Why else would he not have signed the uci's anti-doping charter?
Maybe he's classicomano Luigi?
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Professional Cycling · Public discussion
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Why else would he not have signed the uci's anti-doping charter?
Maybe he's classicomano Luigi?
Interesting.
From my perspective, a rider would only dope if they thought they wouldn't get caught. Therefore, I thought that most riders would take their chances and sign this thing. The possible exception would be the riders that know they have already been caught because they stored blood with Fuentes.
Who else is missing?
Moller said:Why else would he not have signed the uci's anti-doping charter?
Maybe he's classicomano Luigi?
Two things:
1. Signing it doesn't mean you're clean, as evidenced by everyone in the TDF who was caught after signing it
2. The thing gives pretty much zero rights to the rider to protect themself and their career from mistakes in testing, etc.
Moller said:Why else would he not have signed the uci's anti-doping charter?
Maybe he's classicomano Luigi?
Bettini said he would quit cycling before he would provide a sample to be used for DNA comparisons. That should pretty much tell you what you need to know.
No big surprise I guess. Still love the guy.
Yup. I think he should have signed.
- at least somebody's got some backbone.
.
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.