Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Bike article from News.com

Started by 1id10t · · Last activity · 7 posts · 2,193 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
7 December 2005
Last activity
8 December 2005
Original author
1id10t
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,193
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Read this today on News.com. If only Iemma and Tripodi were so open to alternatives.

    "QUEENSLAND is considering radical suggestions to get people out of cars back and on to bikes and public transport.
    These would include tax breaks, offering money to owners of old cars to get rid of them and arranging bus pick-ups by mobile phone.

    Last week Premier Peter Beattie called on the Federal Government to include bicycles, cycling equipment and public transport fares in salary packaging schemes.

    "Salary packaging of bikes and public transport attracts fringe benefits tax, but why should they be treated differently from cars, mobile phones and laptop computers?" he said

    A policy options paper to ease city parking congestion being looked at by Mr Beattie has also suggested handing up to $500 to owners of pre-1987 cars to spend on a bicycle or free registration on a newer, smaller car.

    The paper also proposes the creation of cyclists' hubs where riders could lock up their bikes and shower or change at the end of a journey.

    The paper also proposes a parking tax with licences issued annually to people who park in the city.

    "We are relying on our cars more and more to get around," Mr Beattie said.

    "If this trend continues, traffic conditions will worsen, air quality will deteriorate, travel times will go up and quality of life will go down."

    Mr Beattie said the ideas were options, and no policy decisions had been made.

    But RACQ spokesman Ken Willett called the options paper "ideological claptrap", which would do nothing to ease peak-hour congestion.

    "It's a blueprint for a centrally planned utopia where we all live like rats in high-rises, walk to the shops, walk to the bus and ride our bikes to the sprocket factory," he said.

    Bicycle Queensland manager Ben Wilson welcomed the proposal for infrastructure support for cyclists.

    By David Southwell and Malcolm Cole of The Courier Mail"

    Full story can be found on following link - http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17478746-421,00.html

  2. I don't understand why the RACQ want more cars on the road. Sure, it is in their charter to look after the interests of those who choose to drive, but drivers will be better off if other people leave their cars at home. Beattie has not proposed any measures discouraging driving, he is merely promoting other transport.
    I, for one, find it hard to be inclined to listen to motorists' groups at all if they can only be knee-jerk reactionaries.

  3. RACQ = Royal Automobile Club of Queensland
    Car owners and drivers are members of the RACQ = revenue
    Cyclists are not = no revenue

    The RACQ had some anti-cyclist hype in one of their recent magazines.

  4. Greenboy said:


    The RACQ had some anti-cyclist hype in one of their recent magazines.


    I'm sure the average car driver is too smart to fall for that [censored]. Well, here's hoping.

  5. Greenboy said:

    RACQ = Royal Automobile Club of Queensland
    Car owners and drivers are members of the RACQ = revenue
    Cyclists are not = no revenue

    The RACQ had some anti-cyclist hype in one of their recent magazines.


    How many cyclists actually have no car and pay no fees to their motoring association? Not many, in my experience. More cyclists on the road does not necessarily mean less revenue for the RACQ.

  6. mezzinator said:

    I'm sure the average car driver is too smart to fall for that [censored]. Well, here's hoping.


    Ahhh, the sharp scythe of irony....

  7. artemidorus - my cycling habit means we need to own only one car. (a large petrol guzzling 4wd :o ). At least we don't pay for road service on a second car. And the petrol guzzling 4wd provides road service for the bike.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.