Road Cycling · Public discussion

Bike Sizes

Started by James Lynx · · Last activity · 13 posts · 571 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
24 May 2004
Last activity
25 May 2004
Original author
James Lynx
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
571
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I recently tried some bikes. A 19 inch frame is my proper size but
    when I try a 16 inch frame it doesn't feel really small to me but the
    bike shop owner and my girlfriend say that a 16 inch frame looks small
    for my height. That may seem true but I felt more comfortable on a 16
    than 19 inch frame. It could be because I used to ride BMX and those
    are tiny. Sure I'm 6 foot tall and can not ride BMX anymore but the
    16 inch bike is between the BMX size and 19 inch frame, but closer to
    the 19 inch. I just feel that I get more monuverability and feel
    more comfortable on a 16t inch. I like bikes that are a bit smaller
    than what normally I should be useing.

    Do you guys ride bikes that are the perfect fit for your height or do
    you guys ride bikes that are smaller and why?

    Thanks,

    James

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I recently tried some bikes. A 19 inch frame is my proper size but
    when I try a 16 inch frame it doesn't feel really small to me but the
    bike shop owner and my girlfriend say that a 16 inch frame looks small
    for my height. That may seem true but I felt more comfortable on a 16
    than 19 inch frame. It could be because I used to ride BMX and those
    are tiny. Sure I'm 6 foot tall and can not ride BMX anymore but the
    16 inch bike is between the BMX size and 19 inch frame, but closer to
    the 19 inch. I just feel that I get more monuverability and feel
    more comfortable on a 16t inch. I like bikes that are a bit smaller
    than what normally I should be useing.

    Do you guys ride bikes that are the perfect fit for your height or do
    you guys ride bikes that are smaller and why?

    The "perfect fit" is the one which is most comfortable for you, but you
    often can't tell which is going to be more comfortable until you can
    test it on an extended ride. That said, the current fashion is to ride
    bikes which are on the small side, and put long stems and setback seat
    posts on them. Personally, I prefer bikes on the large side, rather
    than small.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
    newsgroups if possible).

  3. On 24 May 2004 12:13:48 -0700, [email hidden] (James Lynx)

    Quoted message said:

    Do you guys ride bikes that are the perfect fit for your height or do
    you guys ride bikes that are smaller and why?

    My main road bike is a size too small because I wasn't smart enough
    to know when I bought it. With an appropriate stem to put the
    handlebars in a reasonable spot, it's good for me.

    If you can get the right size, get it; the hard part is knowing.
    Search this newsgroup at groups.google.com to find loads and loads
    of information on fitting, and links to fit calculators.
    --
    Rick Onanian

  4. Rick Onanian said:

    On 24 May 2004 12:13:48 -0700, [email hidden] (James Lynx)

    Quoted message said:

    Do you guys ride bikes that are the perfect fit for your height or do
    you guys ride bikes that are smaller and why?

    My main road bike is a size too small because I wasn't smart enough
    to know when I bought it. With an appropriate stem to put the
    handlebars in a reasonable spot, it's good for me.

    If you can get the right size, get it; the hard part is knowing.
    Search this newsgroup at groups.google.com to find loads and loads
    of information on fitting, and links to fit calculators.

    Numbers? You're six feet tall, right? Are you riding a 17 inch frame?

    My LBS looked at me and said 17.5, but the bike seemed small to me. I'm
    5'9".

    (Would it be worse to have a bike that's too large than a bit too small?
    There'd be no way to fix that without sawing off something, eh? <g>😉

    -B

  5. On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:43:05 -0400, Badger_South <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Rick Onanian said:

    My main road bike is a size too small because I wasn't smart enough
    to know when I bought it. With an appropriate stem to put the
    handlebars in a reasonable spot, it's good for me.

    If you can get the right size, get it; the hard part is knowing.
    Search this newsgroup at groups.google.com to find loads and loads
    of information on fitting, and links to fit calculators.

    Numbers? You're six feet tall, right? Are you riding a 17 inch frame?

    I'm probably 5'10" or so. The frame in question is a Giant TCR2
    compact frame in "Medium", which I think is supposed to be
    equivalent to a 55cm. Huh? A "medium giant"? No conflict there? 😉

    Actually, according to Giant's sizing web page at
    http://www.giant-bicycles.com/us/050.000.000/050.600.100.asp
    it is the correct frame for me, but I suspect a larger frame would
    be more appropriate.

    Hah! They offer a small giant. Maybe I should start a bike company
    called "minuscule" and sell large frames.

    Quoted message said:

    My LBS looked at me and said 17.5, but the bike seemed small to me. I'm
    5'9".

    Mountain or road?

