Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

beginner racing bike

Started by Ron Bott · · Last activity · 17 posts · 1,439 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
3 July 2004
Last activity
7 July 2004
Original author
Ron Bott
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,439
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I would like to return to some road racing after a layoff of
    about 10 years. While recently looking at some equipment, I
    felt a bit overwhelmed by the options, variety, as well as
    the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike
    with a Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus components. I
    guess the thought was the bike would be reasonably priced,
    perform well, but not be overly expensive to replace parts,
    etc. when the eminent crashes of beginner racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only
    aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap
    on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over time.
    Obviously with changes in construction, materials, etc.
    things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always
    preferred the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group in
    the heirachy that would be recommended for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry
    level racing setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would
    like a nice, solid bike, but it needn't be overly
    extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that would matter for
    frame slection materials.

    Thanks in advance- Ron Bott

  2. "Ron Bott" wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only
    aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap
    on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over time.
    Obviously with changes in construction, materials, etc.
    things are different today?

    Things are not much different in terms of longevity,
    although alu frames have expanded their influence into some
    of the most expensive frames you can buy. Consider getting a
    used bike, maybe from e-bay or rec.bicycles.marketplace
    where you can get more bike for your buck. If you prefer
    new, and are price conscious you will more than likely end
    up with an aluminum bike, but good steel can be had. Even
    titanium, from r.b.r's own Mark Hickey:
    habcycles.comroad.html

    Quoted message said:

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always
    preferred the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group
    in the heirachy that would be recommended for racing?

    I'm partial to Campy Chorus too, although Shimano is less
    expensive often more easily available. You can look over
    Campy components here:
    campagnolo.comnewprodc.php They market CENTAUR
    as their "groupset introducing the hi-end of the
    Campagnolo range."

    Quoted message said:

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry
    level racing setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would
    like a nice, solid bike, but it needn't be overly
    extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that would matter
    for frame slection materials.

    For starters you might look at Gunnar (esp. for good,
    inexpensive steel):
    waterfordbikes.comindex.htm

    Giant: giant-bicycle.comdefault 200406.asp

    Raleigh: raleighusa.comraleighusa.com

  3. Ron Bott said:

    I would like to return to some road racing after a layoff
    of about 10 years. While recently looking at some
    equipment, I felt a bit overwhelmed by the options,
    variety, as well as the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike
    with a Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus components.
    I guess the thought was the bike would be reasonably
    priced, perform well, but not be overly expensive to
    replace parts, etc. when the eminent crashes of beginner
    racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only
    aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap
    on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over time.
    Obviously with changes in construction, materials, etc.
    things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always
    preferred the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group
    in the heirachy that would be recommended for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry
    level racing setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would
    like a nice, solid bike, but it needn't be overly
    extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that would matter
    for frame slection materials.

    Beginner? The beginners I know use Tiagra if they're lucky!

    Most basic frames are alu these days, and the fat
    tubes prevent the metal fatiguing as quickly as the
    old Vitus ones.

    I would try and get 10-speed Campag if possible, as that's
    what everyone else will be using and it's filtering down to
    the lower groups each year.

  4. Ron Bott said:

    I would like to return to some road racing after a layoff
    of about 10 years. While recently looking at some
    equipment, I felt a bit overwhelmed by the options,
    variety, as well as the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike
    with a Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus components.
    I guess the thought was the bike would be reasonably
    priced, perform well, but not be overly expensive to
    replace parts, etc. when the eminent crashes of beginner
    racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only
    aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap
    on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over time.
    Obviously with changes in construction, materials, etc.
    things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always
    preferred the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group
    in the heirachy that would be recommended for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry
    level racing setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would
    like a nice, solid bike, but it needn't be overly
    extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that would matter
    for frame slection materials.


    The conservative choice would still be a good steel race
    frame with Campagnolo Centaur at about $1500 &up or with
    Chorus at $2300 &up, custom built with handbuilt wheels and
    race quality peripherals, tubs or clinchers.

    Factory bikes will generally be a little less but then
    you'll need to negotiate parts swaps with the dealer to get
    the exact setup you desire.

