Bike love gone wrong

The pavement dude concerns me... concrete rash anyone?

On Oct 28, 10:48 am, gplama <gplama.2z4...@no-

mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

The pavement dude concerns me... concrete rash anyone?

He'll need some mefix 🙂

On Oct 27, 11:55 pm, cfsmtb <cfsmtb.2z4...@no-

mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

OMGWTFBBQ

http://tinyurl.com/35mzyo

Actually the most disturbing detail is the articles final sentence, it
sounds like a unfinished sketch from Little Britain.

--
cfsmtb

Reminds me of "Hump a Hummer", but I wish it didn't. The Hummer is
coming down under.

Donga said:

Reminds me of "Hump a Hummer", but I wish it didn't. The Hummer is
coming down under.

They are already here.

cfsmtb said:

OMGWTFBBQ

http://tinyurl.com/35mzyo

Actually the most disturbing detail is the articles final sentence, it
sounds like a unfinished sketch from Little Britain.

the thing that really concerns me is the debashment of the "Sex
Offenders List". I thought this was a list of people who could be
considered a danger to other peope. It seems to have become (over there)
a list of people who do not have poltically correct sex. Is it the same
here?

Terryc said:

cfsmtb said:

OMGWTFBBQ

Quoted message said:

http://tinyurl.com/35mzyo

Quoted message said:

Actually the most disturbing detail is the articles final sentence, it
sounds like a unfinished sketch from Little Britain.

the thing that really concerns me is the debashment of the "Sex
Offenders List". I thought this was a list of people who could be
considered a danger to other peope. It seems to have become (over there)
a list of people who do not have poltically correct sex. Is it the same
here?

I was thinking that too. What consenting adults do together or when
alone in their room behind locked doors should never be a concern of
the state. The charge would seem wholly appropriate if he was doing
it in public place or with a minor or in any way that would cause
physical or psychological harm to anyone else, but the facts of the
case are that some guy was caught with his pants down alone in his
room with the door locked, by a couple of cleaners who entered using a
master key. Terribly embarrassing I'm sure, but hardly a threat to
society and clearly not with the intent to harm anyone else.

Travis

Travis said:

Terryc said:

cfsmtb said:

OMGWTFBBQ

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://tinyurl.com/35mzyo

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Actually the most disturbing detail is the articles final sentence, it
sounds like a unfinished sketch from Little Britain.

Quoted message said:

the thing that really concerns me is the debashment of the "Sex
Offenders List". I thought this was a list of people who could be
considered a danger to other peope. It seems to have become (over there)
a list of people who do not have poltically correct sex. Is it the same
here?

I was thinking that too. What consenting adults do together or when
alone in their room behind locked doors should never be a concern of
the state. The charge would seem wholly appropriate if he was doing
it in public place or with a minor or in any way that would cause
physical or psychological harm to anyone else, but the facts of the
case are that some guy was caught with his pants down alone in his
room with the door locked, by a couple of cleaners who entered using a
master key. Terribly embarrassing I'm sure, but hardly a threat to
society and clearly not with the intent to harm anyone else.

Travis

Do you reckon they would have charged him if he'd merely been engaged
in a bit of old-fashioned Onanism?

Regardless, when he gets sentenced I expect he's looking at a stiff
penal stretch.

BTH

BT Humble said:

Do you reckon they would have charged him if he'd merely been engaged
in a bit of old-fashioned Onanism?

Regardless, when he gets sentenced I expect he's looking at a stiff
penal stretch.

In a State penetration centre :-)

--

Travis said:

Terribly embarrassing I'm sure, but hardly a threat to
society and clearly not with the intent to harm anyone else.

Cheap laughs aside, seriously what is the moral dilemma? The cleaners could of just left it with a mildly funny anecdote, why further inform the hotel manager & the cops? The other issue regarding interfering with pavements is more of a worry, ie: committing a public nuisance & just plain icky.

Although the English may have a thing about bike love, recall this ad from UK FoE a few years ago?

On Oct 28, 10:33 pm, cfsmtb <cfsmtb.2z5...@no-

mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

Travis said:

Terribly embarrassing I'm sure, but hardly a threat to
society and clearly not with the intent to harm anyone else.

Cheap laughs aside, seriously what is the moral dilemma? The cleaners
could of just left it with a mildly funny anecdote, why further inform
the hotel manager & the cops? The other issue regarding interfering with
pavements is more of a worry, ie: committing a public nuisance & just
plain icky.

Although the English may have a thing about bike love, recall this ad
from UK FoE a few years ago?

--
cfsmtb

Surely you have just been spoofed?

Donga

cfsmtb said:

Travis said:

Terribly embarrassing I'm sure, but hardly a threat to
society and clearly not with the intent to harm anyone else.

Cheap laughs aside, seriously what is the moral dilemma? The cleaners
could of just left it with a mildly funny anecdote, why further inform
the hotel manager & the cops?

Lots of Calvinists up in Scotland, I hear that they're nearly as bad
as far-right fundamentalist Xtains on what they see as "moral" issues.

BTH

Donga said:

Surely you have just been spoofed?

Donga

You've got a point there, but as BTH mentions, some folks do get their arses bent out of shape over what should remain personal matters. Oh dear, bad puns again.

cfsmtb said:

OMGWTFBBQ

http://tinyurl.com/35mzyo

Actually the most disturbing detail is the articles final sentence, it
sounds like a unfinished sketch from Little Britain.

A pavement you can understand.

But hard to understand the problem with someone behind a locked door.

dewatf.

cfsmtb said:

Cheap laughs aside, seriously what is the moral dilemma?

if it's a steel frame he'll rust the tubes.