UK and Europe · Public discussion

bike insurance

Started by Michael Klontzas · · Last activity · 15 posts · 1,127 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
15 December 2005
Last activity
21 December 2005
Original author
Michael Klontzas
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,127
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Lately, I've been shopping around for bike insurance and as I found out,
    invariably the devil is in the details. I thought some of you might find
    the following responses from Butterworth Insurance (the people behind
    Cyclecover, the CTC/LCC recommended policy) enlightening. These selective
    quotes come from an email reply to my request for clarifications:

    Quoted message said:

    If the cycle is left out in the open after 2300 and a theft occurs
    the cycle will not be covered except whilst touring.

    No drink-up for some of us then!

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Approved security marking is when the insured cycle is fitted with an
    electronic datatag ie., stoptheft, alpha dot etc., (micro chip is
    fitted in the frame of the cycle). The discount will not be given if
    the insured cycle is only postcoded, marked or etched by the Police,
    Homewatch Association or similar organisation.

    At £11.95 inc p&p from
    http://www.stoptheft.co.uk/acatalog/forms/leisure.htm Stoptheft looks
    like a cost-effective alternative to expensive electronic datatagging
    anyway, and many insurance companies will offer discounts for that. It's
    supported by the police as well apparently. One concern is that the
    stickers, which is what the whole thing is mostly about anyway, may
    actually attract attention. And with a name like Stoptheft I wouldn't be
    surprised if some potential vandals took it personally! Has anyone used
    this product?

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Please note, accessories are only covered for theft if a total loss
    of cycle occurs.

    Hmm. The policy with the least strings attached I found is offered by ETA
    (Environmental Transport Association: http://www.eta.co.uk ). It is more
    expensive than most, but they offer some interesting extras like Cycle
    Rescue and a Personal Protection Package as standard. More importantly
    perhaps they seem to be more bike-friendly than others.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  2. Michael Klontzas said:
    Quoted message said:

    If the cycle is left out in the open after 2300 and a theft occurs
    the cycle will not be covered except whilst touring.

    No drink-up for some of us then!

    No problem. You're just doing a mini-tour to the pub and back. Who
    thinks up this wording, anyway? What is a tour? What magically
    happens at 2300 that doesn't at 2259?

    It seems many insurance companies try to assess risks about which they
    know absolutely nothing.

    By the way, I hear ETA is good (no 1st hand experience, though).

    PhilD

    --
    <><

  3. Michael Klontzas said:
    Quoted message said:

    Approved security marking is when the insured cycle is fitted with an
    electronic datatag ie., stoptheft, alpha dot etc., (micro chip is
    fitted in the frame of the cycle).

    They can't have thought about that very hard: the frame is about the
    cheapest component on my bike, thanks to the munificence of Taiwanese
    frames builders

  4. Michael Klontzas said:

    Lately, I've been shopping around for bike insurance and as I found out,
    invariably the devil is in the details. I thought some of you might find
    the following responses from Butterworth Insurance (the people behind
    Cyclecover, the CTC/LCC recommended policy) enlightening. These selective
    quotes come from an email reply to my request for clarifications:

    <snip>

    Load of bloody nonsense, and expensive too. Another interesting glitch
    is that Roos' bike would not be covered when locked down at the
    University (where she works) despite being in a cage with a limited
    number of keys as well as locked to stands inside, but if it was idly
    strapped to a lamp-post in a back street a few hundred meters away with
    no passing folk then it would be.

    <sigh>

    We're now covered through our house contents insurance, which appears to
    have a lot fewer strings attached and basically comes for free given
    we've got the house contents anyway.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  5. Peter Clinch said:

    We're now covered through our house contents insurance, which appears to
    have a lot fewer strings attached and basically comes for free given
    we've got the house contents anyway.

    My bike isurance doesn't have any such restrictions. It will pay up
    whenever whatever, no claims form or any such nonsense. It costs the
    interest on the value of the new bike per year. Yup, my bikes are
    'self-insured'. I see little point in paying 10% of the value to a
    company when I can save that money and get a new bike. Not that I have
    bought a new bike (for me) for the last 9 years..

    In that time I would have spent in excess of 1000 GBP on insurance.

    ...d

  6. David Martin wrote:

    I see little point in paying 10% of the value to a

    Quoted message said:

    company when I can save that money and get a new bike. Not that I have
    bought a new bike (for me) for the last 9 years..

    My bikes are not covered away from the house either. I looked at
    covering them under the house insurance but any policies including it
    were more expensive.
    Having never had a bike stolen. I'll take my chances. Having 100%
    secure parking at work helps. The only bike that is ever parked in
    higher risk areas is my commuter. I could easily replace it second hand
    for £100 if it did get stolen.

    Iain

  7. PhilD said:
    Michael Klontzas said:
    Quoted message said:

    If the cycle is left out in the open after 2300 and a theft occurs
    the cycle will not be covered except whilst touring.

    No drink-up for some of us then!

    No problem. You're just doing a mini-tour to the pub and back.

    They don't specify if this is GMT or BST either 😉

    Quoted message said:

    Who
    thinks up this wording, anyway? What is a tour? What magically
    happens at 2300 that doesn't at 2259?

    Whichever way you look at it, this curfew is silly. The idea is we should
    be in bed before midnight.