    Neither steel or aluminum are altogether better or worse,
    there being a range of materials, techniques, designs and
    quality control ( Or lack thereof) in both.

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1
    April, 1971

  5. In article
    <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only
    aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap
    on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over time.
    Obviously with changes in construction, materials, etc.
    things are different today?

    All aluminum frames will eventually fail. The test is how
    long it will be before they fail. When a German magazine did
    a tes on frames a Cannondale was one of the frames they
    could not break. How the frame is built is more important
    than the material.

    Quoted message said:

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I always
    preferred the Campy stuff. What would be the lowest group
    in the heirachy that would be recommended for racing?

    Veloce is nice stuff.

    Quoted message said:

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good entry
    level racing setups. I'll be starting off in Cat 5, would
    like a nice, solid bike, but it needn't be overly
    extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that would matter
    for frame slection materials.

    I would look at an inexpensice aluminum frame that fits
    well. I don't see you getting much extra with the mondo
    dollar aluminum frames.
    -----------
    Alex

  6. In article
    <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only
    aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad rap
    on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over time.
    Obviously with changes in construction, materials, etc.
    things are different today?

    One more thing. I remember the Vitus frames and I never
    heard of any of them having fatigue failures. I heard of
    many bond failues, these frames were bonded. I owned one for
    more than 15k miles and I never had any problems with the
    frame. I kinda wish I had kept that bike.
    -------------
    Alex

  7. Campy Shampy.... I'm a DA guy, but you can get a sweet bike
    with Ultegra that will treat you just fine. If you haven't
    ridden or researched a Cannondale bike, I would highy
    recommend starting there. Their stock alu CAD7 frames come
    race ready(with components choices galore). As always, don't
    take my/anyone elses word for it, try a handful of bikes
    (fitted properly of course) then figure it out yourself.

    Oh yeah, you might want to try saddling a Cannondale (like
    a low/mid-priced R1000) first, it will save you time and
    money 🙂...

    Take a peek below if ya feel urge...

    Scottt

    cannondale.commodel 4RR1D.html

    A Muzi <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Ron Bott said:

    I would like to return to some road racing after a
    layoff of about 10 years. While recently looking at some
    equipment, I felt a bit overwhelmed by the options,
    variety, as well as the prices.

    Last time I started racing, it was common to grab a bike
    with a Columbus SL frame and Ultegra or Chorus
    components. I guess the thought was the bike would be
    reasonably priced, perform well, but not be overly
    expensive to replace parts, etc. when the eminent
    crashes of beginner racing occurred.

    I have a few questions about some current bikes:

    I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day the only
    aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the bad
    rap on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over
    time. Obviously with changes in construction, materials,
    etc. things are different today?

    Looks like more groups of componentry available. I
    always preferred the Campy stuff. What would be the
    lowest group in the heirachy that would be recommended
    for racing?

    Basically I'm looking for some suggestions for good
    entry level racing setups. I'll be starting off in Cat
    5, would like a nice, solid bike, but it needn't be
    overly extravigent. I'm also about 140lbs. if that would
    matter for frame slection materials.


    The conservative choice would still be a good steel race
    frame with Campagnolo Centaur at about $1500 &up or with
    Chorus at $2300 &up, custom built with handbuilt wheels
    and race quality peripherals, tubs or clinchers.

    Factory bikes will generally be a little less but then
    you'll need to negotiate parts swaps with the dealer to
    get the exact setup you desire.

    Neither steel or aluminum are altogether better or worse,
    there being a range of materials, techniques, designs and
    quality control ( Or lack thereof) in both.

  8. ronbott-<< I see quite a bit of aluminum. Back in the day
    the only aluminum I remember were the Vitus frames, and the
    bad rap on those were that the aluminum would fatigue over
    time. Obviously with changes in construction, materials,
    etc. things are different today? >><BR><BR>

    Aluminum is cheap and easy to manufacture, hence a lot of
    aluminum. An aluminum frameset can work for you, a stoopid
    light one will not last.

    ronbott-<< I always preferred the Campy stuff. What would be
    the lowest group in the heirachy that would be recommended
    for racing? >><BR><BR>

    Any group will 'work for racing'. Gruppos won't make you
    faster or slower. Find a bike shop that can make up a
    package for you. Like less expensive things that may get
    broken in crashes, like rear ders. Spend the $ on the
    frameset and te wheels. The rest is not important .

