The age-old debate about strength training for cyclists continues, with many advocating for its benefits while others claim its a waste of time that takes away from actual cycling. As we all know, the goal for most competitive cyclists is to increase speed, and many of us have turned to strength training as a way to achieve this. However, the types of exercises and the intensity at which we perform them is often a topic of contention.
Some argue that high-intensity strength training is the way to go, citing the importance of explosive power in sprinting and climbing. They claim that exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and bench press are essential for building the type of power and strength needed to propel a bike forward. Others, however, argue that high-intensity strength training can lead to bulk and decreased flexibility, ultimately hindering a cyclists performance.
On the other hand, some cyclists swear by low-intensity strength training, citing the importance of endurance and muscular endurance in long-distance events. They claim that exercises such as bodyweight squats, lunges, and leg press are more effective in building the type of strength and endurance needed for events such as gran fondos and century rides.
But what about the role of functional strength training in cycling? Exercises such as step-ups, balance boards, and single-leg squats are often touted as being more specific to cycling and can help improve balance, coordination, and overall bike handling skills.
So, Id like to ask, what are the most effective strength training exercises for cyclists looking to improve speed? Should we be focusing on high-intensity strength training, low-intensity strength training, or functional strength training? Or is it a combination of all three? What are the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, and how can we incorporate them into our training programs?