Road Cycling · Public discussion

Bicyclist killed, trucker guilty

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 72 posts · 1,920 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
26 August 2004
Last activity
13 September 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
72
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,920
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 72
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Steinwedel vs. Yuba Trucking
    Settlement: $5,000,000
    Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. CV762894
    July 8, 1999
    Bicycle / Truck Accident

    Jeffrey Steinwedel was a 48 year-old computer engineer who worked
    often with the Pentagon and various military installations around the
    world. He was riding his bicycle along Stevens Canyon Road [below the
    dam] in Cupertino when he was run over and killed by a double-dump
    trailer which was trying to pass. When apprehended, the driver of the
    truck denied any involvement in the accident.

    Mrs. Steinwedel asked O'Reilly, Collins & Danko to investigate. The
    Firm immediately obtained a court order preserving the truck as
    evidence. Its subsequent inspection of the truck's trailer disclosed
    fibers from Mr. Steinwedel's clothing, and paint from his bicycle,
    proving that it was indeed the rig which struck Mr. Steinwedel. It
    was also clear from the accident reconstruction that there was more
    than enough room for the truck driver to safely pass Mr. Steinwedel.
    The Firm demonstrated that it was the driver's lack of experience and
    training, as well as his lack of concern for a bicycle rider, which
    were the sole causes of Mr. Steinwedel's death.

    Charges of vehicular manslaughter were brought against the truck
    driver. O'Reilly, Collins & Danko worked with the District Attorney
    to establish the evidence needed to identify and conclusively prove
    that the defendant's driver was indeed the one who had hit
    Mr. Steinwedel and that the accident was the driver's fault and not
    Mr. Steinwedel's. The driver was ultimately convicted.

    After the conviction, O'Reilly, Collins & Danko negotiated settlements
    against the driver's employer totaling $5,000,000.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  2. On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:58:03 GMT, [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Steinwedel vs. Yuba Trucking
    Settlement: $5,000,000
    Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. CV762894
    July 8, 1999
    Bicycle / Truck Accident

    Jeffrey Steinwedel was a 48 year-old computer engineer who worked
    often with the Pentagon and various military installations around the
    world. He was riding his bicycle along Stevens Canyon Road [below the
    dam] in Cupertino when he was run over and killed by a double-dump
    trailer which was trying to pass. When apprehended, the driver of the
    truck denied any involvement in the accident.


    ....

    Quoted message said:


    After the conviction, O'Reilly, Collins & Danko negotiated settlements
    against the driver's employer totaling $5,000,000.

    Just out of curiosity, how much of the $5,000,000 did the family get,
    and how much went to the lawyers?

    Email address works as is.

  3. Patrick Lamb said:

    On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:58:03 GMT, j
    Just out of curiosity, how much of the $5,000,000 did the family get,
    and how much went to the lawyers?

    Just out of curiosity, how much would the family have gotten without the lawyers? 😉

  4. The amount of work they had to do
    to convict this A-hole, would be well
    worth the money.

  5. Quoted message said:

    Steinwedel vs. Yuba Trucking
    Settlement: $5,000,000
    Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. CV762894
    July 8, 1999
    Bicycle / Truck Accident

    [Extensive narrative snipped]

    Jobst, is the July 1999 date the date of collision or the date of
    settlement? (If the collision is 1999 and the settlement recent news,
    then I understand, but if the settlement is 1999, why the posting today?)

    Nice to know that there's justice sometimes, though.

    Mark Janeba

  6. Mark Janeba said:
    Quoted message said:

    Steinwedel vs. Yuba Trucking Settlement: $5,000,000 Santa Clara
    County Superior Court, Case No. CV762894 July 8, 1999 Bicycle /
    Truck Accident

    [Extensive narrative snipped]

    Jobst, is the July 1999 date the date of collision or the date of
    settlement? (If the collision is 1999 and the settlement recent
    news, then I understand, but if the settlement is 1999, why the
    posting today?)

    The accident happened in 1999. There was extensive discussion in the
    bike newsgroups at the time.

    Quoted message said:

    Nice to know that there's justice sometimes, though.

