Road Cycling · Public discussion

Basso collapses !

Started by Keith · · Last activity · 40 posts · 964 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 May 2005
Last activity
24 May 2005
Original author
Keith
Posts
40
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
964
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 40
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Keith said:
    Robert Chung said:
    Keith said:

    Most unexpected, Simoni and Salvodelli attack and Basso falls back
    immediately,

    I think "collapse" isn't the right word. When I think collapse, I think
    Cadel Evans in the 2002 Giro.

    correct, when I typed that he really looked like he was going to lose
    a lot more time. That will probably happen tomorrow since he appears
    to be having "stomach problems" according to Mr. 60%. Like PDM in 1991
    and Once in 1996 (1997 maybe ?)...

    what a stupid remark!

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    PowerMac G5: 1.6GHz, 1.25GB RAM, 300+80GB Disk, 8xDVD+/-RW, Bluetooth
    mus+tastatur, R9600Pro, iSight, eyeTV200 & LaCie Photon18Vision TFT

  2. Howard Kveck said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, "Jan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    sonarrat said:

    Keith wrote:

    >Most unexpected, Simoni and Salvodelli attack and Basso falls back
    >immediately,

    And as a result of the stage, Garate and Caucchioli launch themselves
    into 5th and 6th, and Scarponi launches himself out of the top 10...

    Speaking of which, how in the hell is Bruseghin holding on to the top
    10??? Fassa has had a few surprise GC performances, but I would never
    have pegged him for it.

    -Sonarrat.

    He's doing well isn't he.
    Cristi Anderson did say on Eurosport a few days ago that Bruseghin had been
    told by FB that he'd be on his own as they would not be supporting him on
    the GC preferring to get Pettachi to stage wins.

    Jan

    He should get an asterisk by his name in the records. Not for the usual
    "done on dope" thing, but "did it with no team support".

    Savoldelli should have the same asterisk, then. Come to think of it, he
    should have it for his 2002 win too - he had freakin' Quaranta on his
    team then.

    -Sonarrat.

  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Keith wrote:
    > Most unexpected, Simoni and Salvodelli attack and Basso falls back
    > immediately,

    I think "collapse" isn't the right word. When I think collapse, I think
    Cadel Evans in the 2002 Giro.

    correct, when I typed that he really looked like he was going to lose
    a lot more time. That will probably happen tomorrow since he appears
    to be having "stomach problems" according to Mr. 60%. Like PDM in 1991
    and Once in 1996 (1997 maybe ?)...

    what a stupid remark!

    sez who ? My point is that now anyone gets "sick", most people with a
    brain and a memory can't help but remember previous "sicknesses", get
    it ?

  4. Keith said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >Keith wrote:
    >> Most unexpected, Simoni and Salvodelli attack and Basso falls back
    >> immediately,
    >
    >I think "collapse" isn't the right word. When I think collapse, I think
    >Cadel Evans in the 2002 Giro.

    correct, when I typed that he really looked like he was going to lose
    a lot more time. That will probably happen tomorrow since he appears
    to be having "stomach problems" according to Mr. 60%. Like PDM in 1991
    and Once in 1996 (1997 maybe ?)...

    what a stupid remark!

    sez who ? My point is that now anyone gets "sick", most people with a
    brain and a memory can't help but remember previous "sicknesses", get
    it ?

    I do get it, i just find the comparason stupid.

    --
    Morten Reippuert Knudsen :-) <http://blog.reippuert.dk>

    PowerMac G5: 1.6GHz, 1.25GB RAM, 300+80GB Disk, 8xDVD+/-RW, Bluetooth
    mus+tastatur, R9600Pro, iSight, eyeTV200 & LaCie Photon18Vision TFT

  5. On 05/21/2005 06:51 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "alex"

    Quoted message said:


    "Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 05/21/2005 05:00 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "amit"

    Quoted message said:

    salvodelli vs. savoldelli.

    incorrect correct

    Quoted message said:

    columbia vs. colombia

    incorrect correct

    Quoted message said:

    peloton vs. peleton.

    correct incorrect

    Ehem!

    Colombia, Savoldelli, peloton.

    I believe that's what I said ... (albeit without capitalization).

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield
    stevens at veloworks dot com
    bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
    ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
    aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
    double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [foreword] slash

  6. On Sun, 22 May 2005 10:11:08 -0600, Fred Marx <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Keith said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>Keith wrote:
    >>
    >>>Most unexpected, Simoni and Salvodelli attack and Basso falls back
    >>>immediately,
    >>
    >>I think "collapse" isn't the right word. When I think collapse, I think
    >>Cadel Evans in the 2002 Giro.
    >
    >correct, when I typed that he really looked like he was going to lose
    >a lot more time. That will probably happen tomorrow since he appears
    >to be having "stomach problems" according to Mr. 60%. Like PDM in 1991
    >and Once in 1996 (1997 maybe ?)...

    what a stupid remark!

    sez who ? My point is that now anyone gets "sick", most people with a
    brain and a memory can't help but remember previous "sicknesses", get
    it ?


    so you're calling Basso a doper, right?

    No, just noting the similarity, i.e. using my brain

  7. "Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Keith said:

    On Sun, 22 May 2005 10:11:08 -0600, Fred Marx <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Keith wrote:
    >>>>Keith wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>Most unexpected, Simoni and Salvodelli attack and Basso falls back
    >>>>>immediately,
    >>>>
    >>>>I think "collapse" isn't the right word. When I think collapse, I


    think

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>Cadel Evans in the 2002 Giro.
    >>>
    >>>correct, when I typed that he really looked like he was going to


    lose

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>a lot more time. That will probably happen tomorrow since he appears
    >>>to be having "stomach problems" according to Mr. 60%. Like PDM in


    1991

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>and Once in 1996 (1997 maybe ?)...
    >>
    >>what a stupid remark!
    >
    >
    > sez who ? My point is that now anyone gets "sick", most people with a
    > brain and a memory can't help but remember previous "sicknesses", get
    > it ?
    >
    so you're calling Basso a doper, right?

    No, just noting the similarity, i.e. using my brain

    I think you used your brain to jump to concusions. It's a tough race,
    and sometimes people get sick. I don't see any similarity myself between
    what happened with PDM and basso. Would you make the same assumption or
    connection about Basso if his DS was someone other than Riis?

    But do you know what exactly happened with PDM?

  8. Jonathan v.d. Sluis said:
    Quoted message said:


    I think you used your brain to jump to concusions. It's a tough


    race,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and sometimes people get sick. I don't see any similarity myself


    between

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    what happened with PDM and basso. Would you make the same


    assumption or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    connection about Basso if his DS was someone other than Riis?

    But do you know what exactly happened with PDM?

    Dumbass -

    The doctor didn't refrigerate the intravenous muscle glycogen
    replacement, it spoiled, they IV'd it and it wiped out the whole team.

    If that happened in this case, why isn't the rest of CSC sick?

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  9. Kurgan Gringioni said:

    The doctor didn't refrigerate the intravenous muscle glycogen
    replacement, it spoiled, they IV'd it and it wiped out the whole team.

    Yes. "Intralipid" it was called.

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  10. Since when is it considered proper etiquete to take a pull?

    Isn't that the problem with all these cat V racers now a days? They go
    straight to the front and hammer to prove how strong they are or
    because they feel obligated, when in reality, they are only killing
    themselves.

    I can recall O'Grady in a break in the TDF last year not doing any work
    because he knew he could win if it came down to a sprint
    (http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/details/articles/6491.0.html)

    If anyone yells at me to take a turn at the front and I'm not inclined,
    I give 'em the bird.

    Rujano was not obligated to take a pull in that break. If Garate beat
    him to the line, Rujano has only himself to blame.

  11. jeremy said:

    Rujano was not obligated to take a pull in that break. If Garate beat
    him to the line, Rujano has only himself to blame.

    Yes, but not for the reason you imply (that he saved himself and still
    he couldn't sprint). It is definitely not "proper etiquette" to take a
    pull, but Garate surely would have been inclined to give Rujano the
    mountain points (and money!), meaning: not contest the sprint for the
    GPM, if he had been helpful in any way. What goes around comes around.

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  12. jeremy said:

    Since when is it considered proper etiquete to take a pull?

    Isn't that the problem with all these cat V racers now a days? They go
    straight to the front and hammer to prove how strong they are or
    because they feel obligated, when in reality, they are only killing
    themselves.

    I can recall O'Grady in a break in the TDF last year not doing any work
    because he knew he could win if it came down to a sprint
    (http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/details/articles/6491.0.html)

    If anyone yells at me to take a turn at the front and I'm not inclined,
    I give 'em the bird.

    Rujano was not obligated to take a pull in that break. If Garate beat
    him to the line, Rujano has only himself to blame.

    Well, yesterday Rujano gave Valjavec 2nd place on the stage with no
    contest. I think this just shows how much he's focused on the very
    specific goal of the Maglia Verde.

    -Sonarrat.

  13. jeremy said:

    Since when is it considered proper etiquete to take a pull?

    Since when? Since forever under circamstances where the rider in
    question has a stake in the pace.

    Quoted message said:

    Isn't that the problem with all these cat V racers now a days? They


    go

    Quoted message said:

    straight to the front and hammer to prove how strong they are or
    because they feel obligated, when in reality, they are only killing
    themselves.

    "These days"? How about, "Hasn't that always been the problem with the
    entrry level categories? Some go straight to the front and it becomes a
    race of attrition. The answer is yeah, much of the time but what does
    that have to do with the Giro?

    Quoted message said:

    I can recall O'Grady in a break in the TDF last year not doing any


    work

    Quoted message said:

    because he knew he could win if it came down to a sprint.

    Quoted message said:

    (http://www.velonews.com/tour2004/details/articles/6491.0.html)

    If O'Grady did not pull, it was NOT exclusievly because he expected to
    win in a sprint. His break had to survive to maximize his chances
    there. As the best pure sprinter of the 3 he had the most options to
    win. He just had to make sure he did not work too much harder than his
    2 companions so they did not get a benefit in the sprint or from an
    attack due to fatigue from his effort. You say he "did not do any
    work", but the report indicates he was active throughout the duration
    of the break. If you are responding to what you saw on TV, then you
    along with most other observers have to remember you have no chance to
    see enough of the race to really know for certain everything that is
    happening. It sounds like he worked his ass off early on and picked up
    some intermediate sprints vitories so he may have stopped working or
    probably just skipped a few turns as they closed in on the final
    sprint. The others could have done the same thing but I bet they
    already accepted their chances of beating him and allowed him to skip a
    few turns to make up for doing so much work earlier. Also, O'Grady
    spent several years racing with Magnus and they may have had some give
    and take agreements including what I said about skipping a few turns to
    even up the workload. The only chance Piil had to beat O'Grady was to
    catch him off guard (either in a very late break off OTF or sprinting
    from his blind spot while he concentrates on Magnus) and "yelling at
    him to take a pull" would be a good way of making that a close to zero
    possibility.

    Quoted message said:

    If anyone yells at me to take a turn at the front and I'm not


    inclined,

    Quoted message said:

    I give 'em the bird.

    Fine, that is your choice and you live with the consequences. I am sure
    most other Cat V dorks don't know hwo to respond to that. You must
    really bring a lot of joy to the sport. In any case, just because
    someone yells doesn't mean you are obligated to do what they say. I
    laugh if anyone ever yelled at me but I don't think it has ever
    happened. IF you don't take a pull then you do not get to influence the
    pace. I am guessing that in your scenario, it was really no big deal
    that you are talking about large groups where nobody really knows what
    they are doing and a few morons yell because of their lame
    misunderstanding about what circumstances obligate a rider to pull.
    Generally speaking, the larger the group the lower your obligation is
    to go anywhere near the front. If you are in a large group in an entry
    level race (as I imagine you to be where you flip "the bird" to the
    other morons yelling at you) then what you really should do is get your
    lame bird-flipping ass out of the way if you are not going to
    contribute to the pace. If I was near the front of a largish group I
    would not be concerned about who was working BUT there have been times
    where I have let guys know when they were screwing things up by being
    overly selfish about their placement. IOW, they wanted to be where they
    perceived the sweet spot to be, but they were preventing a smooth flow
    of the rotation of guys that *were* making the pace. I have never
    yelled and nobody ever got mad at me for helping them understand things
    better. Instead of worrying about some vague sense of what ettiquette
    demands, maybe you need to read some books about the history of the
    sport and racing instead of expecting to get any wisdom about the same
    issues from a NG. Yes there are plenty of wise people posting stuff but
    you won't recognize it from the BS until you are close to the same
    level.

    Quoted message said:

    Rujano was not obligated to take a pull in that break. If Garate


    beat

    Quoted message said:

    him to the line, Rujano has only himself to blame.

    What is the basis for your statement? In your view, under what
    circumstances would he or anyone be obligated? It sounds like you
    believe no such obligation ever exists. Can you give an example of when
    you think someone would be obligated?

  14. On 05/23/2005 12:42 PM, in article
    [email hidden], "Kurgan Gringioni"

    Quoted message said:


    Jonathan v.d. Sluis said:
    Quoted message said:


    I think you used your brain to jump to concusions. It's a tough


    race,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and sometimes people get sick. I don't see any similarity myself


    between

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    what happened with PDM and basso. Would you make the same


    assumption or

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    connection about Basso if his DS was someone other than Riis?

    But do you know what exactly happened with PDM?

    Dumbass -

    The doctor didn't refrigerate the intravenous muscle glycogen
    replacement, it spoiled, they IV'd it and it wiped out the whole team.

    Fat replacement, actually. The substance in question was Intralipid.

    From:
    http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b2.pharmaceutical/b2.1.monographs/CPS-%20Monogra
    phs/CPS-%20(General%20Monographs-%20I)/INTRALIPID.html

    Intralipid acts as an energy source in patients for whom the usual i.v.
    therapy would not be adequate and as a source of essential fatty acids to
    prevent essential fatty acid deficiency.

    Providing sufficient amounts of calories to satisfy basal metabolic
    requirements plus the additional needs imposed by disease and/or surgical
    stress can be difficult and sometimes even impossible. If the i.v. route has
    to be used and only carbohydrates are given as an energy source large
    amounts of fluid or very hypertonic solutions must be employed. Fat has an
    energy value a little more than twice that of carbohydrates, and is
    therefore an excellent source of energy for use in parenteral nutrition. By
    including fat emulsion in the nutritional program a balanced i.v. nutrition
    can be achieved.

    Moreover, Intralipid is practically isotonic with blood which makes it
    possible to infuse large amounts of energy providing substrate in a small
    volume of fluid via peripheral veins. This property makes possible
    peripheral vein infusion of solutions that otherwise have to be administered
    by central veins, (see Dosage, Administration).

    Quoted message said:

    If that happened in this case, why isn't the rest of CSC sick?

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    --
    Steven L. Sheffield
    stevens at veloworks dot com
    bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
    ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
    aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
    double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [foreword] slash

  15. Thanks for your reply, Chris - great comments.

    Quoted message said:

    What is the basis for your statement? In your view, under what
    circumstances would he or anyone be obligated? It sounds like you
    believe no such obligation ever exists. Can you give an example of


    when

    Quoted message said:

    you think someone would be obligated?

    The real statement I was trying to make was that many racers
    (especially new ones) feel that it is their duty to take a pull at the
    front - not to IMPROVE their own position in the race but to PROVE
    their ability or whatever.

    You mentioned several times in your post that it makes sense to take a
    pull to keep the winning break moving, to lead out a sprinter, or
    whatever just as long as it benefits you or your team. I couldn't
    agree more.

    The point of my post was to say that regardless of what is expected by
    someone else, race to benefit yourself, not the competition. If you
    are in a break with three others from different teams, and they are
    yelling at you to take your turn, don't listen unless you feel that you
    will benefit from expending the energy to work. If you are the worst
    sprinter in the break, it might make sense for you to keep the pace
    high to soften the legs of those in your break. If you like your
    chances in the sprint, save yourself until the finish and win it there!

    I've heard people say, "It's good etiquette to take a turn at the
    front." and I say that's [censored]. If you pull through, it better be
    because you see benefit in it - otherwise you are just wasting
    energy.

    If Rujano wants to sit on Garate's wheel all the way up to the top,
    that's his prerogative. But if Rujano waits that long, he better
    believe he can win the sprint to the line or it's his own fault for
    losing those points. For him to say later that he wasn't happy that
    Garate took the points to me says Rujano's ego is trying to win him
    results instead of his sprint.

  16. jeremy said:

    Thanks for your reply, Chris - great comments.

    Quoted message said:

    What is the basis for your statement? In your view, under what
    circumstances would he or anyone be obligated? It sounds like you
    believe no such obligation ever exists. Can you give an example of

    when

    Quoted message said:

    you think someone would be obligated?

    The real statement I was trying to make was that many racers
    (especially new ones) feel that it is their duty to take a pull at the
    front - not to IMPROVE their own position in the race but to PROVE
    their ability or whatever.

    You mentioned several times in your post that it makes sense to take a
    pull to keep the winning break moving, to lead out a sprinter, or
    whatever just as long as it benefits you or your team. I couldn't
    agree more.

    The point of my post was to say that regardless of what is expected by
    someone else, race to benefit yourself, not the competition. If you
    are in a break with three others from different teams, and they are
    yelling at you to take your turn, don't listen unless you feel that you
    will benefit from expending the energy to work. If you are the worst
    sprinter in the break, it might make sense for you to keep the pace
    high to soften the legs of those in your break. If you like your
    chances in the sprint, save yourself until the finish and win it there!

    I've heard people say, "It's good etiquette to take a turn at the
    front." and I say that's [censored]. If you pull through, it better be
    because you see benefit in it - otherwise you are just wasting
    energy.

    If Rujano wants to sit on Garate's wheel all the way up to the top,
    that's his prerogative. But if Rujano waits that long, he better
    believe he can win the sprint to the line or it's his own fault for
    losing those points. For him to say later that he wasn't happy that
    Garate took the points to me says Rujano's ego is trying to win him
    results instead of his sprint.

    As Ewoud says above, it's less a matter of etiquette than of what comes
    around goes around. In the case of a cat 5 race, the numbers are large
    enough that a decision not to contribute to the pace making will not
    likely have any consequences for you. The other distinction worth
    making here is that in the European pro races, the same guys are racing
    one another week after week, season after season - or in the case of a
    grand tour, every day. That means that a decision not to contribute to
    the pace making in a break, is more likely to have consequences, if not
    today, then down the road, because the the likelihood of ending up in a
    break or in a finishing sprint with the same guys is far more likely
    than in a category race. In a cat 5 race, you can choose to sit on a
    break, and yeah, you'll get yelled at, but you can take your upgrade
    points and go. The pro guys are going to be back racing those same guys
    next week. Sometimes the stage win today is worth the risk of
    consequences tomorrow - as in the case of Savoldelli sitting on Basso
    the way to Zoldo Alto. Savoldelli didn't contribute to the pace making,
    and then took the sprint. He might well have paid for that in the
    future, but the stage win was worth more to him than anything Basso
    might choose to do in the future. The repeated interactions between the
    same guys mean that their decisions do have consequences, it's not just
    etiquette.

  17. jc said:

    As Ewoud says above, it's less a matter of etiquette than of what comes
    around goes around. In the case of a cat 5 race, the numbers are large
    enough that a decision not to contribute to the pace making will not
    likely have any consequences for you. The other distinction worth
    making here is that in the European pro races, the same guys are racing
    one another week after week, season after season - or in the case of a
    grand tour, every day.

