Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Bents for 300 + guys

Started by George Tadeusia · · Last activity · 14 posts · 1,078 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
15 July 2003
Last activity
18 July 2003
Original author
George Tadeusia
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,078
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My brother is looking to get a recumbent to loose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has a
    limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

  2. (George Tadeusiak) said:

    My brother is looking to get a recumbent to lose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has a
    limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    I had a Linear LWB when I was 260lbs and it held up OK... but the long wheelbase can be a pain in
    the city. Discontinued, around $700-800 typically.

    I'm now looking at the better BikeE models (FX,/XL RX/XL) with suspension. If he goes with a BikeE,
    make sure it's an 'XL' sized model.
    --
    Nobody but a fool goes into a federal counterrorism operation without duct tape - Richard Preston,
    THE COBRA EVENT.

  3. go with a Rans V2 with Aerospoke Wheels Thank you Earl GRR,RANS V2 Ti Rush,Ti Pursuit

  4. Based on personal experience, I would suggest your brother lose at least fifty or sixty pounds and
    then purchase a recumbent both as a self-reward and a great way to achieve fun and fitness.

    Quoted message said:

    My brother is looking to get a recumbent to loose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has a
    limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

  5. As a pretty big rider, but not as big your bro, I would suggest in a SWB a Bacchetta Giro, Rans
    Vrex, in used they are around that price. They both have a pretty good frame design come in XL size
    and would probably handle the weight. The rear wheel may not hold up, but a well built and
    maintained wheel probably will. I have toured with a 99 BikeE Ct loaded with rider at nearly 300
    pounds. I wouldn't look for a suspension in any bike as most if not all of the suspensions max out
    at 275 pounds. In the LWB the EZ sport maybe rugged enough and the price in the range. I don't think
    most frames are that much of an issue, the rear wheel however, may have to be upgraded to a 40 or 48
    spoke tandem wheel if they start to break spokes. Good luck on the quest Hopefully it will be the
    best under 1200 bucks your brother has ever spent. Denny in Sayre, Pa "Bent but not Broken
    www.recumbentstuff.com

    "Vol" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Based on personal experience, I would suggest your brother lose at least fifty or sixty pounds and
    then purchase a recumbent both as a self-reward and a great way to achieve fun and fitness.

    Quoted message said:

    My brother is looking to get a recumbent to loose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has
    a limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

  6. I think that you can use the biking activity to loose the weight. A reasonable rate of aerobic
    excerise constistently will help him lose pounds. But on recumbents, I would recommend that when he
    starts he should just pick very flat routes to get his body burning the fat and losing some weight
    and building his leg strength. Going uphill will be very difficult. I am 5'7" and 180 lbs. I can
    climb reasonably okay on my bent, but I can imaging would it would be like pulling another 120 lbs
    behind me.

    Down hills do not give you any excercise. Gravity helps you a lot.

    "Vol" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Based on personal experience, I would suggest your brother lose at least fifty or sixty pounds and
    then purchase a recumbent both as a self-reward and a great way to achieve fun and fitness.

    Quoted message said:

    My brother is looking to get a recumbent to loose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has
    a limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

  7. [email hidden] (DrRecumbnt) wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I'd suggest a LWB low BB like a Sun EZ Sport (steel version), lose weight, save bucks for a 2nd
    bike down the road.

    I wouldn't recommend a BikeE suspension. The suspension pogos with big riders. No XL, or XXL frame
    size or air in the shock can solve this.

    Some mfrs will custom build that is actually suitable for a #300+ rider. My first stop would be
    Lightfoot and the Ranger.

    Bob Bryant recumbentcyclistnews.comrecumbentcyclistnews.com

    At 300lbs you will flex most frames enough to get a very cushy ride. No suspension needed. I was
    close enough when I got my first bent, a BikeE CT, handled me with no problems. THen a Rans V²,
    again no problems.

  8. [email hidden] (George Tadeusiak) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    My brother is looking to get a recumbent to loose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has
    a limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

    Hi, I'm a 300+ pounder myself. A used EasyRacer tourEasy should be a fine bike. And,perhaps a
    Lightning T-Bolt also. Lightning does make a seat frame to hold us full sized men. All the lighter
    folk are fullsized too.. just built to a smaller scale. Paul Milner

  9. I'm 6ft and was 245lb. I ride a Vision R-54. I replaced the factory tires 20x1.35 and 26x1 with wider, but still high pressure tires 20x1.95 (Maxxis Hookworm) on the front and 26x1.5 (Specilized Nimbus) on the rear and enjoyed the ride much more (better handling and far fewer flats). I would avoid "racing" type recumbents with narrow wheels and tires.

    To stay within his budget, buying used will allow him to buy a better bike for roughly 1/2 to 3/4 of the new price. Many people buy bikes, ride them for a bit and then let them collect dust, so a little searching of the internet (ebay as well) should yield some deals.