    Indeed. Too bad $5,000,000 can't return a life, though. I'm sure the
    Steinwedel family would rather have him than the money.

  7. Mark Janeba said:
    Quoted message said:

    Steinwedel vs. Yuba Trucking
    Settlement: $5,000,000
    Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. CV762894
    July 8, 1999
    Bicycle / Truck Accident

    Quoted message said:

    [Extensive narrative snipped]

    Quoted message said:

    Jobst, is the July 1999 date the date of collision or the date of
    settlement? (If the collision is 1999 and the settlement recent news,
    then I understand, but if the settlement is 1999, why the posting today?)

    Quoted message said:

    Nice to know that there's justice sometimes, though.

    The date of the INCEDENT. It was no accident, the term used in the report.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  8. Tim McNamara said:
    Mark Janeba said:
    Quoted message said:

    Steinwedel vs. Yuba Trucking Settlement: $5,000,000 Santa Clara
    County Superior Court, Case No. CV762894 July 8, 1999 Bicycle /
    Truck Accident

    [Extensive narrative snipped]

    Jobst, is the July 1999 date the date of collision or the date of
    settlement? (If the collision is 1999 and the settlement recent
    news, then I understand, but if the settlement is 1999, why the
    posting today?)

    The accident happened in 1999. There was extensive discussion in the
    bike newsgroups at the time.

    The accident happened in 1996. See, for example

    http://www.svbcbikes.org/steinwedel.cgi

    Dennis Ferguson

  9. Carl Fogel said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Steinwedel vs. Yuba Trucking
    Settlement: $5,000,000
    Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. CV762894
    July 8, 1999
    Bicycle / Truck Accident

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [Extensive narrative snipped]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Jobst, is the July 1999 date the date of collision or the date of
    settlement? (If the collision is 1999 and the settlement recent
    news, then I understand, but if the settlement is 1999, why the
    posting today?)

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Nice to know that there's justice sometimes, though.

    Quoted message said:

    It's not clear even from the lawyer's description:

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.oreillylaw.com/personal_injury.htm

    Quoted message said:

    (Click on the "steinweidel" tab.)

    Quoted message said:

    But this 1999 post::

    Quoted message said:

    http://cycling.org/lists/av/archive/1999/1999-09/937719649000

    Quoted message said:

    mentions that Steinwedel was killed in December 1996 and the
    driver was convicted of misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter
    in September 1999.

    Quoted message said:

    And far down on the same page, a 1999 post says that:

    Quoted message said:

    "Yuba Trucking Co.'s insurance company recently paid $5 million to
    settle a lawsuit brought by Steinwedel's widow."

    Quoted message said:

    Jobst has posted before on Steinwedel's death.

    and I'm still unclear why this item appeared mow if it was settled in
    1999. As you say, the whole thing is unclear. I didn't find the item
    I posted, someone who knew I was interested in the outcome sent me the
    URL.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  10. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    The amount of work they had to do
    to convict this A-hole, would be well
    worth the money.

    "They" didn't convict him, a criminal court did. That's even more encouraging
    than any monetary award because the driver's company's insurer will pay the
    award. He has to do the time though.

    Regards,
    Bob Hunt

  11. Quoted message said:

    Indeed. Too bad $5,000,000 can't return a life, though. I'm sure the
    Steinwedel family would rather have him than the money.

    Instead of bankrupting the driver, they go after the deep pockets of the
    company.
    The American way.

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Hunrobe) said:
    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    The amount of work they had to do
    to convict this A-hole, would be well
    worth the money.

    "They" didn't convict him, a criminal court did. That's even more encouraging
    than any monetary award because the driver's company's insurer will pay the
    award. He has to do the time though.

    Regards,
    Bob Hunt

    It typicaly takes about 7 years for these cases to be settled. ( Appeal after
    appeal ).

    The insurance company may have to post the award with the court, but they don¹t
    have to pay it to the plaintif until all appeals are settled.

    Lawyers usually take 33 t0 50 percent in these type of cases.

    HAND

    --
    ³Freedom Is a Light for Which Many Have Died in Darkness³

    - Tomb of the unknown - American Revolution

  13. Quoted message said:

    It typicaly takes about 7 years for these cases to be settled. ( Appeal after

    appeal ).

