Which has the higher Ph, the greater alkalinizing effect, baking soda
or dolomite/limestone? If you have an answer for that, could you
explain in a few sentences,also, the difference between a Ph of,say,
7.1 and 7.2. It is not merely a difference of 1.4%, but an
exponential difference, right? Thanks.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Baking Soda vs. Limestone/Dolomite
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 27 November 2004
- Last activity
- 28 November 2004
- Original author
- xyz
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 4,661
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"xyz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Which has the higher Ph, the greater alkalinizing effect, baking soda
or dolomite/limestone? If you have an answer for that, could you
explain in a few sentences,also, the difference between a Ph of,say,
7.1 and 7.2. It is not merely a difference of 1.4%, but an
exponential difference, right? Thanks.Limestone (assume calcium/magnesium carbonate) has a greater ability to take up
protons, i.e. to follow the following reaction:CO3(2-) + H3O(+) --> HCO3(-) + H2O (Calcium is not a participant in this reaction,
nor is magnesium from magnesium carbonate.)The carbonate anion is converted to bicarbonate anion at the expense of one
hydronium (H30+) cation. So, after carbonate reacts with an acidic hydronium, you
end up with bicarbonate and water. Bicarbonate can take up a proton in a similar
reaction, so on a molecule per molecule basis, carbonate has twice the alkalinizing
effect of bicarbonate. In blood chemistry (if there is where you're going with
this), the bicarbonate concentration vastly exceeds that of carbonate, and thus
provides a pH buffering effect. The other controlling variable is CO2 concentration.pH (note the little p, big H), is a symbolic notation. Little p means "minus log
of". H, in this context, means "concentration of hydronium ion".So, to convert pH 7.1 to an actual concentration, you determine the value of 10
^ -7.1, where ten is raised to that exponent value. That is a concentration of 7.94
X 10^-8. Similarly, pH 7.2 converts to 6.30 X 10^-8. Therefore, a pH of 7.1 is an
increase in hydronium ion concentration of 26% over that of pH 7.2.I hope that helps.
Lar
-
"Larry Hoover" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
"xyz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Which has the higher Ph, the greater alkalinizing effect, baking soda
or dolomite/limestone? If you have an answer for that, could you
explain in a few sentences,also, the difference between a Ph of,say,
7.1 and 7.2. It is not merely a difference of 1.4%, but an
exponential difference, right? Thanks.Limestone (assume calcium/magnesium carbonate) has a greater ability to take up
protons, i.e. to follow the following reaction:CO3(2-) + H3O(+) --> HCO3(-) + H2O (Calcium is not a participant in this reaction,
nor is magnesium from magnesium carbonate.)The carbonate anion is converted to bicarbonate anion at the expense of one
hydronium (H30+) cation. So, after carbonate reacts with an acidic hydronium, you
end up with bicarbonate and water. Bicarbonate can take up a proton in a similar
reaction, so on a molecule per molecule basis, carbonate has twice the alkalinizing
effect of bicarbonate.
How many molecules of carbonate exist in 5 grams of dolomite and how
many molecules of bicarbonate exist in 5 grams of baking soda?
Haven't pH values already been calculated for baking soda and
dolomite? [I've always thought the former was more base, more
alkalinizing. If you mix baking soda with ascorbic acid, you get
fizzing. Mixing dolomite with ascorbic acid produces no apparent
fizzing.] In blood chemistry (if there is where
you're going withQuoted message said:
this),
[yes]
the bicarbonate concentration vastly exceeds that of carbonate, and
thusQuoted message said:
provides a pH buffering effect. The other controlling variable is CO2 concentration.
I read somewhere that hospitalized burn victims need to
manage/restrict their carbohydrate intake due to acidosis issues
surrounding CO2 build-up and the impaired ability of the patient to
expire those gases.Quoted message said:
pH (note the little p, big H), is a symbolic notation. Little p means "minus log
of". H, in this context, means "concentration of hydronium ion". Hydrogen or Hydronium?So, to convert pH 7.1 to an actual concentration, you determine the value of 10
^ -7.1, where ten is raised to that exponent value. 10 raised to the -7.1 power comes out to a far greater number than 7.94, no? That is a concentration of 7.94
X 10^-8. Similarly, pH 7.2 converts to 6.30 X 10^-8. Therefore, a pH of 7.1 is an
increase in hydronium ion concentration of 26% over that of pH 7.2.
I was under the impression that a .1 difference represented a 10?- to
100-fold influence on pH. You're saying the difference between 7.1
and 7.2 is 26%?Quoted message said:
I hope that helps.
What did mankind do before the invention of the Solvay Process and
the resulting creation of bicarbonate of soda. Fortunately, they
didn't have to contend with modern pizza!Quoted message said:
Lar -
"xyz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Larry Hoover" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
"xyz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Which has the higher Ph, the greater alkalinizing effect, baking soda
or dolomite/limestone? If you have an answer for that, could you
explain in a few sentences,also, the difference between a Ph of,say,
7.1 and 7.2. It is not merely a difference of 1.4%, but an
exponential difference, right? Thanks.Limestone (assume calcium/magnesium carbonate) has a greater ability to take up
protons, i.e. to follow the following reaction:CO3(2-) + H3O(+) --> HCO3(-) + H2O (Calcium is not a participant in this
reaction,
nor is magnesium from magnesium carbonate.)The carbonate anion is converted to bicarbonate anion at the expense of one
hydronium (H30+) cation. So, after carbonate reacts with an acidic hydronium, you
end up with bicarbonate and water. Bicarbonate can take up a proton in a similar
reaction, so on a molecule per molecule basis, carbonate has twice the
alkalinizing
effect of bicarbonate.Quoted message said:
How many molecules of carbonate exist in 5 grams of dolomite and how
many molecules of bicarbonate exist in 5 grams of baking soda?I'll simply say that bicarbonate is at a higher concentration in sodium bicarbonate
than carbonate is in dolomite. I don't think the exact number of molecules is really
important.Quoted message said:
Haven't pH values already been calculated for baking soda and
dolomite? [I've always thought the former was more base, more
alkalinizing. If you mix baking soda with ascorbic acid, you get
fizzing. Mixing dolomite with ascorbic acid produces no apparent
fizzing.]That's due to solubility. Dolomite is not readily soluble in water, or weak acids.
In the stomach, HCl is the acid. Even in that acid, though, dolomite is not fully
dissolved, unless it is reduced to a very fine powder slurry before ingestion.
Dolomite is pretty stable, or it would have washed away in nature, rather than
accumulating.Sodium bicarbonate is readily soluble. That makes it more reactive with hydronium
cations, even those produced by a weak organic acid.What happens in the stomach ought to be kept distinct from what happens in the
blood.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
In blood chemistry (if there is where
you're going withQuoted message said:
this),
[yes]
the bicarbonate concentration vastly exceeds that of carbonate, and
thusQuoted message said:
provides a pH buffering effect. The other controlling variable is CO2
concentration.
I read somewhere that hospitalized burn victims need to
manage/restrict their carbohydrate intake due to acidosis issues
surrounding CO2 build-up and the impaired ability of the patient to
expire those gases.That's a very special case, and I think you're talking about the effect of burns
inside the lungs, i.e. inhalation injury.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
pH (note the little p, big H), is a symbolic notation. Little p means "minus log
of". H, in this context, means "concentration of hydronium ion". Hydrogen or
Hydronium?So, to convert pH 7.1 to an actual concentration, you determine the value of 10
^ -7.1, where ten is raised to that exponent value. 10 raised to the -7.1 power
comes out to a far greater number than 7.94, no? That is a concentration of 7.94
X 10^-8. Similarly, pH 7.2 converts to 6.30 X 10^-8. Therefore, a pH of 7.1 is an
increase in hydronium ion concentration of 26% over that of pH 7.2.Quoted message said:
I was under the impression that a .1 difference represented a 10?- to
100-fold influence on pH. You're saying the difference between 7.1
and 7.2 is 26%?Check it with a calculator.
By definition, because pH is based on a log-base 10 scale, each increment in the
number coming before the decimal place represents a 10-fold change in concentration.
A pH of 6.0 is exactly 10 times more concentrated than a pH of 7.0. A ph of 6.1 is
exactly 10 times more concentrated than a pH of 7.1. That's 1000 %.As another example, comparing pH 7.8 to pH 7.9. The former is 10^-7.8, or 1.59 X
10-8 molar in hydronium ions. The latter is 1.26 X 10^-8. A pH of 7.8 is an increase
in hydronium ion concentration of 26% over that of pH 7.9. That's the beauty of
logarithms.In the first example I gave earlier, the absolute increase (found by subtraction)
in hydronium ion concentration was 1. 64 X 10^-8. In the second example, the
increase was 0.33 X 10^-8 molar. That's the confusing part of logarithms.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I hope that helps.
What did mankind do before the invention of the Solvay Process and
the resulting creation of bicarbonate of soda. Fortunately, they
didn't have to contend with modern pizza!Quoted message said:
LarI really don't know where you're going with the pizza idea.
Lar
-
Larry Hoover said:
"xyz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Larry Hoover" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
"xyz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Which has the higher Ph, the greater alkalinizing effect, baking
sodaQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> or dolomite/limestone? If you have an answer for that, could
youQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> explain in a few sentences,also, the difference between a Ph
of,say,Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> 7.1 and 7.2. It is not merely a difference of 1.4%, but an
> exponential difference, right? Thanks.Limestone (assume calcium/magnesium carbonate) has a greater
ability to take upQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
protons, i.e. to follow the following reaction:
CO3(2-) + H3O(+) --> HCO3(-) + H2O (Calcium is not a participant
in thisQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
reaction,
nor is magnesium from magnesium carbonate.)The carbonate anion is converted to bicarbonate anion at the
expense of oneQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
hydronium (H30+) cation. So, after carbonate reacts with an acidic
hydronium, youQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
end up with bicarbonate and water. Bicarbonate can take up a
proton in a similarQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
reaction, so on a molecule per molecule basis, carbonate has twice
theQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
alkalinizing
effect of bicarbonate.Quoted message said:
How many molecules of carbonate exist in 5 grams of dolomite and
howQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
many molecules of bicarbonate exist in 5 grams of baking soda?
