLU? I thought you were still the NRA. I can't keep up
with you.
That's what happens when people actually think for themselves. You can
very easily support portions of the agenda of groups that are totally
opposed. I support the majority of what both groups are trying to do,
but have enough problems with both that I'm not a member of either.
That's one of the fun things around here, almost everyone fits the
"think for yourself" mold.
Does the ACLU undertake second amendment rights cases?
--
Michael Press

Report
Bill C
Archived post

28 July 2006, 20:36 UTC #10

Michael Press said:
In article
<[email hidden]>,
Bill C said:
Tim Lines said:
Bill C wrote:
> [email hidden] wrote:
>
>>Defender of all accused.
>
> Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
> Bill C
>
You're the ACLU? I thought you were still the NRA. I can't keep up
with you.
That's what happens when people actually think for themselves. You can
very easily support portions of the agenda of groups that are totally
opposed. I support the majority of what both groups are trying to do,
but have enough problems with both that I'm not a member of either.
That's one of the fun things around here, almost everyone fits the
"think for yourself" mold.
Does the ACLU undertake second amendment rights cases?
--
Michael Press
Nope. Their carved in granite position is that it only applies to the
US military, and possibly police forces, but they have constitutional
questions about that since the "police" aren't a militia.
Bill C

Report
Michael Press
Archived post

28 July 2006, 22:26 UTC #11

In article
<[email hidden]>,
Bill C said:
Michael Press said:
In article
<[email hidden]>,
Bill C said:
Tim Lines wrote:
> Bill C wrote:
> > [email hidden] wrote:
> >
> >>Defender of all accused.
> >
> > Yep, just like that evil ACLU.
> >
> You're the ACLU? I thought you were still the NRA. I can't keep up
> with you.
That's what happens when people actually think for themselves. You can
very easily support portions of the agenda of groups that are totally
opposed. I support the majority of what both groups are trying to do,
but have enough problems with both that I'm not a member of either.
That's one of the fun things around here, almost everyone fits the
"think for yourself" mold.
Does the ACLU undertake second amendment rights cases?
Nope. Their carved in granite position is that it only applies to the
US military, and possibly police forces, but they have constitutional
questions about that since the "police" aren't a militia.
Convenient. No need to defend people who are so tasteless
that they defend themselves.
--
Michael Press

Report

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.

Jump through the discussion

What we know about this thread

Continue through CyclingForums

Active in this thread