Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Beach Road (Warning)

Started by MikeyOz · · Last activity · 30 posts · 3,375 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
15 May 2007
Last activity
5 June 2007
Original author
MikeyOz
Posts
30
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,375
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–30 of 30
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Michael Warner said:


    Ok, you wear a suit, they wear a suit, you say they threw X out of the car,
    they say they didn't. There are no witnesses, and no evidence that the X
    you produce in court belonged to them. How could anyone possibly be
    convicted on that basis?

    We had bush fires not far from here a few years ago, which apparently was started by a cigarette thrown from a car. After that I have reported around 10 people for throwing cigarette butts from cars. Never been challenged, so I assume they all received a $200 fine.
    And yes it would come down to my word against theirs, but I suspect if they had to appear in court, even if they get off, they won't litter again. And if they do it again and get court, I bet they won't get off.

  2. [quote="coppershark"]

    Michael Warner said:

    On Thu, 17 May 2007 08:35:37 +1000, dgarry wrote:

    Would your word be enough for a conviction if they chose to fight it?

    --

    In the Courts the Magistrate/Judge and Jury listens to the evidence then decides who is most believable, the accused or the witnesses for the prosecution.

    So, dress conservatively and state your case as clearly as you can.
    Judges have a lot of experience at determining which of the parties is telling porkies!

    Mike


    And don't embellish your evidence, even if you think it will help. If you didn't see the person throw the item but it came from the area of the car's window, say that you saw it come from the area of the car's window. Defence lawyers just love picking up little things like that to cast doubt on a prosecution witness's honesty/accuracy/memory/eyesight.

    And, when you go to court, in addition to wearing a suit and tie, make sure that you are clean shaven, male, mid-40s, of northern European descent, university educated and over 186cm tall.

    SteveA

  3. SteveA said:


    And, when you go to court, in addition to wearing a suit and tie, make sure that you are clean shaven, male, mid-40s, of northern European descent, university educated and over 186cm tall.

    Well that's me fkd.

    Let alone the gender change, where the hell am I gonna find a extra 31cm in height in a hurry?

  4. cfsmtb said:
    SteveA said:


    And, when you go to court, in addition to wearing a suit and tie, make
    sure that you are clean shaven, male, mid-40s, of northern European
    descent, university educated and over 186cm tall.

    Well that's me fkd.

    Let alone the gender change, where the hell am I gonna find a extra
    31cm in height in a hurry?

    There may be hope for me though. I just need to grow 22 cm in 10 years.

    --
    Bean

    "I've got a bike
    You can ride it if you like
    It's got a basket
    A bell that rings
    And things to make it look good
    I'd give it to you if I could
    But I borrowed it" Pink Floyd

    Remove "yourfinger" before replying

  5. On May 25, 2:56 pm, cfsmtb <cfsmtb.2r4...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:
    SteveA said:

    And, when you go to court, in addition to wearing a suit and tie, make
    sure that you are clean shaven, male, mid-40s, of northern European
    descent, university educated and over 186cm tall.

    Well that's me fkd.

    Let alone the gender change, where the hell am I gonna find a extra
    31cm in height in a hurry?

    --
    cfsmtb

    In your case, get a lawyer that fits the bill. Steve has discount
    rates for A.B.-ers 😄DD

    Donga

  6. Donga said:

    On May 25, 2:56 pm, cfsmtb <cfsmtb.2r4...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:
    SteveA said:

    And, when you go to court, in addition to wearing a suit and tie, make
    sure that you are clean shaven, male, mid-40s, of northern European
    descent, university educated and over 186cm tall.

    Well that's me fkd.

    Let alone the gender change, where the hell am I gonna find a extra
    31cm in height in a hurry?

    --
    cfsmtb

    In your case, get a lawyer that fits the bill. Steve has discount
    rates for A.B.-ers 😄DD

    Donga


    It's all about the assumptions people make when they use stereo-typing to make decisions.

    Many years ago, I was doing some work in Sydney and I was staying at the Sebel in Kings Cross. One night, a colleague and I were walking back through the Cross to our hotel after work . My colleague was a chap called Ken Wong. A tout at one of the strip clubs called out to us, "Come on in. Twelve girls on stage all the time. Audience participation..."

    "And, sir, you can bring your foreign friend in as well."

    Ken's answer - "Steve's not foreign, he's an Aussie like me."

    (Wongie was a fourth generation Australian and at the time was my boss. I pretty well fit the description in the courtroom stereotype. Ken's response in the story above should be delivered in a broad Aussie accent.)

    SteveA

  7. cfsmtb said:

    Let alone the gender change, where the hell am I gonna find a extra
    31cm in height in a hurry?

    My brother is a ceiling fixer. He has a pair of 'shoes' taller than that.
    http://www.perthplasterboard.com.au/products.asp
    Dura-stilts

    Theo

  8. SteveA said:

    Many years ago, I was doing some work in Sydney and I was staying at
    the Sebel in Kings Cross. One night, a colleague and I were walking
    back through the Cross to our hotel after work . My colleague was a
    chap called Ken Wong. A tout at one of the strip clubs called out to
    us, "Come on in. Twelve girls on stage all the time. Audience
    participation..."

    "And, sir, you can bring your foreign friend in as well."

    Ken's answer - "Steve's not foreign, he's an Aussie like me."

    (Wongie was a fourth generation Australian and at the time was my
    boss. I pretty well fit the description in the courtroom stereotype.
    Ken's response in the story above should be delivered in a broad
    Aussie accent.)

    So how was the 'show'?

    Theo

  9. DAMN , I'm only 181cm tall. I guess if you don't believe someone less
    than 186cm then I'd better 'fess up. I'm really only 180cm.

    Wilfred

    SteveA said:
    coppershark said:
    Quoted message said:

    Michael Warner Wrote:
    On Thu, 17 May 2007 08:35:37 +1000, dgarry wrote:

    Would your word be enough for a conviction if they chose to fight it?

    --

    In the Courts the Magistrate/Judge and Jury listens to the evidence
    then decides who is most believable, the accused or the witnesses for
    the prosecution.

    So, dress conservatively and state your case as clearly as you can.
    Judges have a lot of experience at determining which of the parties is
    telling porkies!

    Mike> >


    And don't embellish your evidence, even if you think it will help.
    If you didn't see the person throw the item but it came from the area
    of the car's window, say that you saw it come from the area of the
    car's window. Defence lawyers just love picking up little things
    like that to cast doubt on a prosecution witness's
    honesty/accuracy/memory/eyesight.

    And, when you go to court, in addition to wearing a suit and tie,
    make sure that you are clean shaven, male, mid-40s, of northern
    European descent, university educated and over 186cm tall.

    SteveA

  10. quote='Theo Bekkers'SteveA said:

    Many years ago, I was doing some work in Sydney and I was staying at
    the Sebel in Kings Cross. One night, a colleague and I were walking
    back through the Cross to our hotel after work . My colleague was a
    chap called Ken Wong. A tout at one of the strip clubs called out to
    us, "Come on in. Twelve girls on stage all the time. Audience
    participation..."

    "And, sir, you can bring your foreign friend in as well."

    Ken's answer - "Steve's not foreign, he's an Aussie like me."

    (Wongie was a fourth generation Australian and at the time was my
    boss. I pretty well fit the description in the courtroom stereotype.
    Ken's response in the story above should be delivered in a broad
    Aussie accent.)

    So how was the 'show'?

    Theo[/QUOTE]
    I've gotta say that 'audience participation' was not the attraction that the spruiker thought it was. Certainly not for me. We walked on by.

    SteveA

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.