I'll simply say that bicarbonate is at a higher concentration in
sodium bicarbonateQuoted message said:
than carbonate is in dolomite. I don't think the exact number of
molecules is reallyQuoted message said:
important.
Quoted message said:
Haven't pH values already been calculated for baking soda and
dolomite? [I've always thought the former was more base, more
alkalinizing. If you mix baking soda with ascorbic acid, you get
fizzing. Mixing dolomite with ascorbic acid produces no apparent
fizzing.]That's due to solubility. Dolomite is not readily soluble in water,
or weak acids.Quoted message said:
In the stomach, HCl is the acid. Even in that acid, though, dolomite
is not fullyQuoted message said:
dissolved, unless it is reduced to a very fine powder slurry before
ingestion.Quoted message said:
Dolomite is pretty stable, or it would have washed away in nature,
rather thanQuoted message said:
accumulating.
Sodium bicarbonate is readily soluble. That makes it more reactive
with hydroniumQuoted message said:
cations, even those produced by a weak organic acid.
What happens in the stomach ought to be kept distinct from what
happens in theQuoted message said:
blood.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
In blood chemistry (if there is where
you're going withQuoted message said:
this),
[yes]
the bicarbonate concentration vastly exceeds that of carbonate, and
thusQuoted message said:
provides a pH buffering effect. The other controlling variable is
CO2Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
concentration.
I read somewhere that hospitalized burn victims need to
manage/restrict their carbohydrate intake due to acidosis issues
surrounding CO2 build-up and the impaired ability of the patient to
expire those gases.That's a very special case, and I think you're talking about the
effect of burnsQuoted message said:
inside the lungs, i.e. inhalation injury.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
pH (note the little p, big H), is a symbolic notation. Little p
means "minus logQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
of". H, in this context, means "concentration of hydronium ion".
Hydrogen orQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Hydronium?
So, to convert pH 7.1 to an actual concentration, you determine
the value of 10Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
^ -7.1, where ten is raised to that exponent value. 10 raised to
the -7.1 powerQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
comes out to a far greater number than 7.94, no? That is a
concentration of 7.94Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
X 10^-8. Similarly, pH 7.2 converts to 6.30 X 10^-8. Therefore, a
pH of 7.1 is anQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
increase in hydronium ion concentration of 26% over that of pH
7.2.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I was under the impression that a .1 difference represented a 10?-
toQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
100-fold influence on pH. You're saying the difference between 7.1
and 7.2 is 26%?Check it with a calculator.
By definition, because pH is based on a log-base 10 scale, each
increment in theQuoted message said:
number coming before the decimal place represents a 10-fold change in
concentration.Quoted message said:
A pH of 6.0 is exactly 10 times more concentrated than a pH of 7.0. A
ph of 6.1 isQuoted message said:
exactly 10 times more concentrated than a pH of 7.1. That's 1000 %.
As another example, comparing pH 7.8 to pH 7.9. The former is
10^-7.8, or 1.59 XQuoted message said:
10-8 molar in hydronium ions. The latter is 1.26 X 10^-8. A pH of 7.8
is an increaseQuoted message said:
in hydronium ion concentration of 26% over that of pH 7.9. That's
the beauty ofQuoted message said:
logarithms.
In the first example I gave earlier, the absolute increase (found by
subtraction)Quoted message said:
in hydronium ion concentration was 1. 64 X 10^-8. In the second
example, theQuoted message said:
increase was 0.33 X 10^-8 molar. That's the confusing part of
logarithms.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I hope that helps.
What did mankind do before the invention of the Solvay Process and
the resulting creation of bicarbonate of soda. Fortunately, they
didn't have to contend with modern pizza!Quoted message said:
LarI really don't know where you're going with the pizza idea.
Things that cause dyspepsia. Or how was Renal Acid Load maintained in
ancient Rome, for instance. I presume they ate a more balanced diet.
More vegetables. Non-chlorinated drinking water. Limestone is not in
short supply in Western Europe. Thanks for your reply. It was
helpful.Quoted message said:
Lar -
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Larry Hoover said:
I really don't know where you're going with the pizza idea.
Quoted message said:
Things that cause dyspepsia. Or how was Renal Acid Load maintained in
ancient Rome, for instance.The kidneys are pretty good at sorting that out, all by themselves.
Quoted message said:
I presume they ate a more balanced diet.
More vegetables. Non-chlorinated drinking water. Limestone is not in
short supply in Western Europe. Thanks for your reply. It was
helpful.I'm still not sure where you're trying to take this discussion, but you might be
interested in these two links:http://www.basica.de/english/downloads/PRAL-NMT_Basica_engl.pdf
http://www.mgwater.com/estend.shtml
Lar
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.