I'm starting my second year commuting (year-round) on a 2002 Volpe and am loving it. As with most cyclocross bikes, it's got plenty of frame and brake clearance for fatter tires, and it has attachment points for full fenders and a rear rack (although it has only one braze-on at the derailleur hanger...no biggie). I happen to run 28 mm tires (Panaracer Pasela TGs), but I'd bet it could accommodate any fatter tire you'd want for commuting over pavement, and even one that could handle gravel and mud, if that's what your route is like! (BTW, I have to recommend full fenders over the partial ones the Portland appears to come with...you'll keep yourself, your bike, and folks riding behind you from getting muddy.)
The frame and fork for 2002 are both steel, so don't expect it to be feather light, but it was lighter than I expected, and it feels nimble starting, stopping, and climbing when I ride it unloaded.
Besides plenty of clearance, the Avid Shorty 6 cantilever brakes have decent stopping power, even when wet (at least w/ the Kool Stop salmon pads I'm using), although I do have some squeal problems I'm still working on. Now, the Trek you're looking at has disc brakes, which are supposed to be the best type for rainy conditions. I'll just say that these cantis have been quite sufficient for me in rainy Seattle except on the really steep grades, where I would go slow regardless of brake type.
Front fork doesn't have a mid-fork attachment point for a front rack, if you ever get the point of consider that, but I understand you can just mount those with hose clamps.
I've had no trouble with the wheels so far. 36 spokes should hold up fine under you and whatever you can load onto the bike.
The chainstays on the 2002 model are long enough that I've never had heel strike issues, but your mileage will vary with your choice of rack, pannier, and, of course, your foot and pedal position. I believe later models shortened the chainstay a bit, but I don't think by much, and don't take my word for it.
The stock gearing (28/38/48, 11-32) was a little wide for my particular riding (and load) habits, so I got a road cassette that works great for me (12-26). I still get a pretty wide range, given it's a triple, and it's hilly in Seattle, too.
I lucked out and found my bike used for $400, so if you can bear being patient and are bike-savvy enough to inspect a prospective purchase (or have a friend who could appraise for you), keep your eyes peeled. Though this post is about my experience w/ the Volpe, I'm hoping I covered lots of the basic things you'll want to pay attention to when shopping for a commuter. Good luck, and have fun!
FYI I considered a few other similar bikes when I was shopping around: Jamis Aurora (also steel, great value), Fuji Touring (also steel and Deore/Tiagra mix, last time I checked), Trek 520 (steel; pricier, and I shied away from bar-end shifters...new 520s have 105 STI), Cannondale T800 (pricier, aluminum frame)
Ooo, one last thing: The Volpe has near-horizontal dropouts, in case you ever consider going single-speed or fixie!
amacks said:I'm thinking about replacing my crappy MTB(heavy, too small and gear ratios are off) with a better bike for my commute(working up to 15mi, roads but hilly and parts are bumpy). I've got about 10lbs of stuff, so I want the ability to mount a rack, and I'd like fenders.
The Bianchi Volpe looks promising, any other similar bikes I should consider? I like the look of the Trek Portland, but its pricey and not really out yet
Aaron