UK and Europe · Public discussion

Bike size ID

Started by Roos Eisma · · Last activity · 7 posts · 350 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
10 June 2007
Last activity
11 June 2007
Original author
Roos Eisma
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
350
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have been looking for a sensible mountain bike for a while,
    mainly for riding up landrover tracks to save us a long walk-in, but maybe
    the odd offroad bike tour as well though probably all very benign.
    Front sus, nothing silly for the rest, and preferably not made of cheese
    or falling to bits after the first use. Second (or more) hand probably.

    I have just come across a Trek 4100 on Ebay but the seller did not list
    the frame size:

    http://i15.ebayimg.com/05/i/000/a3/56/9b2c_1.JPG

    (Item 170119402747)

    I have emailed the seller to ask how tall the previous owner was (and/or
    his leg length) but no reply as yet, and the auction ends this evening.

    Looking at various photographs of bikes of that series (4100, 4300, 4500)
    I guess the frame is probably quite large, maybe at least 19.5", but maybe
    someone with more experience in the group can make a better guess?

    I am probably looking for 18" though I can probably do OK with 19.5", but
    certainly not any larger. I am 5'9.5" with a 33" inseam.

    Thanks, Roos

  2. Quoted message said:

    I am probably looking for 18" though I can probably do OK with 19.5", but
    certainly not any larger. I am 5'9.5" with a 33" inseam.

    Thanks, Roos

    If you're looking for a mountain bike and are 5'9.5" then you should
    really be looking at something like a 17" frame.

    17" tends to be the "medium" frame size for a lot of manufacturers. Try
    a few out in the shops before you buy. A 19.5" frame would probably be
    more suited to someone taller.

    Don't forget, the fit for a mtb is different to fit for a road bike, as
    the geomtries are totally different.

    What's your budget by the way? There's a FAQ on the WhatMTB website with
    decent beginner bikes listed at lots of price points.

    http://www.whatmtb.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=17175

    Have a look and see if it helps

    R

  3. Random said:
    Quoted message said:

    I am probably looking for 18" though I can probably do OK with 19.5", but
    certainly not any larger. I am 5'9.5" with a 33" inseam.

    Quoted message said:

    If you're looking for a mountain bike and are 5'9.5" then you should
    really be looking at something like a 17" frame.

    Quoted message said:

    17" tends to be the "medium" frame size for a lot of manufacturers. Try
    a few out in the shops before you buy. A 19.5" frame would probably be
    more suited to someone taller.

    Quoted message said:

    Don't forget, the fit for a mtb is different to fit for a road bike, as
    the geomtries are totally different.

    I played around with some online calculators, and one came up with
    16.5-18.5" and the other with 17-18". The Trek 4100 comes in 16" or
    18", so that's how I ended up with 18" I think. But I'll keep in mind that
    going up to 19.5" may not be the best idea. And the one in the picture
    looks to me like it is at least that size so probably better not.

    Quoted message said:

    What's your budget by the way? There's a FAQ on the WhatMTB website with
    decent beginner bikes listed at lots of price points.

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.whatmtb.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=17175

    Budget is preferably under £100, so I'm looking at a second hand most
    basic 'proper' entry bike. It's not going to be used that much. I'll just
    keep my eyes open for something in our part of the country that fits the
    criteria.

    I haven't really been looking that hard, just whenever I come across an ad
    somewhere I have a look but so far they're all cheese or way too serious
    and expensive or very small...

    Roos

  4. Roos Eisma wrote on 10/06/2007 17:19 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    I am probably looking for 18" though I can probably do OK with 19.5", but
    certainly not any larger. I am 5'9.5" with a 33" inseam.

    Looks like 18" - 19" centre to centre from a quick comparison with the
    wheel diameter

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  5. Roos Eisma said:

    I haven't really been looking that hard, just whenever I come across an ad
    somewhere I have a look but so far they're all cheese or way too serious
    and expensive or very small...

    Roos

    Good luck - You could try the bikemagic and whatmtb forums - They have
    classifieds in there, wanted ads too.

    R

  6. in message <[email hidden]>, Roos Eisma

    (') said:

    I played around with some online calculators, and one came up with
    16.5-18.5" and the other with 17-18". The Trek 4100 comes in 16" or
    18", so that's how I ended up with 18" I think.

    Mountain bike geometries from different makers are quite different. You
    really need to try one.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    Ring of great evil
    Small one casts it into flame
    Bringing rise of Men ;; gonzoron

  7. Simon Brooke said:

    Mountain bike geometries from different makers are quite different. You
    really need to try one.

    Well, it's been bought now, and we'll pick it up later this week and see...

    On the one hand it might not be perfect, but (a) if it's all wrong it
    should be okay to sell it on but more likely (b) it's mainly only going
    to be used for occasional XC forays on landy tracks in lieu of boring
    walk-ins so it should be fine for that (at least as good as my old rigid
    EBC C-400), and really not much point worrying about spending 2-3 times
    as much just to tick some more boxes.
    High use and technicality would be a different matter, but this is a
    couple of trips a year and mainly something to take tractor tyres and
    not fall to bits.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.