Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Big Chainring Shifting woe fix.

Started by Paul Milner · · Last activity · 6 posts · 1,140 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
2 March 2003
Last activity
5 March 2003
Original author
Paul Milner
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,140
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Back in the mid-70's, when dinos ruled the earth. the current fad of the time was drilling out parts
    and cutting anthing off that seemed superfluous(sp?). This included the filing off of every other
    chainring tooth. It gave a little extra room for the chain to catch on the rings. All of a sudden,
    even poor shifting front deraillers worked better. Some times a lot better. I myself have
    filed/ground off each tooth above the spider arms on a Rans Rocket. 5 teeth max. It really helps the
    chain to engage quicker And if you are having the same type of problem on the big cog in the back,
    the same thing helps. Paul Milner

  2. I just paid 20$ for 54 teeth chainring. I'd like to try and fill some teeth down. Buy I just bought
    it -- what if it is a disaster.

    "Paul Milner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Back in the mid-70's, when dinos ruled the earth. the current fad of the time was drilling out
    parts and cutting anthing off that seemed superfluous(sp?). This included the filing off of every
    other chainring tooth. It gave a little extra room for the chain to catch on the rings. All of a
    sudden, even poor shifting front deraillers worked better. Some times a lot better. I myself have
    filed/ground off each tooth above the spider arms on a Rans Rocket. 5 teeth max. It really helps
    the chain to engage quicker And if you are having the same type of problem on the big cog in the
    back, the same thing helps. Paul Milner

  3. Another fix for big ring shifting is to bend about 5 teeth in towards the middle ring ,has the same
    effect, but can be bent back if you want. Ben Fox "Paul Milner" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Back in the mid-70's, when dinos ruled the earth. the current fad of the time was drilling out
    parts and cutting anthing off that seemed superfluous(sp?). This included the filing off of every
    other chainring tooth. It gave a little extra room for the chain to catch on the rings. All of a
    sudden, even poor shifting front deraillers worked better. Some times a lot better. I myself have
    filed/ground off each tooth above the spider arms on a Rans Rocket. 5 teeth max. It really helps
    the chain to engage quicker And if you are having the same type of problem on the big cog in the
    back, the same thing helps. Paul Milner

  4. "Alpha Beta" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I just paid 20$ for 54 teeth chainring. I'd like to try and fill some teeth down. Buy I just
    bought it -- what if it is a disaster.

    "Paul Milner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Back in the mid-70's, when dinos ruled the earth. the current fad of the time was drilling out
    parts and cutting anthing off that seemed superfluous(sp?). This included the filing off of
    every other chainring tooth. It gave a little extra room for the chain to catch on the rings.
    All of a sudden, even poor shifting front deraillers worked better. Some times a lot better. I
    myself have filed/ground off each tooth above the spider arms on a Rans Rocket. 5 teeth max. It
    really helps the chain to engage quicker And if you are having the same type of problem on the
    big cog in the back, the same thing helps. Paul Milner

    Hello Alpha-Beta, I have done this procedure many, many times over the course of some 30 years of
    mechanicing. It has never(!) had any bad effects. I wouldn't worry about a 54 tooth chainring giving
    you any shifting problems. The shifting problems start to appear around 57 teeth. FYI, many bikes in
    the 70s and 80s came with every other tooth on the big chainring(52t) gone anyway. Only helped to
    make for better shifting.

  5. Ben Fox said:

    Another fix for big ring shifting is to bend about 5 teeth in towards the middle ring ,has the same
    effect, but can be bent back if you want. Ben Fox


    I'm actually willing to try this but have a followup question.

    At good o'le Georgia Tech I was taught that contact (in this case chaing and ring) starts with 3
    points of contact and the items "collapse" as much as needed to support the contact.

    All that to ask "With fewer contact points (teeth) won't the remaining teeth AND the chain wear out
    quicker as each is taking more contact?

  6. Dave Miller <> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Ben Fox said:

    Another fix for big ring shifting is to bend about 5 teeth in towards the middle ring ,has the
    same effect, but can be bent back if you want. Ben Fox


    I'm actually willing to try this but have a followup question.

    At good o'le Georgia Tech I was taught that contact (in this case chaing and ring) starts with 3
    points of contact and the items "collapse" as much as needed to support the contact.

    All that to ask "With fewer contact points (teeth) won't the remaining teeth AND the chain wear
    out quicker as each is taking more contact?


    Hi Dave, What you say is true, however, remember that there are a lot of teeth on a chainring to
    wear down. If a chainring is missing a few teeth, it will still last for years. Paul

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.