Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Big fat wheels for cyclocross

Started by Squat'n Dive · · Last activity · 11 posts · 964 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
28 January 2008
Last activity
1 February 2008
Original author
Squat'n Dive
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
964
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim
    on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?
    What are my options for a fat stiff cyclocross rim, pref 36 double
    eyelet (rear) that can
    take tires from 622-23 up to 622-45? Is there such a versatile rim?
    Options for a rim like that with ceramic breaking surface and lower
    eyelet count
    (front)?

  2. Squat'n Dive said:

    After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim
    on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?

    At marshmallow pressures, surely not, but it's still not a great idea
    to have too narrow of a rim for a tire, if ya want stability. Sun
    Rhynolite and Alex DM18 are two that are simple, strong, and
    inexpensive--however, neither will do well with a tire narrower than
    28mm as far as I can remember. But, then again, who wants to put <28s
    on a cross bike anyway?

  3. Squat'n Dive said:


    After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?

    Nope.

    A larger tire protects the rim by attenuating peak loads from bumps
    and landings. You have to use lower pressure than you would in a
    narrow tire to realize the benefits of a fatter one.

    Quoted message said:

    What are my options for a fat stiff cyclocross rim, pref 36 double
    eyelet (rear) that can take tires from 622-23 up to 622-45?

    If you want to use 700x23 tires, you'll need a rim no wider than about
    21mm. That pretty much eliminates touring rims as a category. If you
    want a much stronger rim than the CXP-33 that will still work with
    23mm tires, the Velocity Deep-V is a good choice.

    The Alex Crostini R1.1 and R1.2 (with offset spoke holes) look good
    and come from what I consider to be today's best rim maker. I have
    not tried either of those rims in particular, though.

    Chalo

  4. Chalo said:

    The Alex Crostini R1.1 and R1.2 (with offset spoke holes) look good
    and come from what I consider to be today's best rim maker. I have
    not tried either of those rims in particular, though.

    I've made a minor effort to try and locate some when I'd first seen
    them on the alexrims.com site--as indeed, if they're Alex quality with
    offset drilling, it's a win-win. No luck. I have seen them as OEM on a
    few flat-bar bikes at the LBS. Good stuff, if you can source them.

  5. Squat'n Dive said:

    After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim
    on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?

    Real cyclocross, or just a CX bike for other purposes? You can't race
    on anything bigger than 35 anyway. For other uses, see the Mavic
    pressure chart which shows safe working pressure against tyre width;
    it can be found as a label on some Mavic rims, e.g. my Open Pros have
    a label saying 10bar/19mm to 8bar/28mm. That suggests a maximum of
    5bar on a 38, should you be minded to fit such fat treads to skinny
    rims.

    You need a wider rim for tyres over 28mm according to Mavic, although
    plenty of people get away with 30-32mm CX tyres on rims optimised for
    23mm road race rubber. If you're going up to 38-45mm tyres, you
    definitely need a wide touring rim, as those kind of tyres will have
    been designed to operate best off a wider base.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  6. A tyre is basically a cylindrical pressure vessel, which means that for a
    given pressure, the stress on the rim is proportional to the diameter of the
    tyre. So, for example, if you pump 19mm and 38mm tyres to the same pressure,
    the stress on the rim is double with the 38mm tyre. Conversely, a 38mm tyre
    at 60psi puts the same stress on the rim as a 19mm tyre at 120 psi...

    Nick

    "Squat'n Dive" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim
    on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?
    What are my options for a fat stiff cyclocross rim, pref 36 double
    eyelet (rear) that can
    take tires from 622-23 up to 622-45? Is there such a versatile rim?
    Options for a rim like that with ceramic breaking surface and lower
    eyelet count
    (front)?

  7. Kinky Cowboy said:

    On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:55:41 -0800 (PST), "Squat'n Dive"

    Quoted message said:

    After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim
    on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?

    Real cyclocross, or just a CX bike for other purposes? You can't race
    on anything bigger than 35 anyway. For other uses, see the Mavic
    pressure chart which shows safe working pressure against tyre width;
    it can be found as a label on some Mavic rims, e.g. my Open Pros have
    a label saying 10bar/19mm to 8bar/28mm. That suggests a maximum of
    5bar on a 38, should you be minded to fit such fat treads to skinny
    rims.

    You need a wider rim for tyres over 28mm according to Mavic, although
    plenty of people get away with 30-32mm CX tyres on rims optimised for
    23mm road race rubber.

    Most CX racers that I know use standard road rims like Open Pros and
    CPX 33s -- at least the ones who use ordinary OTC rims and not the
    spendy botique wheels. I have seen plenty of cross riders running
    30+mm tires on some pretty expensive road race wheels. Personally, I
    use Open Pros on my cross bike with 32mm tires. -- Jay Beattie.

  8. Kinky Cowboy said:

    On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:55:41 -0800 (PST), "Squat'n Dive"

    Quoted message said:

    After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim
    on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?

    Real cyclocross, or just a CX bike for other purposes? You can't race

    CX bike for road going with wide winter spiked tires. I don't race,
    just pedal semi-hard.

