UK and Europe · Public discussion

BBC Top Gear Madness

Started by Tony W · · Last activity · 22 posts · 2,235 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
2 April 2003
Last activity
6 April 2003
Original author
Tony W
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,235
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I received the following a few minutes ago in my capacity as a candidate in the local elections (I
    have munged references to party as that is irrelevant the stupidity of the idea and to URC)

    "Request from Top Gear

    BBC 1 TOP GEAR is making a piece entitled "fastest political party". This will involve a candidate
    or elected representative of each of the three parties being given a rally-driving lesson at a track
    in Surrey, racing around the course and then filming a piece in the studio at a later date.

    They are looking for a Monster Raving Loony MP/councillor/MSP/AM/candidate who can handle a rally
    car and would be willing to participate. Please contact Andy Pandy in the Press Office if you're
    interested"

    My reply to our party hack was:-

    "Are we sure we want to encourage a bunch of mindless petrol-heads?

    Surely there are many better points that we should be trying to get over regarding sustainable,
    integrated transport systems; the health benefits of walking and cycling; the need to control
    the car if it is not to strangle the freedom it is supposed to bring from our cities and
    countryside; the desirability of reducing speed to reduce the toll of nearly 3000 dead on our
    roads each year etc. etc.

    Perhaps the MRL participant could demonstrate his/her contempt for the master plan by driving the
    course to be the safest and most economical driver??"

    Heads up folks -- be ready to protest to the BBC about such a mindless pandering to the brain dead
    petrol-heads.

    T

    Tony

  2. Quoted message said:

    Heads up folks

    Did you *have* to?

    Far too many baseball references (and this one in particular) are creeping into uk newsgroup
    vernacular.

    F A

  3. Clarkson...!!! Top Gear...!!! If they weren't so funny.

    They did a similar thing last year with grannies, religious leaders and others. As it was on an
    airfield racing track, I felt that it was fair enough. Motor sport has its place.

    I got far more upset by a Clarkson article in the Sunday Times last year in which he admitted
    driving from Devon to his Chipping Campden home at an average speed of 93 miles per hour. This
    included, by his own admission, stopping in that car-park known as Stroud.

    His reason for doing this? So that he could be home in time for his daughter's birthday party!

    I suggested that the number of daughters capable of having birthdays would be maximised if ar**holes
    like him didn't drive at such reckless speeds.

    Never got an answer.

    Peter.

    "Tony W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I received the following a few minutes ago in my capacity as a candidate


    in

    Quoted message said:

    the local elections (I have munged references to party as that is


    irrelevant

    Quoted message said:

    the stupidity of the idea and to URC)

    "Request from Top Gear

    BBC 1 TOP GEAR is making a piece entitled "fastest political party". This will involve a candidate
    or elected representative of each of the three parties being given a rally-driving lesson at a
    track in Surrey, racing around the course and then filming a piece in the studio at a later date.

    They are looking for a Monster Raving Loony MP/councillor/MSP/AM/candidate who can handle a rally
    car and would be willing to participate. Please contact Andy Pandy in the Press Office if you're
    interested"

    My reply to our party hack was:-

    "Are we sure we want to encourage a bunch of mindless petrol-heads?

    Surely there are many better points that we should be trying to get over regarding sustainable,
    integrated transport systems; the health benefits


    of

    Quoted message said:

    walking and cycling; the need to control the car if it is not to strangle the freedom it is
    supposed to bring from our cities and countryside; the desirability of reducing speed to reduce
    the toll of nearly 3000 dead on


    our

    Quoted message said:

    roads each year etc. etc.

    Perhaps the MRL participant could demonstrate his/her contempt for the master plan by driving the
    course to be the safest and most economical driver??"

    Heads up folks -- be ready to protest to the BBC about such a mindless pandering to the brain dead
    petrol-heads.

