Quoted message said:A Muzi said:Then original spindle is an asymmetric 118. Merely flipping it over might be close fr a single
ring application. The single spindle is an asymmetric 113.
Benjamin Weiner said:Thanks, Andrew. Unfortunately I don't have the original spindle, and my collection of spindles
(next box over from the folders and mutilators) is all the larger JIS taper, I believe.
I may have a modern Campy 115mm, maybe that would work for a single ring.
Great idea. It's the proper taper section and reasonably close. If it isn't dead on, at least you'll
know where to go from there.
That's an ongoing battle - estimating the equivalent symmetric length to replace an
asymmetric spindle.
Ahead of their time, a Stronglight #113 spindle, I'd say is damnn near symmetric at 56 each side as
is the equivalent TA
# 314. (Ijust measured) The double spindle, Stronglight 118, is 56x62mm. That indicates that you
# certainly could
flip over a double ( or even a Stronglight #123 or the TA
#344, #373 or #374) as long as you are not obsessive about
QFactor.
--
Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971