Road Cycling · Public discussion

Bikers vs. Cyclists

Started by Buck · · Last activity · 23 posts · 422 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
19 July 2006
Last activity
21 July 2006
Original author
Buck
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
422
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?

    -Buck

  2. Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?

    -Buck

    Absolutely right!. A biker rides a motorcycle and a cyclist rides a
    real bike. 😉

    Perhaps I shouldn't have said that as I build motorcycle wheels for a
    living :-)

  3. "Buck" wrote: (clip) To me, a "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang.
    (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Motorcyclists generally refer to themselves as "bikers," mostly because the
    word is short enough to be convenient, but also because it exhibits a
    certain charming understatement. I have heard them call a Harley a
    "scooter," for somewhat the same reason. However, please guard against
    injecting unwanted meaning into your thinking by your choice of words. What
    makes a group a gang? Is it some unlawful activity, or is it just that they
    look like undesirables. Would an incorporated motorcycle club, with
    by-laws and officers be called a "gang." just because they are riding down
    the freeway in a pack?

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?

    I almost entirely agree with you. Except I figure
    a lone-wolf, non-club motorcyclist can be a biker too.

    I notice "bikie" (referring to bicyclists) with
    increasing frequency. I don't think I like that
    one much. It sounds too diminuitive and a little
    derogatory to me.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  5. Leo Lichtman said:

    "Buck" wrote: (clip) To me, a "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang.
    (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Motorcyclists generally refer to themselves as "bikers," mostly because the
    word is short enough to be convenient, but also because it exhibits a
    certain charming understatement. I have heard them call a Harley a
    "scooter," for somewhat the same reason. However, please guard against
    injecting unwanted meaning into your thinking by your choice of words. What
    makes a group a gang? Is it some unlawful activity, or is it just that they
    look like undesirables. Would an incorporated motorcycle club, with
    by-laws and officers be called a "gang." just because they are riding down
    the freeway in a pack?

    I'm glad to see someone else is perturbed about the use of a particular
    word to describe a group. I also objected to the use of "biker" to
    describe me on my motorcycle. My motorcycle wouldn't be used by a
    "biker", as it was not a Harley, chopper, cruiser, bob-tail, etc. It
    was more of a sport-tourer:
    http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/epic_mcy/1982_seca650turbo_small.aspx

    Perhaps it is my original objection to being classified as a "biker"
    while on my motorcycle which has led to my objection to the term being
    used to describe me while on my bicycle. In my opinion, not all
    operators of two-wheeled transportation should be considered "bikers"
    just as not all motorcycling groups should be called "gangs." There is
    a negative connotation in both "bikers" and "gangs." Thus my connection
    between the two terms: a biker is someone who is in a gang. And yes, I
    tend to think of them as a particularly lawless group.

    I'm sure that is why law-abiding motorcyclists often refer to
    themselves as members of a motorcycling club, not gang.

    -Buck

  6. [email hidden] (Tom Keats) wrote in news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I notice "bikie" (referring to bicyclists) with
    increasing frequency. I don't think I like that
    one much. It sounds too diminuitive and a little
    derogatory to me.

    During the 1970s bike boom, bicyclists referred to themselves as
    "bikees" to diffentiate themselves from motorcyclists (bikers). Today,
    "cyclist" or "roadie" or "mountain biker" are more common.

  7. Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?

    Hell no. In fact around here a local biker recently referred to pickup
    truck drivers as truckers and was publicly flogged. Didn't get as many
    replies as a recent helmet-use troll tho (57 vs 4K). At least I
    haven't heard anyone since Stirling Moss call a helmet a hat.

    Doug

  8. Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?

    -Buck

    Out local daily newspaper, the Northwest Herald in Crystal Lake, IL,
    fairly consistently refers to motorcyclists as cyclists.

    Go figure!

    larry

  9. I never refer to myself as a biker, since where I live it would imply
    that I ride a motorcycle. "Cyclist" sounds a little bit effete to me,
    but I might use that term or some other like "bike rider" if I think the
    person I am talking to might be confused as to whether I ride a bicycle
    or a motorcycle. It's probably a regional thing anyway. Truth is, it
    does not come up in conversation for me all that often, even though most
    people I know are aware that I ride nearly every day.

  10. Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?

    No, but I don't think the disambiguation will become common usage for
    a while yet.

    Additionally, there is a faction which regards the term "cyclist" as
    excessively elitist, and popular usage is what defines this language,
    not arbitrary rules from a central authority.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  11. Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?


    When I rode motorcycles I objected to "biker".

