UK and Europe · Public discussion

BHIT MPs

Started by Tony Raven · · Last activity · 36 posts · 2,084 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
26 January 2004
Last activity
3 February 2004
Original author
Tony Raven
Posts
36
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,084
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–36 of 36
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I love the way the UK considers it pays high tax- still not done the thinking required to
    actually bridge the gap into wanting to create a better society for all.

    Of course Mr Marx proposed another way but that didn't work too well either.

    Both systems had the same fundamental flaw - us.[1]

    [1] Well, maybe not /us/ as all cyclists are decent, honest and upsitting[2] people :-)

    [2] Apart from recumbent riders.

  2. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Willowbeauty said:


    I love the way the UK considers it pays high tax- still not done the thinking required to
    actually bridge the gap into wanting to create a


    better

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    society for all.

    Of course Mr Marx proposed another way but that didn't work too well


    either.

    Honk?

    cheers, clive

  3. "Mark Thompson" <[email hidden] (change warm for hot)>
    wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the rich will get richer but surely more concerning is that the poor


    will get

    Quoted message said:

    poorer.

    I've never really bothered how rich the rich are - better things to get


    envious

    Quoted message said:

    about IMHO. The poor are getting richer though, unless you're talking


    about

    Quoted message said:

    this slightly misleading 'relative' thing.

    Ah.. you're probably right, they can all go to University now and earn a fortune when they come out
    so there won't be any poor people in the future (!) Of course in a service economy (the UK) this
    might present a few challenges to say the least!

  4. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Willowbeauty said:


    I love the way the UK considers it pays high tax- still not done the thinking required to
    actually bridge the gap into wanting to create a


    better

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    society for all.

    Of course Mr Marx proposed another way but that didn't work too well


    either.

    Quoted message said:


    Tony

    I notice that Cuba's healthcare system seems to working fairly effectively. I also notice that most
    of Scandinavia actually ensure their population are putting money aside for the old-age. The UK has
    so much to learn, but will it?

  5. "Mark Thompson" <[email hidden] (change warm for hot)>
    wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fair enough. I don't like the 'privatise everything, pay really low tax


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    wonder why everything falls apart' method.

    Quoted message said:

    Excellent. I don't like the 'nationalise everything, pay really high tax


    and

    Quoted message said:

    still wonder why everything falls apart method'. Maybe we can find a


    third way

    Quoted message said:

    somehow. D'oh.

    You must have been really [censored] of with Major, then, and his "we've privatised everything and
    pretended the income is revenue but now we've run out of things to sell and we'll have to put taxes
    back up to cover the costs of Maggie's holy war against manufacturing industry" method ;-)

    --
    Guy
    ===

    WARNING: may contain traces of irony. Contents may settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

  6. Willowbeauty said:


    I notice that Cuba's healthcare system seems to working fairly effectively. I also notice that
    most of Scandinavia actually ensure their population are putting money aside for the old-age. The
    UK has so much to learn, but will it?

    Since Cuba achieves that on a per capita annual health spend one tenth that of the UK perhaps we
    should be looking at NHS costs rather than more taxes then ;-)

    But I agree on the pensions side. Gordon's raid on the pension funds to fund his programmes didn't
    do a lot to encourage or assist people saving for their old age.

    Tony

  7. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I notice that Cuba's healthcare system seems to working fairly


    effectively.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I also notice that most of Scandinavia actually ensure their population


    are

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    putting money aside for the old-age. The UK has so much to learn, but


    will

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it?

    Quoted message said:

    Since Cuba achieves that on a per capita annual health spend one tenth


    that of

    Quoted message said:

    the UK perhaps we should be looking at NHS costs rather than more taxes


    then

    Quoted message said:

    ;-)

    It must be profoundly embarrasing for the Septics, whose healthcare system is the most expensive per
    capita in the world and you can still die while waiting for your HMO to approve treatment. If you
    have a HMO (which, if you are chronically ill, you won't).

    Quoted message said:

    But I agree on the pensions side. Gordon's raid on the pension funds to


    fund

    Quoted message said:

    his programmes didn't do a lot to encourage or assist people saving for


    their

    Quoted message said:

    old age.

    Clearly learned at the knee of the late unlamented Cap'n Bob.

    --
    Guy
    ===

    WARNING: may contain traces of irony. Contents may settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Tony Raven said:

    But I agree on the pensions side. Gordon's raid on the pension funds to fund his programmes didn't
    do a lot to encourage or assist people saving for their old age.

    That just brought forward an inevitable pensions crash.

    Without it, the crash would have been put off, and would have been many times bigger when it came.
    I've been certain since the 1980s that my generation won't enjoy the same level of provision as
    todays pensioners - precisely because we have an unsustainable system based largely on a pyramid
    investment.

    Right now, the next problem is probably property-price inflation. We got that when Gordon paid off
    the national debt and pushed interest rates right down. Now he's running up a big debt again ...

    --
    Nick Kew

  9. Colin Blackburn said:

    If you don't know who your MP is then go to upmystreet.comupmystreet.com

    Another good site is publicwhip.org.ukpublicwhip.org.uk -- type in your postcode and find out your MP's
    voting record.