    Go to a bike shop that will do a fit on you, on a fit cycle.
    Then pick a frameset and then build the bike specifically
    the way you want it. Fit is more important than anything.
    Stay away from bike shops that do the 'stand over, ride
    around the paring lot' type fit.

    I'd say a well fitting aluminum or steel frameset, Veloce
    or Mirage or a mix, or Centaur for a wee biot less weight
    but identical performance. Ideally a good wheel builder
    will build your wheels, not just somebody taking smething
    outta a box.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  9. Jim-<< I'm partial to Campy Chorus too, although Shimano is
    less expensive often more easily available. >><BR><BR>

    Don't get the first part of this. Chorus is cheaper than 10s
    DA, Centaur is certainly going to be less than 10s ultegra.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  10. "Qui si parla Campagnolo " wrote...

    Quoted message said:


    Don't get the first part of this. Chorus is cheaper than
    10s DA, Centaur


    is

    Quoted message said:

    certainly going to be less than 10s ultegra.

    I was just thinking Record ($1689.00) to DA ($1289.00),
    Chorus ($1229.00) to Ultegra ($659.00) as a top-of-the-line
    to top-, second-to-second comparison. So Chorus is cheaper
    than DA but more expensive than Ultegra. Never mind that in
    your and my opinion the Chorus is a far better groupset than
    the Ultegra. Prices are from Colorado Cyclist just to use a
    ready online reference. Groups are full groups with the same
    list of components included.

    JF

  11. "Qui si parla Campagnolo " <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Jim-<< I was just thinking Record ($1689.00) to DA
    ($1289.00), Chorus ($1229.00) to Ultegra ($659.00) as a
    top-of-the-line to top-, second-to-second


    comparison.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Here we go...ya know a Ford Crown Victoria is way less
    than a Mercedes 500 SEL..both top of the line.

    I think ya gotta look at materials, not heirarchy. It was
    simplier when


    Chorus

    Quoted message said:

    was all aluminum, now with carbon, a bit tougher. BUT I
    compare DA 10s


    with

    Quoted message said:

    Chorus still, Centaur with ultegra. Titanium, of which
    there is about what


    a

    Quoted message said:

    'ti bolt kit' from SRP offered now in 2004 Record(17
    'bits), makes for the price of Record.

    BTW-I doubt you will find DA 10s, WITH hubs for less than
    about $1600.

    Must compare with hubs, as DA 10s hubs are so expensive.


    On the other hand, at the price of $1600 for the group, with
    hubs, DA 10 is *priced* to match Record 10, not Chorus or
    Centaur. The other thing to look at in comparing DA 10 to
    Record 10 is weight. For that same $1600, DA 10 is "lighter"
    than Record 10. Add in the fact that DA 10 appears to be in
    short supply, real or not, plus all the fact that it is the
    *group to get* as all the pros ride it - thus increasing
    demand, and well, you may want to believe that DA 10 is
    "equivalent" to Chorus or Centaur, but the reality of price,
    weight and desireability makes it closer match to Record....

  12. Alex Rodriguez said:

    All aluminum frames will eventually fail. The test is how
    long it will be before they fail. When a German magazine
    did a tes on frames a Cannondale was one of the frames they
    could not break. How the frame is built is more important
    than the material.

    Every time the 'Tour' (iirc) magazine article is mentioned,
    I feel a need to remind everyone that they had to make
    certain compromises to the testing regime - namely they were
    forced to use a high stress / short time accelerated life
    testing approach, rather than the MUCH more expensive and
    time-consuming (but more realistic) "same stress - same
    time" approach.

    The tour test would be appropriate if the bike were to be
    ridden by an 800 pound gorilla with a great sprint,
    though... ;-)

    (suddenly it occurs to me how cool it would be to train an
    800 pound gorilla to ride a bike and put him up against Cipo
    in an exibition race).