    Quoted message said:

    on anything bigger than 35 anyway. For other uses, see the Mavic
    pressure chart which shows safe working pressure against tyre width;
    it can be found as a label on some Mavic rims, e.g. my Open Pros have
    a label saying 10bar/19mm to 8bar/28mm. That suggests a maximum of
    5bar on a 38, should you be minded to fit such fat treads to skinny
    rims.

    You need a wider rim for tyres over 28mm according to Mavic, although
    plenty of people get away with 30-32mm CX tyres on rims optimised for
    23mm road race rubber. If you're going up to 38-45mm tyres, you
    definitely need a wide touring rim, as those kind of tyres will have
    been designed to operate best off a wider base.

    Are there cyclocross events scheduled in winter? If not
    i guess that'd explain the lack of cyclocross specific rims.
    I assume there are some stiff touring rims available among the
    Velocity Deep-V, Alex Crostini R1.1 and R1.2, Sun
    Rhynolite, Alex DM18 and whatever else was recommended?
    Something as stiff as CXP-33 or at least OpenPro perhaps?

  9. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Squat'n Dive said:
    Kinky Cowboy said:

    On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:55:41 -0800 (PST), "Squat'n Dive"

    Quoted message said:

    After seeing the rim failure thread I'm a bit worried preparing to run
    a Mavic CXP-33 rim
    on a cyclocross bike I'm about to order.
    Would a 622x38 or 45 cause the extra load on the rim and a premature
    rim failure?

    Real cyclocross, or just a CX bike for other purposes? You can't race

    CX bike for road going with wide winter spiked tires. I don't race,
    just pedal semi-hard.

    Quoted message said:

    on anything bigger than 35 anyway. For other uses, see the Mavic
    pressure chart which shows safe working pressure against tyre width;
    it can be found as a label on some Mavic rims, e.g. my Open Pros have
    a label saying 10bar/19mm to 8bar/28mm. That suggests a maximum of
    5bar on a 38, should you be minded to fit such fat treads to skinny
    rims.

    You need a wider rim for tyres over 28mm according to Mavic, although
    plenty of people get away with 30-32mm CX tyres on rims optimised for
    23mm road race rubber. If you're going up to 38-45mm tyres, you
    definitely need a wide touring rim, as those kind of tyres will have
    been designed to operate best off a wider base.

    Are there cyclocross events scheduled in winter? If not
    i guess that'd explain the lack of cyclocross specific rims.
    I assume there are some stiff touring rims available among the
    Velocity Deep-V, Alex Crostini R1.1 and R1.2, Sun
    Rhynolite, Alex DM18 and whatever else was recommended?
    Something as stiff as CXP-33 or at least OpenPro perhaps?

    "CX-specific rims" tend to be very light deep-section tubulars.
    Essentially, CXers repurpose highly aero rims for their own need
    (tubular, light, cut through mud). But that's racing gear.

    For the Rest of Us, "cyclocross" rims are some variation on either "your
    road rims with new tires" or "some reasonably tough 700c rim." For truly
    gonzo "CX" projects, the 29er is here to help.

    I get surprisingly usable traction with a set of 32 mm hybrid tires (WTB
    Allterrainasaurus) on my CX bike. I just used them to ride to work and
    back (a short 15-minute jaunt) today, after a half-metre of snow fell
    yesterday.

    Notably, the bike stops making forward progress once the wet snow comes
    up above the BB spindle. Maybe it was a traction issue.

    Bicycle tire rubber is very soft relative to car rubber, and I think the
    narrow profile helps in certain snow and slush conditions. Note that the
    prevailing circumstance locally is mucky slush, which is quite different
    from the kind of snow conditions you get at, say -10 C.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls."
    "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them."

  10. Ryan Cousineau said:

    Notably, the bike stops making forward progress once the wet snow comes
    up above the BB spindle. Maybe it was a traction issue.

    Maybe you need to improve the nivadynamics (sp?) of your bike by, say,
    adding a snow plough up front. (Of course the snow eats up momentum
    real fast and if there is enough snow to impede the pedalling motion,
    there's not much you can do. As far as I'm concerned, 10 cm or even the
    occasional 20 cm of fresh snow is fun to ride in, but that's where I
    draw the line.)

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (A R:nen) said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:

    Notably, the bike stops making forward progress once the wet snow comes
    up above the BB spindle. Maybe it was a traction issue.

    Maybe you need to improve the nivadynamics (sp?) of your bike by, say,
    adding a snow plough up front. (Of course the snow eats up momentum
    real fast and if there is enough snow to impede the pedalling motion,
    there's not much you can do. As far as I'm concerned, 10 cm or even the
    occasional 20 cm of fresh snow is fun to ride in, but that's where I
    draw the line.)

    An interesting suggestion, but I suspect the plow would increase the
    resistance of the snow without increasing the traction of the bike 🙂.

    I had a hilarious good time last year riding in nearly-as-deep powder,
    albeit mainly downhill.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls."
    "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.