    MTB sizing is generally done on the small side, and that's ok. Road
    sizing is done small now too, but that's _not_ ok. It makes sense
    for off-road riding to have lots of extra clearance everywhere and
    short reach, and so much time is spent out of the saddle and doing
    weird stuff and flying off the bike into sharp rocks that you don't
    notice minor size issues.

    Road bikes, OTOH, should be fit perfectly. I understand that many
    years ago, road sizing was done too large; that must have been
    unpleasant. Now they do it too small, for minor weight savings,
    purported stiffness, and extra-low handlebars. The trouble is that
    road biking, with so much time and so many miles spent in the saddle
    in one position, is very sensitive to minor size issues.

    Quoted message said:

    (Would it be worse to have a bike that's too large than a bit too small?
    There'd be no way to fix that without sawing off something, eh? <g>😉

    Depends on exactly what's too large.
    Top tube height? Replace 700c wheels with 650c.
    KOPS? Setback seatpost.
    Reach? Stem.
    Bar height? Stem.
    Saddle height? Seatpost.
    Etc. Modifications can be made to make most bikes fit most people,
    if sufficiently motivated.

    Fit goes beyond how your body contacts the bike, IMO. Fit should
    also include how you're going to use the bike, and your abilities.
    In this region, a double crank doesn't make sense for beginners,
    weak riders, people living in extra-steep areas, or anybody not
    completely sure of their needs. I'm not sure it makes much sense for
    anybody, but I certainly shouldn't have left that store with a
    double. In fact, I should have had a sport tourer, or at least
    something whose geometry is a little more relaxed than the hardcore
    racer that I bought -- maybe a Giant OCR. I know now...I know a
    _lot_ more than I did then. I'm nearly "saavy". Unfortunately, bike
    shop employees tend to be either racer-wannabes (and expect
    everybody else to be), or don't give a damn, or dumb, or too busy
    focusing on bringing in the benjamins (how's that for me being hip!
    😉 to help somebody choose the right bike.

    This newsfroup should write a training manual for bike shop owners
    and employees. Now that I've done the hard work of coming up with
    that idea, it's up to the rest of you to implement it. What, me
    spend MORE time on it? Sheesh, how ungrateful... <BFG>
    --
    Rick Onanian

  6. Hello James,

    when you have both feet on the ground, there should be a 2 inch clearance
    between the top bar of the frame and yourself. Less is dangerous, more will
    make adjusting the rest more complicated. In essence the bigger the bike,
    faster you can go with the same effort. Think of those BMX bikes, even with
    great effort they can't go that fast.

    "James Lynx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I recently tried some bikes. A 19 inch frame is my proper size but
    when I try a 16 inch frame it doesn't feel really small to me but the
    bike shop owner and my girlfriend say that a 16 inch frame looks small
    for my height. That may seem true but I felt more comfortable on a 16
    than 19 inch frame. It could be because I used to ride BMX and those
    are tiny. Sure I'm 6 foot tall and can not ride BMX anymore but the
    16 inch bike is between the BMX size and 19 inch frame, but closer to
    the 19 inch. I just feel that I get more monuverability and feel
    more comfortable on a 16t inch. I like bikes that are a bit smaller
    than what normally I should be useing.

    Do you guys ride bikes that are the perfect fit for your height or do
    you guys ride bikes that are smaller and why?

    Thanks,

    James

  7. No, my LBS said that I was right for a 19 inch frame. I do feel more
    comfortable on a 16 inch frame and that's probably because I used to
    ride BMX bikes (years ago) and now want to get back into biking and
    feel that I have more control over the bike if I have a slightly
    smaller frame. I was thinking maybe a 16 inch but yeah that's gotta
    be mega small on me so maybe a 17.5 if there is such things.

    Thanks

    Quoted message said:


    Numbers? You're six feet tall, right? Are you riding a 17 inch frame?

    My LBS looked at me and said 17.5, but the bike seemed small to me. I'm
    5'9".

    (Would it be worse to have a bike that's too large than a bit too small?
    There'd be no way to fix that without sawing off something, eh? <g>😉

    -B

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello James,

    when you have both feet on the ground, there should be a 2 inch clearance
    between the top bar of the frame and yourself. Less is dangerous, more will

    I disagree somewhat on this. On a MTB, I would say *at least* 2 inches,
    but on a road bike 1" is enough.

    .....

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
    newsgroups if possible).

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    ....

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (Would it be worse to have a bike that's too large than a bit too small?
    There'd be no way to fix that without sawing off something, eh? <g>😉

    Depends on exactly what's too large.
    Top tube height? Replace 700c wheels with 650c.