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of
    the $695 ti frame

  13. On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:24:16 -0700, Mark Hickey <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Alex Rodriguez said:

    All aluminum frames will eventually fail. The test is how
    long it will be before they fail. When a German magazine
    did a tes on frames a Cannondale was one of the frames
    they could not break. How the frame is built is more
    important than the material.

    Every time the 'Tour' (iirc) magazine article is mentioned,
    I feel a need to remind everyone that they had to make
    certain compromises to the testing regime - namely they
    were forced to use a high stress /

    Careful -- surely you mean load, not stress, right?

    Quoted message said:

    short time accelerated life testing approach, rather than
    the MUCH more expensive and time-consuming (but more
    realistic) "same stress - same time" approach.

    The tour test would be appropriate if the bike were to be
    ridden by an 800 pound gorilla with a great sprint,
    though... ;-)

    (suddenly it occurs to me how cool it would be to train an
    800 pound gorilla to ride a bike and put him up against
    Cipo in an exibition race).

    Now that would be a fine sight to see! But what outfits
    would they wear?!? We'd have to enforce strict
    regulations to ensure Cipo didn't dress up as a gorilla
    or something. ;-)

  14. Quoted message said:

    I would look at an inexpensice aluminum frame that fits
    well. I don't see you getting much extra with the mondo
    dollar aluminum frames.

    Try Cervelo Team Soloist. www.cervelo.com

  15. Mark Hickey said:


    The tour test would be appropriate if the bike were to be
    ridden by an 800 pound gorilla with a great sprint,
    though... ;-)

    (suddenly it occurs to me how cool it would be to train an
    800 pound gorilla to ride a bike and put him up against
    Cipo in an exibition race).

    Would the gorilla shave his legs?

    -=Dave=-

  16. [email hidden] (Qui si parla Campagnolo ) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    BFD-<< On the other hand, at the price of $1600 for the
    group, with hubs, DA 10 is *priced* to match Record 10,
    not Chorus or Centaur. >><BR><BR>

    Well, also remember that mailorder does not a 'standard'
    make. We price DA and Chorus very closely together,
    including hubs. Samo for ultegra(altho we really can't get
    it now) with centaur, Veloce with 105.


    My LBS sells the DA 10 group for $1600. How much do you sell
    your DA 10 group for? Less than $1600?

    Quoted message said:

    BFD<< For that same $1600, DA 10 is "lighter" than Record
    10. >><BR><BR>

    Not so, per the Velonews article of the groups. DA 10s and
    Chorus 10s are about the same.


    Actually, according to the "official" websites, Record is
    the lightest of the 3 groups mentioned. Record 10 group (no
    pedals or headset) weighs in at 2671g, DA 10 group weighs
    2696g and Chorus 10 group weighs 2836. I would say its more
    like DA 10 and Record 10 are "about the same"....

    Quoted message said:

    BFD-<< Add in the fact that DA 10 appears to be in short
    supply, real or not, >><BR><BR>

    You can say that again. We cannot find 10s cogsets.

    BFD<< Chorus or Centaur, but the reality of price, weight
    and desireability makes it closer match to Record....

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Here in the republic, we sell 20-25 Record groups PLUS 15-
    20 Chorus groups for one DA 10s group. OEM, from
    Specialized, Giany, Trek, does not a standard make either.


    Since you appears to be selling so much more Campy 10 than
    DA 10, how much are you selling these groups for?

    Quoted message said:

    BFD-<< all the fact that it is the *group to get* as all
    the pros ride it >><BR><BR>

    TdF has more Campag teams than shimano PLUS, like Dean and
    some other bike stuff(ksyriums), giving it away for free
    or 'bro' deals skews the appearance of what actually
    'sells'.


    Agree, OEM gets the best deal and can "package" a group in a
    *complete* bike for way less than what you, the shops, can
    get it for. That's how mail-order has survived all these
    years.....

  17. Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    ... Here in the republic, we sell 20-25 Record groups PLUS
    15-20 Chorus groups for one DA 10s group....

    And would you not be promoting Campy over Shimano to
    your customers, Mr. Chisholm? Is not this sample
    therefore biased?

    --
    Tom Sherman – Quad City Area

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.