I've squatted 530 with a disk and a rib out of place. I could have tripled the weight.
Well jeeniuz, try it with two disks dissolved (gone), one torn with a free floating fragment, arthritis of the spine, and bone spurs. Then get back to me.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:40:43 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:48:25 -0500, MrRobottow <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:48:45 -0500, JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Which simply indicates that you're a weak puss.
No, it indicates I have severe back problems that prevent me from lifting heavy weights.
I've squatted 530 with a disk and a rib out of place. I could have tripled the weight.
Squat 1500 lbs? Only a moron would believe you.
Please post the google link to a post where I ever said that I squatted 1500 pounds. I've never said that. So, not only are you a piece of [censored] loser, you're a liar.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:50:36 -0500, MrRobottow <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
John Hanson said:
I've squatted 530 with a disk and a rib out of place. I could have tripled the weight.
Well jeeniuz, try it with two disks dissolved (gone), one torn with a free floating fragment, arthritis of the spine, and bone spurs. Then get back to me.
I take better care of my body than that. Don't you run 8-10 miles a day or some [censored] like that?
Please post the google link to a post where I ever said that I squatted 1500 pounds. I've never said that. So, not only are you a piece of [censored] loser, you're a liar.
Christ you're stupid. You said "you could've lifted three times that". Fat and stupid Hanscum, that's a bad combo.
Don't you run 8-10 miles a day or some [censored] like that?
Yes, but that's not lifting weights. Running has kept me on my feet. They said I'd be in a wheelchair by the time I was 40. I'm almost 50 now, and running is the only reason.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:49:23 -0500, MrRobotow <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
John Hanson said:
Please post the google link to a post where I ever said that I squatted 1500 pounds. I've never said that. So, not only are you a piece of [censored] loser, you're a liar.
Christ you're stupid. You said "you could've lifted three times that". Fat and stupid Hanscum, that's a bad combo.
"I've squatted 530 with a disk and a rib out of place. I could have tripled the weight." means that I could have done three reps, dumbass.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:28:15 -0500, MrRobotow <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
John Hanson said:
I could have tripled the weight." means that I could have done three reps, dumbass.
When we called you on it, you were silent. Now live with it dumbass.
No. Unlike you, I don't live on Usenet. I have a full time job, I train 3 nights per week and do fun things on weekends like hunt, fish, camp, 4wheel and shoot guns. As a matter of fact, tonight I butchered that deer I shot on Tuesday.
"Art S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"MrRobotow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
John Hanson said:
I could have tripled the weight." means that I could have done three reps, dumbass.
When we called you on it, you were silent. Now live with it dumbass.
Hunh?
You mean that David actually _meant_ his comment? I just figured he was trolling, and didn't bother to correct him.
You _are_ reading David's mind, aren't you?
Art
Well, Art - obviously he could not have meant doing a 1500 lbs squat - but he did say it - "tripled the weight" means just that. "tripled the reps" means something else. This is not rocket science
"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:28:15 -0500, MrRobotow <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
John Hanson said:
I could have tripled the weight." means that I could have done three reps, dumbass.
When we called you on it, you were silent. Now live with it dumbass.
No. Unlike you, I don't live on Usenet. I have a full time job, I train 3 nights per week and do fun things on weekends like hunt, fish, camp, 4wheel and shoot guns. As a matter of fact, tonight I butchered that deer I shot on Tuesday.
Life. Try it sometime.
Seems like you have your [censored] together. Full time job is good. Maybe one day you'll save enough to be able to move out of that crack neighborhood.
No. Unlike you, I don't live on Usenet. I have a full time job, I train 3 nights per week and do fun things on weekends like hunt, fish, camp, 4wheel and shoot guns. As a matter of fact, tonight I butchered that deer I shot on Tuesday.
Hmm, but you do live on usenet, you are unemployed, train your stomach to add another roll, and whacking yourself off with tweezers and a magnifying glass doesn't qualify as "fun things on a weekend".
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:45:25 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
"Art S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"MrRobotow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:04:29 -0600, John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:
> I could have >tripled the weight." means that I could have done three reps, dumbass.
When we called you on it, you were silent. Now live with it dumbass.
Hunh?
You mean that David actually _meant_ his comment? I just figured he was trolling, and didn't bother to correct him.
You _are_ reading David's mind, aren't you?
Art
Well, Art - obviously he could not have meant doing a 1500 lbs squat - but he did say it - "tripled the weight" means just that. "tripled the reps" means something else. This is not rocket science
You're such an idiot. If you were into weights and weight lifting, you would know that doubling a weight is doing two reps and tripling a weight is doing three reps. Try hanging out in a weights forum some time. You might learn something. Oh, that's right. This is a weights forum.
"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:45:25 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
"Art S" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"MrRobotow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:04:29 -0600, John Hanson > <[email hidden]> wrote: > >> I could have >>tripled the weight." means that I could have done three reps, dumbass. > > When we called you on it, you were silent. Now live with it dumbass.
Hunh?
You mean that David actually _meant_ his comment? I just figured he was trolling, and didn't bother to correct him.
You _are_ reading David's mind, aren't you?
Art
Well, Art - obviously he could not have meant doing a 1500 lbs squat - but he did say it - "tripled the weight" means just that. "tripled the reps" means something else. This is not rocket science
You're such an idiot. If you were into weights and weight lifting, you would know that doubling a weight is doing two reps and tripling a weight is doing three reps. Try hanging out in a weights forum some time. You might learn something. Oh, that's right. This is a weights forum.
You're such a piece of [censored].
Everyone knows that. You think I'm stupid or something?