    The insurance company may have to post the award with the court, but they
    don¹t
    have to pay it to the plaintif until all appeals are settled.

    If there was a $5,000,000 settlement, that is it. A settlement is when the
    parties make their own private deal "settling" a civil suit. So the money is
    paid and it is all over. There are no appeals in a settlement.

  14. (Fx199) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Indeed. Too bad $5,000,000 can't return a life, though. I'm sure the
    Steinwedel family would rather have him than the money.

    Instead of bankrupting the driver, they go after the deep pockets of the
    company.
    The American way.

    The logical way, since the driver in the performance of his duties was
    acting as an agent for Yuba Trucking.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3

  15. John Everett said:
    (Fx199) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Indeed. Too bad $5,000,000 can't return a life, though. I'm sure the
    Steinwedel family would rather have him than the money.

    Instead of bankrupting the driver, they go after the deep pockets of the
    company.
    The American way.

    The logical way, since the driver in the performance of his duties was
    acting as an agent for Yuba Trucking.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net http://home.earthlink.net/~jeverett3

    So, the other poster wants them to go after the truck driver? Talk about
    ruining a life! How could a truck driver pay $5mill?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

  16. Quoted message said:

    "H. M. Leary" [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    It typicaly takes about 7 years for these cases to be settled. ( Appeal after

    appeal ).

    The insurance company may have to post the award with the court, but they
    don¹t
    have to pay it to the plaintif until all appeals are settled.

    Lawyers usually take 33 t0 50 percent in these type of cases.

    True but this was apparently a settlement not an award so no appeal will
    follow. The 33 to 50% figures are fair enough *if* the attorneys bore the cost
    of the research and litigation. Most attorneys I know are honest and their
    charges fair. I've known one or two though that weren't above taking half of a
    settlement as a fee and then trying to grab the bulk of the other half through
    itemized charges for expert testimony and the like when they had purposely
    allowed their clients to think that those expenses would come out of the law
    firm's pocket. Thankfully, that type of attorney is the exception not the rule.

    Regards,
    Bob Hunt

  17. Bob in CT said:

    So, the other poster wants them to go after the truck driver? Talk about
    ruining a life! How could a truck driver pay $5mill?

    The difficult thing would be for him to do so from jail. He was convicted
    of vehicular manslaughter.

    Austin
    --
    I'm pedaling as fast as I durn well please!
    There are no X characters in my address

  18. Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Fx199

    Quoted message said:

    Instead of bankrupting the driver, they go after the deep pockets of the
    company.
    The American way.

    And the British way....
    and the Canadian....
    and the Australian...
    and Indian...
    and every other country whose laws have roots in English common law.

    I've never understood why so many contemptuously term holding a company
    responsible for it's employees actions "The American Way". The concept is a
    good one and it is not limited to or even invented by Americans. Suppose some
    part of your job performance caused one of your company's customers to lose
    money. What remedy would you suggest? This is getting far afield for a cycling
    NG though so I'll drop the issue.

    Regards,
    Bob Hunt


  19. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Instead of bankrupting the driver, they go after the deep pockets of


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    company.
    The American way.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The logical way, since the driver in the performance of his duties was
    acting as an agent for Yuba Trucking.
    jeverett3

    Quoted message said:


    So, the other poster wants them to go after the truck driver? Talk about
    ruining a life! How could a truck driver pay $5mill?

    Quoted message said:

    Bob in CT

    Nah, the other poster wants to slam Americans. It has nothing to do with
    anything but the opportunity of a cheap shot against Americans.

    Pat in TX

  20. 26 Aug 2004 07:25:05 GMT,
    <[email hidden]>,

    (Hunrobe) said:

    "They" didn't convict him, a criminal court did. That's even more encouraging
    than any monetary award because the driver's company's insurer will pay the
    award.

    What's discouraging is that it sounds like the lawyers had to get a
    court order so that a proper forensic investigation would be done.

    Quoted message said:

    He has to do the time though.

    The other guy's dead forever. This guy should never again be permitted
    to drive.
    --
    zk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.