UK and Europe · Public discussion

Bike Fitting by Peter White

Started by Iarocu · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,588 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
19 August 2003
Last activity
21 August 2003
Original author
Iarocu
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,588
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm Good article on bike fit with good argument/method for fore/aft
    saddle position. cheers Iain C

  2. With regards to crank length, the article ignores the plasticity of muscles. We all know that
    muscles change their shape depending on the type of exercise that we demand of them (compare the
    shape of body builders with marathon athletes for an obvious example). Muscle plasticity is not
    limited to fibre types and to muscle thickness, but the muscle length and the position of attachment
    to the tendons and bone also changes with exercise. Over a period of weeks or months, the leg
    muscles will adapt to provide optimal performance on your usual bicycle, so that crank length may
    matter very little. Changing your crank length from 175 to 170 mm, or the reverse, may be equally
    unpleasant in the short term, until your muscles adapt. Long term perfomance will hardly be
    affected. Intensity of training and fitness are much bigger factors. So, just keep cycling and don't
    change your bike settings too often.

    Mike

    "iarocu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm Good article on bike fit with good argument/method for
    fore/aft saddle


    position.

    Quoted message said:

    cheers Iain C

  3. To illustrate that point, I raised the saddle on my mountain bike by about one inch since I was
    getting groin ache and a pain in my right knee evey time I went out on it. I made this change last
    Tuesday. I have been right as rain since then. Amazing difference.

    Slim

    "maf" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    With regards to crank length, the article ignores the plasticity of


    muscles.

    Quoted message said:

    We all know that muscles change their shape depending on the type of exercise that we demand of
    them (compare the shape of body builders with marathon athletes for an obvious example). Muscle
    plasticity is not


    limited

    Quoted message said:

    to fibre types and to muscle thickness, but the muscle length and the position of attachment to
    the tendons and bone also changes with exercise. Over a period of weeks or months, the leg muscles
    will adapt to provide optimal performance on your usual bicycle, so that crank length may matter
    very little. Changing your crank length from 175 to 170 mm, or the


    reverse,

    Quoted message said:

    may be equally unpleasant in the short term, until your muscles adapt.


    Long

    Quoted message said:

    term perfomance will hardly be affected. Intensity of training and fitness are much bigger
    factors. So, just keep cycling and don't change your bike settings too often.

    Mike

    "iarocu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm Good article on bike fit with good argument/method for
    fore/aft saddle


    position.

    Quoted message said:

    cheers Iain C

  4. "iarocu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm Good article on bike fit with good argument/method for
    fore/aft saddle


    position.

    Thanks for the link. Having suffered a lot with aching wrists I found the bit about seating of
    interest. When I checked my bike (which is a little unusual in having a 74 degree seat tube), I
    noticed that my saddle was as far forward as it could be. Moving it back has definitely
    improved things.

    Tim

  5. (iarocu) said:

    www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm

    Ah, I thought you meant the BBCs disability correspondent, the excellent - er - Peter White.

    See also wrenchscience.comwrenchscience.com

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com New!
    Improved!! Now with added extra Demon!

  6. "Tim Downie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "iarocu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm Good article on bike fit with good argument/method for
    fore/aft saddle


    position.

    Thanks for the link. Having suffered a lot with aching wrists I found the bit about seating of
    interest. When I checked my bike (which is a little unusual in having a 74 degree seat tube), I
    noticed that my saddle was as far forward as it could be. Moving it back has definitely improved


    things.

    Quoted message said:


    Tim


    Good site - interesting reading, I got my made to measure done by Omega Cycles who essentially sit
    you on a jig using you choice of shoes and pedals if poss. and move stuff (Tm) around till you feel
    comfortable. I also paid £30 for a Bio-racer fit which was a useful starting point. However to
    emphasise Peter's point an awful lot depends on personal taste and physical ability (e.g upper back
    problem) as well as simple bodily measurements.

    Additionally it is the first site to clearly answer the front chainring compatibility questions. I
    run a Campag racing triple on my audax bike and would like to drop the inside 30 to 28. Now I know
    what will fit!

    HTH Julia

  7. iarocu said:

    www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm Good article on bike fit with good argument/method for
    fore/aft saddle position.

    I was trying to remember the URL for this site a few months ago when posting stuff about someone's
    problem with excess pressure on the hands. Now added to favourites - thankyou. Its good advice, if
    you ask me.

    --
    Jim Price

    jimprice.dsl.pipex.comjimprice.dsl.pipex.com

    Conscientious objection is hard work in an economic war.

  8. "the Baker-Bealls" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Tim Downie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "iarocu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm Good article on bike fit with good argument/method for
    fore/aft saddle


    position.

    Thanks for the link. Having suffered a lot with aching wrists I found the bit about seating of
    interest. When I checked my bike (which is a little unusual in having a 74 degree seat tube), I
    noticed that my saddle was as far forward as it could be. Moving it back has definitely improved


    things.

    Quoted message said:


    Tim


    Good site - interesting reading, I got my made to measure done by Omega Cycles who essentially
    sit you on a jig using you choice of shoes and pedals if poss. and move stuff (Tm) around till
    you feel comfortable. I also paid £30 for a Bio-racer fit which was a useful starting point.
    However to emphasise Peter's point an awful lot depends on personal taste and physical ability
    (e.g upper back problem) as well as simple bodily measurements.

    Additionally it is the first site to clearly answer the front chainring compatibility questions. I
    run a Campag racing triple on my audax bike and would like to drop the inside 30 to 28. Now I know
    what will fit!

    HTH Julia

    My problem getting bikes to fit is normally handlebar height. I like the bars more or less level
    with the saddle. I,m 6ft3 so I can always get frames where the saddle goes high enough although
    close to the limit but normally have to change the stem. The MTB I bought fits now. But only after
    fitting a new stem - to shorten reach and a Zoom adjuster (which raises bars on Ahead stems by 2"😉.
    The pedals and saddle were changed as well as both were a touch narrow as I,m wider than average as
    well. The bike was a good deal reduced from £450 to £299 so I,m not complaining but I wouldn,t be
    surprised if many people are put off cycling by an uncomfortable riding position. Would it not be
    worthwhile for more manufacturers to market bikes with adjustable stems. It would be a minimal cost
    to the factory. cheers Iain C

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.