    As a "cyclist", that's what I usually call myself. But, many of my
    bicycling friends easily refer to themselves as "bikers".
    Now I've two tee-shirts with artsy graphics proclaiming, "BIKER".
    I wear 'em.
    --
    zk

  12. Motorcycylist are called both bikers and cyclists, just to make it a
    little ore confusing.

    I always thought if a BIcyClE was callea a bike, a MOtercyClE should ba
    called a Moke.

    - -
    Comments and opinions compliments of,
    "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    My web Site:
    http://geocities.com/czcorner

    To E-mail me:
    ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net

  13. The term "biker" I believe came from the ol tyme term "motor-BIKE".

    In it's earlier days 'round'bout the time of the Penny Farthing, a
    bicyclist was called Wheelman.

    Use that term nowadays most people think either you're a trucker (big
    rig) or the driver of the get-away car!

    - -
    Comments and opinions compliments of,
    "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    My web Site:
    http://geocities.com/czcorner

    To E-mail me:
    ChrisZCorner "at" webtv "dot" net

  14. Zoot Katz said:
    Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?


    When I rode motorcycles I objected to "biker".

    As a "cyclist", that's what I usually call myself. But, many of my
    bicycling friends easily refer to themselves as "bikers".
    Now I've two tee-shirts with artsy graphics proclaiming, "BIKER".
    I wear 'em.

    I don't want to stir it up but here is my input.
    To be politically correct (A term I hate) a cyclist is anyone on 2
    wheels. A biker is a subset of that group that happens to have a motor.
    The one thing that I want to mention is that with motorcyclists (and I
    hope bicyclists) is that if you mess with one, you have just messed with
    them all. A gang can be just 5 guys that like to ride together, as it
    was with me before I met my wife.
    The 'Brotherhood' thing came about when some dumb red neck tried to pick
    a fight with one of the guys whom he was bigger than, and suddenly there
    were 3 or more other Motorcyclists joining in to even the odds or just
    cancel the bully's ambitions.
    I hope it works with that with bicyclists, too.
    Back then (~1976) a biker had a motorcycle, a cyclist a bicycle.
    Things may have changed, but I think the code of taking care of one
    another will never change.
    Bill (both sides of the fence) Baka

    Cyclist now, no gas, and no silly Ninja looking motorcycle.

  15. screw all that. I'm a biker. I ride a bike. Let them call themselves
    motorcyclists.

    Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?

    -Buck

  16. On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:29:21 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Zoot Katz said:
    Buck said:

    I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    "cyclist".

    Am I the only one?


    When I rode motorcycles I objected to "biker".

    As a "cyclist", that's what I usually call myself. But, many of my
    bicycling friends easily refer to themselves as "bikers".
    Now I've two tee-shirts with artsy graphics proclaiming, "BIKER".
    I wear 'em.

    I don't want to stir it up but here is my input.
    To be politically correct (A term I hate) a cyclist is anyone on 2
    wheels. A biker is a subset of that group that happens to have a motor.

    Quoted message said:

    The one thing that I want to mention is that with motorcyclists (and I
    hope bicyclists) is that if you mess with one, you have just messed with
    them all. A gang can be just 5 guys that like to ride together, as it
    was with me before I met my wife.
    The 'Brotherhood' thing came about when some dumb red neck tried to pick
    a fight with one of the guys whom he was bigger than, and suddenly there
    were 3 or more other Motorcyclists joining in to even the odds or just
    cancel the bully's ambitions.
    I hope it works with that with bicyclists, too.
    Back then (~1976) a biker had a motorcycle, a cyclist a bicycle.
    Things may have changed, but I think the code of taking care of one
    another will never change.

    Baka, what does your report on the gang attitude of guys on motors
    have to do with the current topic under discussion?

  17. R Brickston said:

    On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:29:21 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Zoot Katz said:

    On 19 Jul 2006 06:21:15 -0700, "Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    > "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    > "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    > eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    > "cyclist".
    >
    > Am I the only one?
    >
    When I rode motorcycles I objected to "biker".

    As a "cyclist", that's what I usually call myself. But, many of my
    bicycling friends easily refer to themselves as "bikers".
    Now I've two tee-shirts with artsy graphics proclaiming, "BIKER".
    I wear 'em.


    I don't want to stir it up but here is my input.
    To be politically correct (A term I hate) a cyclist is anyone on 2
    wheels. A biker is a subset of that group that happens to have a motor.

    Quoted message said:

    The one thing that I want to mention is that with motorcyclists (and I
    hope bicyclists) is that if you mess with one, you have just messed with
    them all. A gang can be just 5 guys that like to ride together, as it
    was with me before I met my wife.
    The 'Brotherhood' thing came about when some dumb red neck tried to pick
    a fight with one of the guys whom he was bigger than, and suddenly there
    were 3 or more other Motorcyclists joining in to even the odds or just
    cancel the bully's ambitions.
    I hope it works with that with bicyclists, too.
    Back then (~1976) a biker had a motorcycle, a cyclist a bicycle.
    Things may have changed, but I think the code of taking care of one
    another will never change.

    Baka, what does your report on the gang attitude of guys on motors
    have to do with the current topic under discussion?


    I you had any even small amount of brains you would probably not want
    to walk up to a bunch of guys hanging by their Harleys and start talking
    about them being cyclists, and not bikers. That would save us a lot of
    wasted bandwidth by you. I can only hope you take the bait.
    Oh, yeah, and ask them why they aren't riding the far 'superior' rice
    rockets from Japan that are made to look like big V-twins.
    I hope you feet can't run as fast as you fingers spew garbage.
    We have one Motorcycle shop that has gone as far as putting out a sign
    that says "Harleys Only.". This discussion, if you can read the title,
    does say Bikers vs. Cyclists.
    The bikers tend to be a bit touchy about their $20,000 Harley being
    compared to a 'bicycle'.
    That's my only point, since I know the Harley guy around the corner.
    Bill Baka

  18. R Brickston said:


    Baka, what does your report on the gang attitude of guys on motors
    have to do with the current topic under discussion?

    Nothing. Filters are your friend.

  19. On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:30:31 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    R Brickston said:

    On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:29:21 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Zoot Katz wrote:
    > On 19 Jul 2006 06:21:15 -0700, "Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >> I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    >> "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    >> "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    >> eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    >> "cyclist".
    >>
    >> Am I the only one?
    >>
    > When I rode motorcycles I objected to "biker".
    >
    > As a "cyclist", that's what I usually call myself. But, many of my
    > bicycling friends easily refer to themselves as "bikers".
    > Now I've two tee-shirts with artsy graphics proclaiming, "BIKER".
    > I wear 'em.
    I don't want to stir it up but here is my input.
    To be politically correct (A term I hate) a cyclist is anyone on 2
    wheels. A biker is a subset of that group that happens to have a motor.

    Quoted message said:

    The one thing that I want to mention is that with motorcyclists (and I
    hope bicyclists) is that if you mess with one, you have just messed with
    them all. A gang can be just 5 guys that like to ride together, as it
    was with me before I met my wife.
    The 'Brotherhood' thing came about when some dumb red neck tried to pick
    a fight with one of the guys whom he was bigger than, and suddenly there
    were 3 or more other Motorcyclists joining in to even the odds or just
    cancel the bully's ambitions.
    I hope it works with that with bicyclists, too.
    Back then (~1976) a biker had a motorcycle, a cyclist a bicycle.
    Things may have changed, but I think the code of taking care of one
    another will never change.

    Baka, what does your report on the gang attitude of guys on motors
    have to do with the current topic under discussion?


    I you had any even small amount of brains you would probably not want
    to walk up to a bunch of guys hanging by their Harleys and start talking
    about them being cyclists, and not bikers. That would save us a lot of
    wasted bandwidth by you. I can only hope you take the bait.
    Oh, yeah, and ask them why they aren't riding the far 'superior' rice
    rockets from Japan that are made to look like big V-twins.
    I hope you feet can't run as fast as you fingers spew garbage.
    We have one Motorcycle shop that has gone as far as putting out a sign
    that says "Harleys Only.". This discussion, if you can read the title,
    does say Bikers vs. Cyclists.
    The bikers tend to be a bit touchy about their $20,000 Harley being
    compared to a 'bicycle'.

    I doubt it would even be a remote interest to a cyclist (or anyone
    else for that matter) to approach "a bunch of guys hanging by their
    Harleys" and enter in to a discussion of what they are or are not.
    Further, I think the possible dangers of such an encounter would be
    obvious.

    Quoted message said:

    That's my only point, since I know the Harley guy around the corner.
    Bill Baka

    No, I think the "point" is to get on your high horse and brag about
    how (allegedly) tough you are. Once again, the ones that keep bringing
    it up, usually aren't.

    While we're on the subject of your ridiculously fabricated fantasy
    life, how about explaining this one:

    On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:41:41 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yep.
    He was an ex-Oakland raider quarterback by the name of Dave Jones and
    was a pretty good overall Gym teacher but he could not get me to call
    "Uncle" so instead he hated me to the point of flunking me, knowing that
    I needed his lousy 5 credit class to graduate. That is partly my fault
    since I never took any extra credit classes to put my credits over the top.
    Bill Baka

    Quoted message said:

    The only Oakland Raider named Dave Jones played TE in 1992. Further,
    there has never been an Oakland Raider named Jones that played QB.

    Quoted message said:

    http://raiders.com/history/alltime_roster_j.jsp

  20. R Brickston said:

    On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:30:31 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    R Brickston said:

    On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:29:21 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    > Zoot Katz wrote:
    >> On 19 Jul 2006 06:21:15 -0700, "Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >>
    >>> I've noticed a trend where cyclists are being called bikers. To me, a
    >>> "biker" is a member of a motorcycling gang. Webster's indicates that
    >>> "biker" applies to both bicyclists and motorcyclists. But I prefer to
    >>> eliminate the confusion. No one would think of a Hell's Angel as a
    >>> "cyclist".
    >>>
    >>> Am I the only one?
    >>>
    >> When I rode motorcycles I objected to "biker".
    >>
    >> As a "cyclist", that's what I usually call myself. But, many of my
    >> bicycling friends easily refer to themselves as "bikers".
    >> Now I've two tee-shirts with artsy graphics proclaiming, "BIKER".
    >> I wear 'em.
    > I don't want to stir it up but here is my input.
    > To be politically correct (A term I hate) a cyclist is anyone on 2
    > wheels. A biker is a subset of that group that happens to have a motor.
    > The one thing that I want to mention is that with motorcyclists (and I
    > hope bicyclists) is that if you mess with one, you have just messed with
    > them all. A gang can be just 5 guys that like to ride together, as it
    > was with me before I met my wife.
    > The 'Brotherhood' thing came about when some dumb red neck tried to pick
    > a fight with one of the guys whom he was bigger than, and suddenly there
    > were 3 or more other Motorcyclists joining in to even the odds or just
    > cancel the bully's ambitions.
    > I hope it works with that with bicyclists, too.
    > Back then (~1976) a biker had a motorcycle, a cyclist a bicycle.
    > Things may have changed, but I think the code of taking care of one
    > another will never change.
    Baka, what does your report on the gang attitude of guys on motors
    have to do with the current topic under discussion?


    I you had any even small amount of brains you would probably not want
    to walk up to a bunch of guys hanging by their Harleys and start talking
    about them being cyclists, and not bikers. That would save us a lot of
    wasted bandwidth by you. I can only hope you take the bait.
    Oh, yeah, and ask them why they aren't riding the far 'superior' rice
    rockets from Japan that are made to look like big V-twins.
    I hope you feet can't run as fast as you fingers spew garbage.
    We have one Motorcycle shop that has gone as far as putting out a sign
    that says "Harleys Only.". This discussion, if you can read the title,
    does say Bikers vs. Cyclists.
    The bikers tend to be a bit touchy about their $20,000 Harley being
    compared to a 'bicycle'.

    I doubt it would even be a remote interest to a cyclist (or anyone
    else for that matter) to approach "a bunch of guys hanging by their
    Harleys" and enter in to a discussion of what they are or are not.
    Further, I think the possible dangers of such an encounter would be
    obvious.

    OK,
    So you are a sissy who would be intimidated by big guys on big bikes.
    Wimp.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    That's my only point, since I know the Harley guy around the corner.
    Bill Baka

    No, I think the "point" is to get on your high horse and brag about
    how (allegedly) tough you are. Once again, the ones that keep bringing
    it up, usually aren't.

    While we're on the subject of your ridiculously fabricated fantasy
    life, how about explaining this one:

    On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:41:41 GMT, Bill <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yep.
    He was an ex-Oakland raider quarterback by the name of Dave Jones and
    was a pretty good overall Gym teacher but he could not get me to call
    "Uncle" so instead he hated me to the point of flunking me, knowing that
    I needed his lousy 5 credit class to graduate. That is partly my fault
    since I never took any extra credit classes to put my credits over the top.
    Bill Baka

    I will look in my high school yearbook if I can ever find it and give
    you the full stats on him. I can't claim to have perfect recall of all
    my teachers names at this point but I do recall he said he was a
    quarterback for Either the Raiders (I thought) or maybe (worse) the 49'ers.
    Right now, you aren't worth my bother.
    Bill Baka

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    The only Oakland Raider named Dave Jones played TE in 1992. Further,
    there has never been an Oakland Raider named Jones that played QB.

    Quoted message said:

    http://raiders.com/history/alltime_roster_j.jsp

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.