On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:43:05 -0400, Badger_South <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Rick Onanian said:My main road bike is a size too small because I wasn't
smart enough to know when I bought it. With an
appropriate stem to put the handlebars in a reasonable
spot, it's good for me.
If you can get the right size, get it; the hard part is
knowing. Search this newsgroup at groups.google.com to
find loads and loads of information on fitting, and links
to fit calculators.
Numbers? You're six feet tall, right? Are you riding a 17
inch frame?
I'm probably 5'10" or so. The frame in question is a Giant
TCR2 compact frame in "Medium", which I think is supposed
to be equivalent to a 55cm. Huh? A "medium giant"? No
conflict there? 😉
Actually, according to Giant's sizing web page at giant-giant-Open ↗
bicycles.com/us/050.000.000/050.600.100.asp it is the
correct frame for me, but I suspect a larger frame would be
more appropriate.
Hah! They offer a small giant. Maybe I should start a bike
company called "minuscule" and sell large frames.
Quoted message said:My LBS looked at me and said 17.5, but the bike seemed
small to me. I'm 5'9".
Mountain or road?
MTB sizing is generally done on the small side, and that's
ok. Road sizing is done small now too, but that's _not_ ok.
It makes sense for off-road riding to have lots of extra
clearance everywhere and short reach, and so much time is
spent out of the saddle and doing weird stuff and flying
off the bike into sharp rocks that you don't notice minor
size issues.
Road bikes, OTOH, should be fit perfectly. I understand that
many years ago, road sizing was done too large; that must
have been unpleasant. Now they do it too small, for minor
weight savings, purported stiffness, and extra-low
handlebars. The trouble is that road biking, with so much
time and so many miles spent in the saddle in one position,
is very sensitive to minor size issues.
Quoted message said:(Would it be worse to have a bike that's too large than a
bit too small? There'd be no way to fix that without sawing
off something, eh? <g>😉
Depends on exactly what's too large. Top tube height?
Replace 700c wheels with 650c. KOPS? Setback seatpost.
Reach? Stem. Bar height? Stem. Saddle height? Seatpost. Etc.
Modifications can be made to make most bikes fit most
people, if sufficiently motivated.
Fit goes beyond how your body contacts the bike, IMO. Fit
should also include how you're going to use the bike, and
your abilities. In this region, a double crank doesn't make
sense for beginners, weak riders, people living in extra-
steep areas, or anybody not completely sure of their needs.
I'm not sure it makes much sense for anybody, but I
certainly shouldn't have left that store with a double. In
fact, I should have had a sport tourer, or at least
something whose geometry is a little more relaxed than the
hardcore racer that I bought -- maybe a Giant OCR. I know
now...I know a _lot_ more than I did then. I'm nearly
"saavy". Unfortunately, bike shop employees tend to be
either racer-wannabes (and expect everybody else to be), or
don't give a damn, or dumb, or too busy focusing on bringing
in the benjamins (how's that for me being hip! 😉 to help
somebody choose the right bike.
This newsfroup should write a training manual for bike shop
owners and employees. Now that I've done the hard work of
coming up with that idea, it's up to the rest of you to
implement it. What, me spend MORE time on it? Sheesh, how
ungrateful... <BFG>
--
Rick Onanian