"JD" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Feb 11, 1:15 am, "Micheal Artindale" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:"Gman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:I've been running Pearl Izumis for a while, but I'd like to
go baggy.
Why do you want to go baggie? Before i got proper cycling shorts, I wore
regular clothing.
What the hell do you mean "proper cycling shorts"? Proper for what?
Do you ever crash? Do your "proper cycling shorts" survive a crash
without getting holes in them? Do those nasty grabby branches ever
tear holes in you "proper cycling shorts"? Or are you just some
barney who plods along doubletracks and thinks that's what it's all
about?
Of course Greg will not listen to this doof's lame "arguments". I
know more than a few mountain bikers who ride baggy shorts because
they are tougher than "proper cycling shorts".
JD
Proper means something designed for cycling, not for other things. They have
the Chamois in it.
As far as spills and other bike crashes, I usually avoid them, I have
scatched myself up badly sometimes. I have never torn my shorts, I have many
rips and holes in other clothes that have been worn trail riding.
Personally I hate double track, its not what mountain biking is about. Mind
you, I do think that some trail builders go a little overboard for some
trails.
Does this clear up the mud?
Micheal
Quoted message said: