General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

BARBEQUE WOOD TYPES

Started by D · · Last activity · 16 posts · 899 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 February 2004
Last activity
17 February 2004
Original author
D
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
899
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello, My brother and I have been smoking hogs for years with various methods. We have generally
    always used Oak wood, but on occasion used Hickory, and a real good one is Orange (citrus) tree wood
    which gives a great flavor but alas all of the citrus business has moved further south of here now.
    We always knew to stay away from sap rich woods like pine unless you wanted your meat to taste like
    turpentine. But my question is, I have a continuing supply of hege wood that comes from Sweet
    Viburnum hedge. I've been hauling this stuff off for years and I wonder if one could actually
    barbeque with this wood. I've searched for info on any poisons that might be in the wood with no
    success. Does anyone know of this type of wood being used or any information at all on it ? Thanks
    to all replies.

  2. Quoted message said:

    But my question is, I have a continuing supply of hege wood that comes from Sweet Viburnum hedge.
    I've been hauling this stuff off for years and I wonder if one could actually barbeque with this
    wood. I've searched for info on any poisons that might be in the wood with no success. Does
    anyone know of this type of wood being used or any information at all on it ? Thanks to all
    replies.

    well it does not come up in the poisonous list. there are a lot of great smoking woods. Lilac was
    fantastic. citrus as you found is good. cherry is good. burn some and see if you like the smoke
    smell from it.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices See knight-knight-
    toolworks.com For prices and ordering instructions.

  3. In rec.food.cooking said:

    burn some and see if you like the smoke smell from it.

    Good advice. Just light a small splint and blow it out. Sniff the resulting smoke.

    --
    ...I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...

    - The Who

  4. Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    burn some and see if you like the smoke smell from it.

    Good advice. Just light a small splint and blow it out. Sniff the resulting smoke.

    Lousy advice. You don't know what flavor will be imparted to the meat from that test. There may be
    volatile flavors in the smoke which won't persist in the meat, if it's allowed to cook for a long
    time. A much better test would be to buy some cheap meat and try smoking a batch with the wood.

  5. il Sun, 15 Feb 2004 01:32:32 +0000 (UTC),
    [email hidden] ha scritto:

    Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    burn some and see if you like the smoke smell from it.

    Good advice. Just light a small splint and blow it out. Sniff the resulting smoke.

    Do not try this with Oleander wood, even the smoke is poisonous. Don't you have a Poisons Centre you
    can ring to find out?

    Quoted message said:

    --
    ...I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...

    - The Who

    --
    Cheers, Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ]

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mark Thorson said:
    Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    burn some and see if you like the smoke smell from it.

    Good advice. Just light a small splint and blow it out. Sniff the resulting smoke.

    Lousy advice. You don't know what flavor will be imparted to the meat from that test. There may be
    volatile flavors in the smoke which won't persist in the meat, if it's allowed to cook for a long
    time. A much better test would be to buy some cheap meat and try smoking a batch with the wood.

    Agreed... That is what I'd do too. Some chicken hindquarters might work. :-)

    --
    Sprout the Mung Bean to reply...

    Quoted message said:

    ,,<Cat's Haven Hobby Farm>,,<Katra at centurytel dot net>,,<


    cgi6.ebay.comeBayISAPI.dll

  7. Mark Thorson said:
    Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    burn some and see if you like the smoke smell from it.

    Good advice. Just light a small splint and blow it out. Sniff the resulting smoke.

    Lousy advice. You don't know what flavor will be imparted to the meat from that test. There may be
    volatile flavors in the smoke which won't persist in the meat, if it's allowed to cook for a long
    time. A much better test would be to buy some cheap meat and try smoking a batch with the wood.

    Have you actually cooked much using wood as a flavoring for the food (not just meat)?

    BOB

  8. Mark Thorson said:
    Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    burn some and see if you like the smoke smell from it.

    Good advice. Just light a small splint and blow it out. Sniff the resulting smoke.

    Lousy advice. You don't know what flavor will be imparted to the meat from that test. There may be
    volatile flavors in the smoke which won't persist in the meat, if it's allowed to cook for a long
    time. A much better test would be to buy some cheap meat and try smoking a batch with the wood.

    And don't use oleander wood. HTH :-)

    Best regards, Bob

  9. Mark Thorson said:


    Lousy advice. You don't know what flavor will be imparted to the meat from that test.

    No, good advice. If you get a punget odor or turpentine odor like some softwoods, you know not to
    persue it at all. While a good smoke odor may not be good on meat, I can assure you that bad smoke
    odor will not get better. .

    --
    Ed [email hidden] pages.cthome.netedhome

  10. In rec.food.cooking said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    burn some and see if you like the smoke smell from it.

    Good advice. Just light a small splint and blow it out. Sniff the resulting smoke.

    Quoted message said:

    Lousy advice. You don't know what flavor will be imparted to the meat from that test.

    You do if you are an experienced cook. OTOH, you might get misled.

    HTH.

    --
    ...I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...

    - The Who

  11. BOB said:

    Have you actually cooked much using wood as a flavoring for the food (not just meat)?

    Yes, there was a period of a few years when I was smoking three or more times a week. The vast
    majority of that was meat, though I have done a lot of experiments with non-meat foods. Twice, I
    tried to smoke potato chips (bleah!).

    From my experience, I know that there are flavors in "fresh" smoke which disappear when the food is
    allowed to continue cooking.

  12. "Edwin Pawlowski" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Mark Thorson said:


    Lousy advice. You don't know what flavor will be imparted to the meat from that test.

    No, good advice. If you get a punget odor or turpentine odor like some softwoods, you know not to
    persue it at all. While a good smoke odor may not be good on meat, I can assure you that bad smoke
    odor will not get better. .

    Or maybe like poison ivy the toxins (if any) can be carried in the smoke. If the plant is identified
    as not dangerous to people, by a respectable source... Then perhaps smoke some meat with it.

    --
    Once during Prohibition I was forced to live for days on nothing but food and water.
    --------
    FIELDS, W. C.

  13. Mark Thorson said:
    BOB said:

    Have you actually cooked much using wood as a flavoring for the food (not just meat)?

    Yes, there was a period of a few years when I was smoking three or more times a week. The vast
    majority of that was meat, though I have done a lot of experiments with non-meat foods. Twice, I
    tried to smoke potato chips (bleah!).

    From my experience, I know that there are flavors in "fresh" smoke which disappear when the food
    is allowed to continue cooking.

    Then you should know more about the smells/tastes that would be transferred. Like you just said,
    tastes and smells can disappear. They will *not* just show up. So, what's the problem with making a
    smell test, specifically, why is EskWIRED's comment "Lousy advice."? Maybe it's not complete, but it
    is far from "Lousy".

    BOB cooks more with fire and smoke than with my indoor appliances

  14. In rec.food.cooking said:

    Then you should know more about the smells/tastes that would be transferred.

    Exactly.

    Quoted message said:

    cooks more with fire and smoke than with my indoor appliances

    You too?

    --
    ...I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...

    - The Who

  15. Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    Then you should know more about the smells/tastes that would be transferred.

    Exactly.

    Quoted message said:

    cooks more with fire and smoke than with my indoor appliances

    You too?

    Especially me. Besides the great taste, it costs more to cool the house with the oven/stove running.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    ...I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...

    - The Who

  16. On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:11:14 +0000 (UTC), [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    In rec.food.cooking said:

    Then you should know more about the smells/tastes that would be transferred.

    Exactly.

    Quoted message said:

    cooks more with fire and smoke than with my indoor appliances

    You too?

    i should definitely move in with one or both of you.

    your pal, blake

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.