    T

    Tony

  4. In a brief moment of lucidity Tony W scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    I received the following a few minutes ago in my capacity as a candidate in the local elections (I
    have munged references to party as that is irrelevant the stupidity of the idea and to URC)

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Surely there are many better points that we should be trying to get over regarding sustainable,
    integrated transport systems; the health benefits of walking and cycling; the need to control the
    car if it is not to strangle the freedom it is supposed to bring from our cities and countryside;
    the desirability of reducing speed to reduce the toll of nearly 3000 dead on our roads each year
    etc. etc.

    If you think so, then why not go on the show and do that, instead of whinging about it to no-one in
    particular.

    Quoted message said:

    Heads up folks -- be ready to protest to the BBC about such a mindless pandering to the brain dead
    petrol-heads.

    Nope, I see no problem in a 'bit of fun' .. 😉

    --

    Completed 1562 Seti work units in 11835 hours setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edusetiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu

  5. "al_Mossah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I got far more upset by a Clarkson article in the Sunday Times last year


    in

    Quoted message said:

    which he admitted driving from Devon to his Chipping Campden home at an average speed of 93 miles
    per hour. This included, by his own admission, stopping in that car-park known as Stroud.

    In a recent article in the Sunday Thymes a test driver admitted to crashing an expensive car causing
    £7000 worth of damage to it. The point of the article was to highlight the embarrassment she felt
    when handing it back to the manufacturer post test, she commented that she had been on all kinds of
    driving courses and had been trained to a high level. Fair enough had the crash occurred on a closed
    track but in fact it happened on a public road in Italy when she encountered mud on the road when
    cornering fast.

    Kind of blows a hole in the argument put forth by a certain Mr. Scmidt implying that those who are
    well trained can determine their own maximum speed.

    Pete

  6. "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In a brief moment of lucidity Tony W scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    I received the following a few minutes ago in my capacity as a candidate in the local elections
    (I have munged references to party as that is irrelevant the stupidity of the idea and to URC)

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Surely there are many better points that we should be trying to get over regarding sustainable,
    integrated transport systems; the health benefits of walking and cycling; the need to control
    the car if it is not to strangle the freedom it is supposed to bring from our cities and
    countryside; the desirability of reducing speed to reduce the toll of nearly 3000 dead on our
    roads each year etc. etc.

    If you think so, then why not go on the show and do that, instead of whinging about it to no-one
    in particular.

    Quoted message said:

    Heads up folks -- be ready to protest to the BBC about such a mindless pandering to the brain
    dead petrol-heads.

    Nope, I see no problem in a 'bit of fun' .. 😉

    --

    Quoted message said:

    Completed 1562 Seti work units in 11835 hours setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edusetiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu

    I'm looking forward to seeing it, I love cars, especially ones driven fast (and safe of course)!

    But then, I am entitled to my opinion, as is everyone else.

    --
    Mark
    ____________________________
    Practice does not make perfect... Perfect practice makes perfect

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.465 / Virus Database: 263 - Release Date: 25/03/03

  7. In "]news:[email hidden], Farmer Alfalfa <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Heads up folks

    Did you *have* to?

    Far too many baseball references (and this one in particular) are

    I didn't know it came from baseball (although this would make sense); always thought it was just a
    general warning for those around to beware of an object dropped or thrown object from on high, where
    there is risk of being *brained* by said object.

    In this context myself (and many of my friends) consider it quite illogical; the word "up" may of
    course make people look *up* (and thus into the path of the flying object they should be
    *avoiding*). The "correct" shout (at least in the UK) is IMO just "Heads!" - which I certainly
    remember from schooldays as a warning of an incoming flying object.

    In my circle of friends, it was often uttered when rigging raves, sound systems etc esp lighting.

    There was even a long discussion on rec.arts.theatre.stagecraft some years ago about this!

    Incidentally what do cyclists (esp MTB'ers) on group rides normally say to warn their colleagues of
    an oncoming overhead hazard (such as a branch)?

