I just read the article again about Beloki and I am wondering why he left Saiz after he had stated his intent to stay? There is always the possibility that the money is better but I really thought Beloki was most concerned about being on a strong team.
The roster on his new team looks pretty weak and I guess he is counting on a wild card invitation to the Tour based in his excellent previous results.
Saiz was thought to be joining Stayers until recently (see CyclingNews). However, if I was Beloki, I'd have to consider Saiz's rather abysmal record in 3-week stage race GC. The '03 Vuelta is just the latest example. But even Jalabert noted in the mid '90's that Saiz's approach to racing didn't prepare the riders properly for the Tour.
Dan
Nick Burns said:
I just read the article again about Beloki and I am wondering why he left Saiz after he had stated his intent to stay? There is always the possibility that the money is better but I really thought Beloki was most concerned about being on a strong team.
The roster on his new team looks pretty weak and I guess he is counting on a wild card invitation to the Tour based in his excellent previous results.
"Nick Burns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I just read the article again about Beloki and I am wondering why he left Saiz after he had stated his intent to stay? There is always the possibility that the money is better but I really thought Beloki was most concerned about being on a strong team.
The roster on his new team looks pretty weak and I guess he is counting on a wild card invitation to the Tour based in his excellent previous results.
Any other ideas or comments?
I think Cyclingnews had some comments from Saiz about the same time the Liberty Seguros team was announced that Beloki needed to ask Saiz for a spot on the team, that Saiz wasn't going to come forward to ask him to join.
OK, lemme see if I have this straight...Beloki held out for a while during the sponsor search. Beloki and Saiz both eventually come to an agreement (tentatively at least) with Stayer to join that team (as opposed to taking over ONCE sponsorship) and then a few days later Saiz announces the liberty Seguros insurance company sponsor that will take over ONCE and that Beloki needs to take the initiative to ask for a spot on the Liberty Seguros team? (all in one breath)
I just read the article again about Beloki and I am wondering why he left Saiz after he had stated his intent to stay? There is always the possibility that the money is better but I really thought Beloki was most concerned about being on a strong team.
The roster on his new team looks pretty weak and I guess he is counting on a wild card invitation to the Tour based in his excellent previous results.
OK, lemme see if I have this straight...Beloki held out for a while during the sponsor search. Beloki and Saiz both eventually come to an agreement (tentatively at least) with Stayer to join that team (as opposed to taking over ONCE sponsorship) and then a few days later Saiz announces the liberty Seguros insurance company sponsor that will take over ONCE and that Beloki needs to take the initiative to ask for a spot on the Liberty Seguros team? (all in one breath)
It certainly gives the impression that Saiz is a pissy little man with a big ego, doesn't it?
OK, lemme see if I have this straight...Beloki held out for a while during the sponsor search. Beloki and Saiz both eventually come to an agreement (tentatively at least) with Stayer to join that team (as opposed to taking over ONCE sponsorship) and then a few days later Saiz announces the liberty Seguros insurance company sponsor that will take over ONCE and that Beloki needs to take the initiative to ask for a spot on the Liberty Seguros team? (all in one breath)
It certainly gives the impression that Saiz is a pissy little man with a big ego, doesn't it?
It seems like Saiz -has- to be in charge of the whole shooting match. No "I'm working for..." in his world. Beloki stuck by Saiz for a long time while he searched for a new sponsor, possibly missing out on employment by a couple of decent teams. I think it's ridiculous that Saiz expected Beloki to go with him (and beg for the chance to, at that...) after they had gotten things pretty much dialed in at Stayer. Who's left with Saiz, anyway? Nozal and de Galdeano are it, as far as I can remember.
-- tanx, Howard
"Danger, you haven't seen the last of me!" "No, but the first of you turns my stomach!" Firesign Theatre
"Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
It certainly gives the impression that Saiz is a pissy little man with a
big ego, doesn't
Quoted message said:
it?
I never really cared for him. He had a few good ideas but I think the success during the 90s allowed his head to get even bigger than his gut. I had the sense that it interfered with his riders when certain patterns emerged. It just does not seem like the racers are allowed to make very many decisions on their own. I also remember when they brought Giant in with the first sloping top tube (I think?) frames on the road and he was talking about it as if this was a personal achievement. In fact, there were many times that he has gloats when he should have pointed to the work of others. I guess he feels like a wannabe with no racing palmares and a body like the Michelin man, leading some of the finest athletes in the world.
I hope Beloki does well, but he has to dethrone Lance just to keep people from getting bored with him! Imagine being in that position! Seriously though, I think Beloki needs to keep up the good work because I sure appreciate his consistent form, but I would like to see him go for a stage win or two. I know he sorted of tried once but if I were him in next year's Tour and Lance is battling it out with Jan, I would definitely put that as a higher priority than he has in the past and probably at this point far more important than another third behind those two (like he did in 2001).
Nick Burns <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws [email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Carl Sundquist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
It certainly gives the impression that Saiz is a pissy little man with a
big ego, doesn't
Quoted message said:
it?
I never really cared for him. He had a few good ideas but I think the success during the 90s allowed his head to get even bigger than his gut. I had the sense that it interfered with his riders when certain patterns emerged. It just does not seem like the racers are allowed to make very
many
Quoted message said:
decisions on their own. I also remember when they brought Giant in with
the
Quoted message said:
first sloping top tube (I think?) frames on the road and he was talking about it as if this was a personal achievement. In fact, there were many times that he has gloats when he should have pointed to the work of
others.
Quoted message said:
I guess he feels like a wannabe with no racing palmares and a body like
the
Quoted message said:
Michelin man, leading some of the finest athletes in the world.
At the same time, I think he (Saiz) is very involved with what he does. He often phones all his riders and knows what they are up to. Many of them appreciate this. I think he can be very motivating. Perhaps they all feel they're part of the team when he's in charge, as he gives attention to every one.