    --
    Gareth Rees

  10. "Gareth Rees" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Another good site is publicwhip.org.ukpublicwhip.org.uk -- type in your postcode and find out your MP's
    voting record.

    See, you spoiled it by telling us what it does. Much better to let us speculate on the precise
    nature of the public whipping on offer...

    --
    Guy
    ===

    WARNING: may contain traces of irony. Contents may settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

  11. Quoted message said:

    "James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems and Labour.

    Quoted message said:

    Fair enough.

    Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do.

    Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.

  12. "W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    "James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty"

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems and Labour.

    Quoted message said:

    Fair enough.

    Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do.

    Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.

    I'll let you know when you are in charge of my opinion forming, til then, perhaps you'd butt out? I
    stated fair enough as I am quite happy to accept and listen to other peoples views- I am sure you
    are equally tolerant, you just don't show it particularly well.

  13. "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    "James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "]news:[email hidden]...
    > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty"

    Quoted message said:

    > I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems and Labour.

    Quoted message said:

    Fair enough.

    Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do.

    Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.

    I'll let you know when you are in charge of my opinion forming, til then, perhaps you'd butt out?

    WTF? Feel free to talk [censored], my point was that much as people attribute the above to L+L thats a
    cunning piece of [censored].

    Quoted message said:

    I stated fair enough as I am quite happy to accept and listen to other peoples views- I am sure
    you are equally tolerant, you just don't show it particularly well.

    I'm not tolerant of views founded on [censored].

  14. "W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote


    in

    Quoted message said:

    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    > "James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > "]news:[email hidden]...
    > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty"

    > > I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > Labour.

    > Fair enough.

    Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do.

    Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.

    I'll let you know when you are in charge of my opinion forming, til


    then,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    perhaps you'd butt out?

    WTF? Feel free to talk [censored], my point was that much as people attribute


    the

    Quoted message said:

    above to L+L thats a cunning piece of [censored].

    Your justification? Any idiot can throw stones

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I stated fair enough as I am quite happy to accept and listen to other peoples views- I am sure
    you are equally tolerant,


    you

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    just don't show it particularly well.

    I'm not tolerant of views founded on [censored].

    I over-estimated you then- I think you've made yourself clear, go pick an argument with someone 'on
    your level'

  15. "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote


    in

    Quoted message said:

    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > > "James Hodson" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:

    > > "]news:[email hidden]...
    > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:49:47 -0000, "Willowbeauty"
    >
    > > > I don't like the "the state knows best" attitude of the LibDems


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > > Labour.
    >
    > > Fair enough.
    >
    > Not really. The tories were never too slow in telling people what to do.
    >
    > Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" come to mind.

    I'll let you know when you are in charge of my opinion forming, til


    then,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    perhaps you'd butt out?

    WTF? Feel free to talk [censored], my point was that much as people attribute


    the

    Quoted message said:

    above to L+L thats a cunning piece of [censored].

    Your justification? Any idiot can throw stones

    I gave my justification early on. I would like you to think about it. There has been a gradual
    increase in health+safety interference over the last 50 years. (quite rightly so sometimes (exhibit
    A : Fred Dibnah's garden)). There will have been a lot of such legislation brought in by tories, and
    obviously the whole thing rolls on today under labour.

    To make out that it is something entirely Lib+Lab is at the least exaggeration, at the most plain,
    risible [censored]. Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" were things that the Tories introduced Nanny-
    state legislation for. Not to mention the general judgmental tone of "back to basic" - they are as
    good as anyone at poking the government's nose into other people's business. As much as the Tories
    do go on about "small government" etc. this seems mainly to apply to their friends in small
    businesses.

    So, there are my stones. The tories are nowhere near as liberterian as they like to portray
    themselves. Liberals and Labour are not as controlling as those fun press stories would like us
    to believe.

  16. "W K" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Willowbeauty" <[email hidden]> wrote


    in

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Your justification? Any idiot can throw stones

    I gave my justification early on. I would like you to think about it. There has been a gradual
    increase in health+safety interference over the last 50 years. (quite rightly so sometimes
    (exhibit A : Fred Dibnah's garden)). There


    will

    Quoted message said:

    have been a lot of such legislation brought in by tories, and obviously


    the

    Quoted message said:

    whole thing rolls on today under labour.

    To make out that it is something entirely Lib+Lab is at the least exaggeration, at the most plain,
    risible [censored]. Dangerous dogs and "rythmic music" were things that the Tories introduced Nanny-
    state legislation for. Not to mention the general judgmental tone of "back to basic" - they are


    as

    Quoted message said:

    good as anyone at poking the government's nose into other people's


    business.

    Quoted message said:

    As much as the Tories do go on about "small government" etc. this seems mainly to apply to their
    friends in small businesses.

    So, there are my stones. The tories are nowhere near as liberterian as they like to portray
    themselves. Liberals and Labour are not as controlling as those fun press stories


    would

    Quoted message said:

    like us to believe.

    Yes all seems logical and fair enough- lucky we get the government we deserve isn't it!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.