    Alex

  8. "Tony W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I received the following a few minutes ago in my capacity as a candidate


    in

    Quoted message said:

    the local elections (I have munged references to party as that is


    irrelevant

    Quoted message said:

    the stupidity of the idea and to URC)

    "Request from Top Gear

    BBC 1 TOP GEAR is making a piece entitled "fastest political party". This will involve a candidate
    or elected representative of each of the three parties being given a rally-driving lesson at a
    track in Surrey, racing around the course and then filming a piece in the studio at a later date.

    They are looking for a Monster Raving Loony MP/councillor/MSP/AM/candidate who can handle a rally
    car and would be willing to participate. Please contact Andy Pandy in the Press Office if you're
    interested"

    My reply to our party hack was:-

    "Are we sure we want to encourage a bunch of mindless petrol-heads?

    Surely there are many better points that we should be trying to get over regarding sustainable,
    integrated transport systems; the health benefits


    of

    Quoted message said:

    walking and cycling; the need to control the car if it is not to strangle the freedom it is
    supposed to bring from our cities and countryside; the desirability of reducing speed to reduce
    the toll of nearly 3000 dead on


    our

    Quoted message said:

    roads each year etc. etc.

    Perhaps the MRL participant could demonstrate his/her contempt for the master plan by driving the
    course to be the safest and most economical driver??"

    Heads up folks -- be ready to protest to the BBC about such a mindless pandering to the brain dead
    petrol-heads.

    T

    Tony


    Its only a bit of fun. Get a life

    Neal

  9. "Tony W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I received the following a few minutes ago in my capacity as a candidate


    in

    Quoted message said:

    the local elections (I have munged references to party as that is


    irrelevant

    Quoted message said:

    the stupidity of the idea and to URC)

    "Request from Top Gear

    BBC 1 TOP GEAR is making a piece entitled "fastest political party". This will involve a candidate
    or elected representative of each of the three parties being given a rally-driving lesson at a
    track in Surrey, racing around the course and then filming a piece in the studio at a later date.

    They are looking for a Monster Raving Loony MP/councillor/MSP/AM/candidate who can handle a rally
    car and would be willing to participate. Please contact Andy Pandy in the Press Office if you're
    interested"

    My reply to our party hack was:-

    "Are we sure we want to encourage a bunch of mindless petrol-heads?

    Surely there are many better points that we should be trying to get over regarding sustainable,
    integrated transport systems; the health benefits


    of

    Quoted message said:

    walking and cycling; the need to control the car if it is not to strangle the freedom it is
    supposed to bring from our cities and countryside; the desirability of reducing speed to reduce
    the toll of nearly 3000 dead on


    our

    Quoted message said:

    roads each year etc. etc.

    Perhaps the MRL participant could demonstrate his/her contempt for the master plan by driving the
    course to be the safest and most economical driver??"

    Heads up folks -- be ready to protest to the BBC about such a mindless pandering to the brain dead
    petrol-heads.

    T

    Tony

    Lighten up dude.

  10. In message <[email hidden]>, Tony W <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I received the following a few minutes ago in my capacity as a candidate in the local elections (I
    have munged references to party as that is irrelevant the stupidity of the idea and to URC)

    "Request from Top Gear

    BBC 1 TOP GEAR is making a piece entitled "fastest political party". This will involve a candidate
    or elected representative of each of the three parties being given a rally-driving lesson at a
    track in Surrey, racing around the course and then filming a piece in the studio at a later date.


    <Snip>

    Quoted message said:

    Heads up folks -- be ready to protest to the BBC about such a mindless pandering to the brain dead
    petrol-heads.


    That's the way to win votes - call car drivers 'brain dead'. How many brain dead people in your ward
    are you hoping will vote for you? Good luck, with your attitude to a bit of fun you really need it.
    --
    DP

  11. "Tony W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    nterested"

    My reply to our party hack was:-

    "Are we sure we want to encourage a bunch of mindless petrol-heads?