    Quoted message said:

    It seems many insurance companies try to assess risks about which they
    know absolutely nothing.

    By the way, I hear ETA is good (no 1st hand experience, though).

    Yes, so I hear too. They don't have too many get-out closes either.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  8. sothach said:
    Michael Klontzas said:
    Quoted message said:

    Approved security marking is when the insured cycle is fitted with an
    electronic datatag ie., stoptheft, alpha dot etc., (micro chip is
    fitted in the frame of the cycle).

    They can't have thought about that very hard: the frame is about the
    cheapest component on my bike, thanks to the munificence of Taiwanese
    frames builders

    The whole point is the stickers work as a deterrent. I would guess most
    thieves don't know much about bikes anyway. Then again, the stickers may
    attract attention to a bike I am trying to make look decisively naff by
    covering it in electricians tape (which is not as easy as I thought).

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  9. David Martin said:

    Peter Clinch wrote:
    Yup, my bikes are
    'self-insured'. I see little point in paying 10% of the value to a
    company when I can save that money and get a new bike. Not that I have
    bought a new bike (for me) for the last 9 years..

    In that time I would have spent in excess of 1000 GBP on insurance.

    That was exactly my approach too until a month ago when someone damaged
    my 4 months old bike beyond repair in an unsuccessful attempt to steal
    it. Now, I simply can't take the risk with the new one. I can't stand the
    thought of this happening again in another 4 months.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  10. Quoted message said:

    David Martin wrote:
    Having never had a bike stolen. I'll take my chances. Having 100%
    secure parking at work helps. The only bike that is ever parked in
    higher risk areas is my commuter. I could easily replace it second hand
    for £100 if it did get stolen.

    Another strategy is perhaps buying a Brompton as a lock-up-outside
    commuter bike and recovering the investment over a number of years you
    won't be paying for insurance.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  11. David Martin said:


    My bike isurance doesn't have any such restrictions. It will pay up
    whenever whatever, no claims form or any such nonsense. It costs the
    interest on the value of the new bike per year. Yup, my bikes are
    'self-insured'. I see little point in paying 10% of the value to a
    company when I can save that money and get a new bike. Not that I have
    bought a new bike (for me) for the last 9 years..

    In that time I would have spent in excess of 1000 GBP on insurance.

    Which is all well and good, but if the value of the bike(s) in
    question is significantly in excess of 1000 (like, say, 5000), then
    you may yet still turn out to have been better off if insured.
    Admittedly, if teh bike was 5000, you'd have saved more than 1000 in 9
    years.

    Having said which, most of the time my bikes have been uninsured (or
    so pitifully insured as to be effectively uninsured). FWIW, in my
    recent shopping around, if you have high value bikes, M&S seem to be
    the people to get your contents insurance with - they cover bikes with
    no limit (or a very very high limit, I forget which). However, their
    premium was about three times the cost of the insurance I've ended up
    with, which is adequate for most of my bikes (will pay out up to 1000,
    per bike, so only the trice is not fully insured). Co-op (previously
    recommended hereabouts) had a very low limit by default, and an
    inability to provide full cover regardless of premium.

    A Lloyds name once told me never to insure anything you can afford to
    replace ... but I do.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  12. Quoted message said:

    What magically
    happens at 2300 that doesn't at 2259?

    You magically stagger out of the pub at 23:20 to find the bike has been
    nicked. Insurance company then doesn't have to pay up.

    They have 23:00 as the time 'cos they're not cyclists, and so drink
    inferior beers that aren't worth taking the full drinking up time to
    finish.

  13. Ian Smith said:

    FWIW, in my
    recent shopping around, if you have high value bikes, M&S seem to be
    the people to get your contents insurance with - they cover bikes with
    no limit (or a very very high limit, I forget which).

    £4K

    Quoted message said:

    However, their
    premium was about three times the cost of the insurance I've ended up
    with

    These things are always a bit of a lottery: with us, M&S weren't
    significantly more even before we took the bikes into account, and quite
    a bit less than renewing our Direct Line policy which had shot up in
    cost apropos of, errrr, nothing obvious at all.

    So get your quotes in and see how they're doing today! It's almost as
    much fun as getting an Inter City rail ticket by 'phoning them up and
    multiple times and playing Double Or Quits on the variously cheap quotes
    you get...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  14. Peter Clinch said:

    So get your quotes in and see how they're doing today! It's almost as
    much fun as getting an Inter City rail ticket by 'phoning them up and
    multiple times and playing Double Or Quits on the variously cheap quotes
    you get...

    Another interesting alternative is here http://tinyurl.com/dr4c5

    Vouchers? £169.99? Err, maybe not.

    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

  15. Michael Klontzas said:
    Peter Clinch said:

    So get your quotes in and see how they're doing today! It's almost as
    much fun as getting an Inter City rail ticket by 'phoning them up and
    multiple times and playing Double Or Quits on the variously cheap quotes
    you get...

    Another interesting alternative is here http://tinyurl.com/dr4c5

    Vouchers? £169.99? Err, maybe not.

    I get the following error:

    403 Forbidden
    You may not view this page as your browser does not have the 12'
    BARGEPOLE plugin.

    ...d

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Michael Klontzas
    'If everything seems to be coming your way,
    you're probably in the wrong lane'
    (Borstelmann's Rule)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.