    Locally we have a lot of the same riders in races each weekend. I'm
    not very familiar with the 5, but in the 4s and higher categories
    where I live (New York in USA) there is a lot of knowing other riders.
    So I don't see the distinction between the pros and local riders.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  18. I am in agreement but let me add that even at the pro level, what goes
    around some times simply remains an isolated incident that is not
    worthy of a grudge. For instance, lots of times guys we are watching in
    the GTs that fail to work when *we* assume they should be and then
    assume they are building up bad karma may have already gotten
    permission to ease up. It just happens for various reasons that are
    never reported to us and I am gone to say that I think MOST incidents
    that come to our attention as fans are not the sort of thing to cause
    riders to seak future revenge. I can only think of a handfull of
    incidents over the years when something was so out of line that is was
    commented on by the guys and the teams involved. The sport is growing
    so much that I think it is more understood now that everyone is
    expected to be selfish. The somments I hear from "the (self appointed)
    gurus may have been fairly accurate up through the late 80s but at this
    point almost anything goes. One final comment, if someone is pissing
    off the others in a smallish group, they are more likely to seek any
    remedy before the guy can capitalize on it. Normallu all that is
    expected of someone "sitting in" is that thay agree to not exploit the
    others by sprinting later or whatever. If they do not agree, they get
    taken care of *before the finish*. If not, that is life. The only
    really outrageous move these days is to sit and and promise not to
    exploit, but then going against your promise. That is the kind of thing
    that will cause someone to fee any wrath later in the stage race,
    season or career. Anything simpler than that is normally forgotten
    almost right away. The feeling is if the others could not deal with the
    culprit then that is racing. It is the deception that causes the wrath
    and nothing else.

  19. Chris M said:

    I am in agreement but let me add that even at the pro level, what goes
    around some times simply remains an isolated incident that is not
    worthy of a grudge. For instance, lots of times guys we are watching in
    the GTs that fail to work when *we* assume they should be and then
    assume they are building up bad karma may have already gotten
    permission to ease up. It just happens for various reasons that are
    never reported to us and I am gone to say that I think MOST incidents
    that come to our attention as fans are not the sort of thing to cause
    riders to seak future revenge. I can only think of a handfull of
    incidents over the years when something was so out of line that is was
    commented on by the guys and the teams involved. The sport is growing
    so much that I think it is more understood now that everyone is
    expected to be selfish. The somments I hear from "the (self appointed)
    gurus may have been fairly accurate up through the late 80s but at this
    point almost anything goes. One final comment, if someone is pissing
    off the others in a smallish group, they are more likely to seek any
    remedy before the guy can capitalize on it. Normallu all that is
    expected of someone "sitting in" is that thay agree to not exploit the
    others by sprinting later or whatever. If they do not agree, they get
    taken care of *before the finish*. If not, that is life. The only
    really outrageous move these days is to sit and and promise not to
    exploit, but then going against your promise. That is the kind of thing
    that will cause someone to fee any wrath later in the stage race,
    season or career. Anything simpler than that is normally forgotten
    almost right away. The feeling is if the others could not deal with the
    culprit then that is racing. It is the deception that causes the wrath
    and nothing else.

    Yep, agreed with what you say here.

    It is entertaining, though, when these little grudges come to light, and
    we see the consequences play themselves out.

  20. John Forrest Tomlinson said:
    jc said:

    As Ewoud says above, it's less a matter of etiquette than of what comes
    around goes around. In the case of a cat 5 race, the numbers are large
    enough that a decision not to contribute to the pace making will not
    likely have any consequences for you. The other distinction worth
    making here is that in the European pro races, the same guys are racing
    one another week after week, season after season - or in the case of a
    grand tour, every day.

    Locally we have a lot of the same riders in races each weekend. I'm
    not very familiar with the 5, but in the 4s and higher categories
    where I live (New York in USA) there is a lot of knowing other riders.
    So I don't see the distinction between the pros and local riders.

    JT

    Depends on where you are, I guess.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.