I love the way the UK considers it pays high tax- still not done the thinking required to actually bridge the gap into wanting to create a better society for all.
Of course Mr Marx proposed another way but that didn't work too well either.
Both systems had the same fundamental flaw - us.[1]
[1] Well, maybe not /us/ as all cyclists are decent, honest and upsitting[2] people :-)
"Mark Thompson" <[email hidden] (change warm for hot)> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
the rich will get richer but surely more concerning is that the poor
will get
Quoted message said:
poorer.
I've never really bothered how rich the rich are - better things to get
envious
Quoted message said:
about IMHO. The poor are getting richer though, unless you're talking
about
Quoted message said:
this slightly misleading 'relative' thing.
Ah.. you're probably right, they can all go to University now and earn a fortune when they come out so there won't be any poor people in the future (!) Of course in a service economy (the UK) this might present a few challenges to say the least!
"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Willowbeauty said:
I love the way the UK considers it pays high tax- still not done the thinking required to actually bridge the gap into wanting to create a
better
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
society for all.
Of course Mr Marx proposed another way but that didn't work too well
either.
Quoted message said:
Tony
I notice that Cuba's healthcare system seems to working fairly effectively. I also notice that most of Scandinavia actually ensure their population are putting money aside for the old-age. The UK has so much to learn, but will it?
"Mark Thompson" <[email hidden] (change warm for hot)> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Fair enough. I don't like the 'privatise everything, pay really low tax
and
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
wonder why everything falls apart' method.
Quoted message said:
Excellent. I don't like the 'nationalise everything, pay really high tax
and
Quoted message said:
still wonder why everything falls apart method'. Maybe we can find a
third way
Quoted message said:
somehow. D'oh.
You must have been really [censored] of with Major, then, and his "we've privatised everything and pretended the income is revenue but now we've run out of things to sell and we'll have to put taxes back up to cover the costs of Maggie's holy war against manufacturing industry" method ;-)
I notice that Cuba's healthcare system seems to working fairly effectively. I also notice that most of Scandinavia actually ensure their population are putting money aside for the old-age. The UK has so much to learn, but will it?
Since Cuba achieves that on a per capita annual health spend one tenth that of the UK perhaps we should be looking at NHS costs rather than more taxes then ;-)
But I agree on the pensions side. Gordon's raid on the pension funds to fund his programmes didn't do a lot to encourage or assist people saving for their old age.
"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I notice that Cuba's healthcare system seems to working fairly
effectively.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I also notice that most of Scandinavia actually ensure their population
are
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
putting money aside for the old-age. The UK has so much to learn, but
will
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
it?
Quoted message said:
Since Cuba achieves that on a per capita annual health spend one tenth
that of
Quoted message said:
the UK perhaps we should be looking at NHS costs rather than more taxes
then
Quoted message said:
;-)
It must be profoundly embarrasing for the Septics, whose healthcare system is the most expensive per capita in the world and you can still die while waiting for your HMO to approve treatment. If you have a HMO (which, if you are chronically ill, you won't).
Quoted message said:
But I agree on the pensions side. Gordon's raid on the pension funds to
fund
Quoted message said:
his programmes didn't do a lot to encourage or assist people saving for
their
Quoted message said:
old age.
Clearly learned at the knee of the late unlamented Cap'n Bob.
But I agree on the pensions side. Gordon's raid on the pension funds to fund his programmes didn't do a lot to encourage or assist people saving for their old age.
That just brought forward an inevitable pensions crash.
Without it, the crash would have been put off, and would have been many times bigger when it came. I've been certain since the 1980s that my generation won't enjoy the same level of provision as todays pensioners - precisely because we have an unsustainable system based largely on a pyramid investment.
Right now, the next problem is probably property-price inflation. We got that when Gordon paid off the national debt and pushed interest rates right down. Now he's running up a big debt again ...
"W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty"
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems and Labour.
Quoted message said:
Fair enough.
Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do.
Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.
I'll let you know when you are in charge of my opinion forming, til then, perhaps you'd butt out? I stated fair enough as I am quite happy to accept and listen to other peoples views- I am sure you are equally tolerant, you just don't show it particularly well.
"Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"]news:[email hidden]... > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty"
Quoted message said:
> I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems and Labour.
Quoted message said:
Fair enough.
Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do.
Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.
I'll let you know when you are in charge of my opinion forming, til then, perhaps you'd butt out?
WTF? Feel free to talk [censored], my point was that much as people attribute the above to L+L thats a cunning piece of [censored].
Quoted message said:
I stated fair enough as I am quite happy to accept and listen to other peoples views- I am sure you are equally tolerant, you just don't show it particularly well.
"Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote
in
Quoted message said:
message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]... > > > "James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message
Quoted message said:
> > "]news:[email hidden]... > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty" > > > > I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems
and
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> > > Labour. > > > Fair enough. > > Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do. > > Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.
I'll let you know when you are in charge of my opinion forming, til
then,
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
perhaps you'd butt out?
WTF? Feel free to talk [censored], my point was that much as people attribute
the
Quoted message said:
above to L+L thats a cunning piece of [censored].
Your justification? Any idiot can throw stones
I gave my justification early on. I would like you to think about it. There has been a gradual increase in health+safety interference over the last 50 years. (quite rightly so sometimes (exhibit A : Fred Dibnah's garden)). There will have been a lot of such legislation brought in by tories, and obviously the whole thing rolls on today under labour.
To make out that it is something entirely Lib+Lab is at the least exaggeration, at the most plain, risible [censored]. Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" were things that the Tories introduced Nanny- state legislation for. Not to mention the general judgmental tone of "back to basic" - they are as good as anyone at poking the government's nose into other people's business. As much as the Tories do go on about "small government" etc. this seems mainly to apply to their friends in small businesses.
So, there are my stones. The tories are nowhere near as liberterian as they like to portray themselves. Liberals and Labour are not as controlling as those fun press stories would like us to believe.
"W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote
in
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Your justification? Any idiot can throw stones
I gave my justification early on. I would like you to think about it. There has been a gradual increase in health+safety interference over the last 50 years. (quite rightly so sometimes (exhibit A : Fred Dibnah's garden)). There
will
Quoted message said:
have been a lot of such legislation brought in by tories, and obviously
the
Quoted message said:
whole thing rolls on today under labour.
To make out that it is something entirely Lib+Lab is at the least exaggeration, at the most plain, risible [censored]. Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" were things that the Tories introduced Nanny- state legislation for. Not to mention the general judgmental tone of "back to basic" - they are
as
Quoted message said:
good as anyone at poking the government's nose into other people's
business.
Quoted message said:
As much as the Tories do go on about "small government" etc. this seems mainly to apply to their friends in small businesses.
So, there are my stones. The tories are nowhere near as liberterian as they like to portray themselves. Liberals and Labour are not as controlling as those fun press stories
would
Quoted message said:
like us to believe.
Yes all seems logical and fair enough- lucky we get the government we deserve isn't it!