Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

BB for Stronglight 106 cranks

Started by Benjamin Weiner · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,880 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 October 2003
Last activity
21 October 2003
Original author
Benjamin Weiner
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,880
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a set of Stronglight model 106 cranks - at least that's what I think. 144mm BCD, relief down
    the crank arm and on the spider arms, "106" by the pedal eye, standard 22mm remover threads.

    Do any of you gurus recall what BB these required? Looks like about 120mm spindle and ISO (smaller
    than Shimano) taper to me. I will probably use these for a fixed gear, so that is my intended
    chainline. Thanks.

  2. Benjamin Weiner said:

    I have a set of Stronglight model 106 cranks - at least that's what I think. 144mm BCD, relief
    down the crank arm and on the spider arms, "106" by the pedal eye, standard 22mm remover threads.

    Do any of you gurus recall what BB these required? Looks like about 120mm spindle and ISO (smaller
    than Shimano) taper to me. I will probably use these for a fixed gear, so that is my intended
    chainline. Thanks.


    Then original spindle is an asymmetric 118. Merely flipping it over might be close fr a single ring
    application. The single spindle is an asymmetric 113.

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  3. A Muzi said:

    Then original spindle is an asymmetric 118. Merely flipping it over might be close fr a single
    ring application. The single spindle is an asymmetric 113.

    Thanks, Andrew. Unfortunately I don't have the original spindle, and my collection of spindles (next
    box over from the folders and mutilators) is all the larger JIS taper, I believe.

    I may have a modern Campy 115mm, maybe that would work for a single ring.

  4. Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Then original spindle is an asymmetric 118. Merely flipping it over might be close fr a single
    ring application. The single spindle is an asymmetric 113.

    Benjamin Weiner said:

    Thanks, Andrew. Unfortunately I don't have the original spindle, and my collection of spindles
    (next box over from the folders and mutilators) is all the larger JIS taper, I believe.

    I may have a modern Campy 115mm, maybe that would work for a single ring.

    Great idea. It's the proper taper section and reasonably close. If it isn't dead on, at least you'll
    know where to go from there.

    That's an ongoing battle - estimating the equivalent symmetric length to replace an
    asymmetric spindle.

    Ahead of their time, a Stronglight #113 spindle, I'd say is damnn near symmetric at 56 each side as
    is the equivalent TA
    # 314. (Ijust measured) The double spindle, Stronglight 118, is 56x62mm. That indicates that you
    # certainly could
    flip over a double ( or even a Stronglight #123 or the TA
    #344, #373 or #374) as long as you are not obsessive about
    QFactor.
    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.