UK and Europe · Public discussion

Bendy buses

Started by Coyoteboy · · Last activity · 27 posts · 943 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
20 November 2007
Last activity
22 November 2007
Original author
Coyoteboy
Posts
27
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
943
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–27 of 27
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. dkahn400 said:
    Steve said:
    Coyoteboy said:

    Tom Crispin wrote:
    > [10 quoted lines suppressed]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Dya know what, i cant work that out either. Very odd.

    Quoted message said:

    From previous discussions the only logical conclusion was that the other
    lorry was forced across from an adjoining tunnel.

    Yes, it appears to shoot through the wall and into the side of the
    first lorry. There's a hole in the wall that wasn't there before.
    Quite hard to avoid a lorry that T bones you through a wall, I'd say.

    If you run the video backwards, it gives the impression that the 2nd
    lorry comes through the wall just out of shot, ie before the gap you
    can see. The new hole is created by the collision. The lorry doesn't
    come through the gap you can see at first as the barrier still appears
    to be present at the end of the shot.

    TL

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, Steve
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Coyoteboy said:
    Tom Crispin said:

    [10 quoted lines suppressed]

    Dya know what, i cant work that out either. Very odd.

    From previous discussions the only logical conclusion was that the other
    lorry was forced across from an adjoining tunnel.


    That's an extremely suspect conclusion - where was the other discussion?

  3. Rob Morley said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Steve

    says... On Tue said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tom Crispin wrote:
    > [10 quoted lines suppressed]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Dya know what, i cant work that out either. Very odd.

    Quoted message said:

    From previous discussions the only logical conclusion was that the other
    lorry was forced across from an adjoining tunnel.

    That's an extremely suspect conclusion - where was the other discussion?

    If you look again you will see that after the crash there is a lorry
    sized hole in the wall that was not there before. It therefore makes
    sense to suppose that that's where the new lorry came from. This would
    also explain why the first lorry veered so suddenly and sharply to the
    left - it was hit by the second one as it emerged from the hole.

    --
    Dave...

  4. On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:55:12 -0000, Rob Morley <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Steve
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Coyoteboy said:

    Tom Crispin wrote:
    > [10 quoted lines suppressed]

    Dya know what, i cant work that out either. Very odd.

    From previous discussions the only logical conclusion was that the other
    lorry was forced across from an adjoining tunnel.


    That's an extremely suspect conclusion - where was the other discussion?

    What is you explaination? How does the second truck suddenly
    materialise in the tunnel?

  5. Tony Raven said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    The driver did amazingly well to hold everything together and (s)he fared
    better than some the haplees motorists on the ice covered road.

    I suspect it was more of a lottery than that with the prizes of if you
    get away with it you get the Exceptional Skill & Bravery Medal and if
    you don't you win the Robert Harris "Black Ice" Consolation Medal for
    being the unfortunate victim of circumstances.

    I am left wondering how many days its cold enough to be icy in Moscow,

    Well, in the winter of 1993 / 94, the first snow arrived (to general
    greetings of 's pyervym snyegom' [1]) in late October. It was icy from
    then until March, with patches of ice in parts as late as May.

    Quoted message said:

    how long the tunnel had been leaking and how often the drivers had
    driven through there. Did they not know it was proned to icing before
    they found out the hard way?

    Early 1990s Muscovite drivers all seemed completely mad to me. I've no
    idea whether they've got any better in the intervening years.

    Cheers,
    Luke

    [1] Happy first snow!

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

  6. In article <[email hidden]>, Tom Crispin
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    What is you explaination? How does the second truck suddenly
    materialise in the tunnel?


    I already posted it in this thread.

  7. On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:35:28 -0000, Rob Morley <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, Tom Crispin
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    What is you explaination? How does the second truck suddenly
    materialise in the tunnel?


    I already posted it in this thread.

    So you did... Those were my initial thoughts - after I had ruled out
    a single truck suddenly dividing into two.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.