Quoted post said:Originally posted by shaneo
right.....all you bike salesmen and lightweight riders please take a break and sit at the back of the bunch!!!!....what I want to hear from is that class of rider who is 90kgs and above....and measures 6 foot 3 and above.....
I have been through a couple of cannondale caad frames (3 & 5) and have started looking around for a new frame....think I might try something different.....but what????
I seem to have a few problems finding a frame similar to the 63cm cannondale.......
I know giant and specialised do big frames....but how do they perform for the big fella's???? (ie compact frames - carbon)
please dont bother posting b/s about certain frame makes that dont make large frames....i have been around long enough to know if the frame dont fit
I'm 6'4"+ and 97kgs (lean) and have had a couple of different 'fit-kits' done, including Bioracer.... and not one came out with measurements for a frame bigger than 61cm. ...... A big bike (63, 64cm +) has gotta be made for spiders or freaks in my opinion. Although, whilst I'm tall, I'm quite proportionate?
There's nothing wrong with having a bit of extra seatpost sticking out. A slightly smaller frame with well fitted stem etc (in my opinion) feels a lot more nimble than the big, sparse, traditional geometry frames.
Top tube length is the most important though, and unless you're doing it right and having a custom job done, check the geometries of the manufacturers to see who comes up with the tt(c-c / virtual c-c) that suits best.
I'm waiting on an XXL Guerciotti (virtual seat tube = 61cm) being made at the moment. I chose for the frame with a 4cm sloping tt. Helps keep the aesthetics of the bike in balance, as well as maintaining a rigid formation. TT length was nice, dialed in with a 130mm stem. By the way....... awesome package.
The fully sloping frames of Giants etc just didn't feel right, although from memory, the big Giants had a really long (possibly suitable?) virtual top tube length.
C.