    But enough about Clarkson.... ;-)

    David E. Belcher

    Dept. of Chemistry, University of York

  12. "Mr R@t (2.3 zulu-alpha) [comms room 2]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally what do cyclists (esp MTB'ers) on group rides normally say to warn their colleagues
    of an oncoming overhead hazard (such as a branch)?

    When on a road bike in a group it's the done thing to point out pot holes, approaching cars etc.

    When off-roading I'm normally fully occupied looking out for myself, if something happens to me
    those following will be forewarned and either take avoiding action or if not quick enough suffer the
    same fate. The SOP then is to laugh if the dismounted rider(s) is obviously ok.

    Very rarely there is time to shout back a warning if the other rider is within earshot, for a low
    branch the warning would be "BRANCH!", for tree stumps "STUMP!" etc but the most common warning
    is "SHIITT!"

    Pete

  13. Quoted message said:

    "Mr R@t (2.3 zulu-alpha) [comms room 2]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally what do cyclists (esp MTB'ers) on group rides normally say to warn their colleagues
    of an oncoming overhead hazard (such as a branch)?

    When on a road bike in a group it's the done thing to point out pot holes, approaching cars etc.

    I recall a joke about the state of Reading's roads (it may have been Guy's joke)

    Riders in most cycling clubs shout "HOLE!" when they see a pothole. In Reading, riders should
    "ROAD!" when they see a decent bit of road in amongst the potholes 🙂

    for tree stumps "STUMP!" etc but the most common warning is "SHIITT!"

    As in avoiding the excrement deposited on the road by a dog or other animal species; or "Oh [censored], I
    am going to crash?"

    Alex

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mr R@t (2.3 zulu-alpha) [comms room 2]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally what do cyclists (esp MTB'ers) on group rides normally say to warn their colleagues
    of an oncoming overhead hazard (such as a branch)?

    When on a road bike in a group it's the done thing to point out pot holes, approaching cars etc.

    The first time I cycled with a group, on a holiday, it took me a good while to get used to the
    terms used by some of the more regular group riders---mainly LCC/London CTC riders. "Oil up", "oil
    down", they'd shout, though they then changed to the more obviously meaningful "car up" and "car
    down". Eventually they realised that "car behind" and "car ahead", or just "CAR!", was more
    understandable to most of the less regular riders---despite the easy to remember mnemonic, "down
    yer throat, up yer bum!"

    Colin

  15. On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:09:06 +0100, Mr R@t (2.3 zulu-alpha) [comms room 2] scrawled: ) Incidentally
    what do cyclists (esp MTB'ers) on group rides normally say to ) warn their colleagues of an oncoming
    overhead hazard (such as a branch)?

    Normally "Wagh! *bong* Watch out for that (distant *bong*)." Although in the vice-versa, when
    cycling with my girlfriend she often hoots like an owl to let me know she's doing fine and I don't
    have to turn round. I have yet to be caught out by a real owl.

    J-P
    --
    "Originally patents were a bargain to protect a little man with a brilliant invention. Now they're
    held by big corporates, and often extended beyond the lifetime of the product."

  16. "Mr R@t (2.3 zulu-alpha) [comms room 2]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Incidentally what do cyclists (esp MTB'ers) on group rides normally say to warn their colleagues
    of an oncoming overhead hazard (such as a branch)?

    "Duck!"

    F A

  17. Farmer Alfalfa said:

    "Duck!"

    Chocolate?

  18. Quoted message said:

    I hate it when people get there before me! ;-)

    You'll have to cycle faster, then.

  19. On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:43:30 +0000 (UTC), [email hidden] (Geraint

    Jones) said:
    Farmer Alfalfa said:

    "Duck!"

    Chocolate?

    I hate it when people get there before me! ;-)

    James

    --
    A credit limit is NOT a target.

  20. On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:26:44 +0000 (UTC), [email hidden] (Geraint

    Jones) said:
    Quoted message said:

    I hate it when people get there before me! ;-)

    You'll have to cycle faster, then.

    At my weight?

    James

    --
    A credit limit is NOT a target.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.