    Might be kind of tough to get the brakes to work, though...

    Quoted message said:

    KOPS? Setback seatpost.
    Reach? Stem.
    Bar height? Stem.
    Saddle height? Seatpost.
    Etc. Modifications can be made to make most bikes fit most people,
    if sufficiently motivated.

    .....

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
    newsgroups if possible).

  10. What if we are talking about a compact frame? I have a size 55 Specialized
    Allez. I have more than 2" from the cross bar to my crotch, but I am pretty
    sure the bike fits me.

    By the way James, don't get mixed up in comfortable, and familiar. You may
    be more used to the feel of a smaller bike, but it may prevent you from
    getting the most out of your effort.

    Jim

    "Daniel Crispin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello James,

    when you have both feet on the ground, there should be a 2 inch clearance
    between the top bar of the frame and yourself. Less is dangerous, more


    will

    Quoted message said:

    make adjusting the rest more complicated. In essence the bigger the


    bike,

    Quoted message said:

    faster you can go with the same effort. Think of those BMX bikes, even


    with

    Quoted message said:

    great effort they can't go that fast.

    "James Lynx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I recently tried some bikes. A 19 inch frame is my proper size but
    when I try a 16 inch frame it doesn't feel really small to me but the
    bike shop owner and my girlfriend say that a 16 inch frame looks small
    for my height. That may seem true but I felt more comfortable on a 16
    than 19 inch frame. It could be because I used to ride BMX and those
    are tiny. Sure I'm 6 foot tall and can not ride BMX anymore but the
    16 inch bike is between the BMX size and 19 inch frame, but closer to
    the 19 inch. I just feel that I get more monuverability and feel
    more comfortable on a 16t inch. I like bikes that are a bit smaller
    than what normally I should be useing.

    Do you guys ride bikes that are the perfect fit for your height or do
    you guys ride bikes that are smaller and why?

    Thanks,

    James

  11. Some of the new frames have top bars that go lower instead of being parallel
    to the ground. I would simply draw an imaginary
    line and take mesures from there. This is a rule of thumb so you can do
    what you feel best with it 😉 Either use a bigger frame
    since you now have more clearance, you take the smaller one. Bike selection
    is also a personnal thing 😉 As long as you have
    those 2 inches I would say you are ok... less and you might not be happy
    next time you fall ... some parts of you might give
    you a painfull reminder of this rule of thumb too 😉

    "Jim Gosse" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What if we are talking about a compact frame? I have a size 55 Specialized
    Allez. I have more than 2" from the cross bar to my crotch, but I am


    pretty

    Quoted message said:

    sure the bike fits me.

    By the way James, don't get mixed up in comfortable, and familiar. You may
    be more used to the feel of a smaller bike, but it may prevent you from
    getting the most out of your effort.

    Jim

    "Daniel Crispin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello James,

    when you have both feet on the ground, there should be a 2 inch


    clearance

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    between the top bar of the frame and yourself. Less is dangerous, more


    will

    Quoted message said:

    make adjusting the rest more complicated. In essence the bigger the


    bike,

    Quoted message said:

    faster you can go with the same effort. Think of those BMX bikes, even


    with

    Quoted message said:

    great effort they can't go that fast.

    "James Lynx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I recently tried some bikes. A 19 inch frame is my proper size but
    when I try a 16 inch frame it doesn't feel really small to me but the
    bike shop owner and my girlfriend say that a 16 inch frame looks small
    for my height. That may seem true but I felt more comfortable on a 16
    than 19 inch frame. It could be because I used to ride BMX and those
    are tiny. Sure I'm 6 foot tall and can not ride BMX anymore but the
    16 inch bike is between the BMX size and 19 inch frame, but closer to
    the 19 inch. I just feel that I get more monuverability and feel
    more comfortable on a 16t inch. I like bikes that are a bit smaller
    than what normally I should be useing.

    Do you guys ride bikes that are the perfect fit for your height or do
    you guys ride bikes that are smaller and why?

    Thanks,

    James

  12. Well, that is true, the 2 inches rule can be adapted depending what you do
    on the bike too.

    "David Kerber" <ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello James,

    when you have both feet on the ground, there should be a 2 inch


    clearance

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    between the top bar of the frame and yourself. Less is dangerous, more


    will

    Quoted message said:


    I disagree somewhat on this. On a MTB, I would say *at least* 2 inches,
    but on a road bike 1" is enough.

    ....

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
    newsgroups if possible).

  13. Daniel Crispin said:

    Well, that is true, the 2 inches rule can be adapted depending what
    you do on the bike too.

    Family newsgroup, buddy.

    Bill "he's a top-poster; he deserved it" S.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.