    However I would caution that he posses basic bike mechanical ability for buying used. Changing tires, cleaning the chain, adjusting and replacing brake and derailer cables and replacing brake pad and all skills he should posses. If that's too intimidating, buying from a full service local bike shop is probably the best bet.

  10. I appreciate all of your replies. I have forwarded them to my brother who has been looking at long
    wheel-based bikes. He has had a chance to test drive some at Prestige Cycles and seems to be getting
    excited about riding. He thanks you all for your help.

  11. "George Tadeusiak" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I appreciate all of your replies. I have forwarded them to my brother who has been looking at long
    wheel-based bikes. He has had a chance to test drive some at Prestige Cycles and seems to be
    getting excited about riding. He thanks you all for your help.

    Would that be Prestige Cycles in Clinton Twp, MI? If so, Andy will take care of him. BTW, Easy
    Racers LWBs like the EZ Sport or Tour Easy might work.

  12. My wife and I are both large bent riders. We started the 1st of this year. We had a pair of custom
    built RANS V2 with upgraded components and Aerospoke wheels. We got a wonderful deal ($1500.00 each)
    from Mark Powers at Power On Cycling. 813-737-3001 or poweroncycling.com. Just as a note of
    encouragement I have lost over 20 Lbs. and now have about 650 miles on my bike.

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    My brother is looking to get a recumbent to loose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has
    a limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

  13. Cast my vote for the Vision R-40 SWB (either OSS us USS). Brand new bike for $1200. The 2" chromoly
    frame is fairly stout, yet gives enough flex that suspension is not necessary on relatively smooth
    roads. Vision officially recommends a 275 pound weight limit for this bike, but I'm pretty sure it
    could handle 310 without any problem. With the seat skewer in the rear position, there should be
    plenty of boom adjustment for your brother's long legs. I'm recommending a SWB bike because IMHO the
    basic design is stout and lightweight. I certainly would NOT recommend the LWB or MWB version of the
    R-40 because I believe that's too long a run for a heavy person on a monotube frame. Also, the SWB
    design yeilds a nearly 50/50 weight distribution, depending ultimately on the seat angle. I used a
    bathroom scale to determine this. With me on it, with the seat in the rear position, I measured 55%
    rear and 45% front. A CLWB bike like a Bike-E tends to put most of the weight on the rear wheel. One
    of the unique features of a Vision is their no-dish rear wheel. Instead of dishing the spokes to
    acommodate the cassette, they build the frame itself slightly off-center so that the wheels run true
    without dishing the wheel. This yields a very strong wheel. I was 255 pounds when I got this bike
    (I'm 215 now). I've got over 4000 miles on the bike and have only trued the wheels once (and that
    was a very minor adjustment that I was able to take care of myself). Never have broken a spoke.

    Now having said all this, you're still talking about a rider who is 35 pounds heavier than the
    recommended maximum weight (including water, tools and luggage) recommended by the manufacturer. But
    in the real world, it's not the static stresses that break things, but the dymanic stresses, like
    potholes, curbs, stairs, jumping, etc. No matter what your weight, the more whacks your bike takes
    the more likely it will be to develop stress cracks in the frame and wheels or to break spokes. I
    guess what I'm trying to say is that a 310 pound person who's kind to his bike (riding smooth roads
    and bikepaths, avoiding potholes, not riding down stairs and curbs, not jumping things [yeah
    right!]) will get more damage-free miles than a 250-pounder who abuses his bike. This is why those
    crazy downhill mountain bikers break so many parts (and bones).

    On the subject of weight loss, I have never found cycling to be effective at weight control by
    itself. I have always needed to combine exercise with diet in order to be successful. Has your
    brother tried Atkins?

    Bill Anton 2001 Vision R-40 SWB OSS Lubbock, TX, USA

    [email hidden] (George Tadeusiak) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    My brother is looking to get a recumbent to loose some weight. He is 6' 5" and 310 pounds, he has
    a limited budget $1200.00 and below. Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

  14. "Bill Anton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Cast my vote for the Vision R-40 SWB (either OSS us USS). Brand new bike for $1200. The 2"
    chromoly frame is fairly stout, yet gives enough flex that suspension is not necessary on
    relatively smooth roads. Vision officially recommends a 275 pound weight limit for this bike, but
    I'm pretty sure it could handle 310 without any problem.

    Agreed except I was 260 and had an R-50 but I'd bet it could take 300. I now am at 210 with about 40
    to go and ride an Optima Baron

    Quoted message said:

    On the subject of weight loss, I have never found cycling to be effective at weight control by
    itself. I have always needed to combine exercise with diet in order to be successful. Has your
    brother tried Atkins?

    I found cycling alone to be VERY good at weight loss, never tried to diet.
    🙂

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.