Have a look through the rest of Kunstler's site too -- it's really a hoot.
Can I ask why you think California has "good" bike lanes? I live here, and there are definitely bike lanes, but their quality is all over the map. I have examples of both, but no photos right now.
Have a look through the rest of Kunstler's site too -- it's really a hoot.
Can I ask why you think California has "good" bike lanes? I live here, and there are definitely bike lanes, but their quality is all over the map. I have examples of both, but no photos right now.
Indeed they have both. Most places only have the bad ones. The difference is often having wider roads to begin with.
Have a look through the rest of Kunstler's site too -- it's really a hoot.
Can I ask why you think California has "good" bike lanes? I live here, and there are definitely bike lanes, but their quality is all over the map. I have examples of both, but no photos right now.
Indeed they have both. Most places only have the bad ones. The difference is often having wider roads to begin with.
Aye. I think wider roadways (not always available in California) have more to do with bicycle safety than bike lanes.
I can't even imagine riding in a bike lane like that. It is so ridiculous, it is funny. I am still uncomfortable riding in the street. I try to stay on the sidewalk until I get to the park. I know that is illegal....but I will gain confidence eventually. I am lucky I live in a little sissy little suburban town where we have so many parks with fabulous paths. It is a good place to ride. I am still in awe of those of you who ride through major cities. This weekend I am going to a party and a friend of my friend is a Bike messenger in NYC. I have never met him or spoke with him but now that I am riding and reading this newsgroup I am very eager to speak with him about his job. He must have some wonderful stories about NYC, bicycles, and traffic. I can't wait. He is a young man in his 20's and delivers around the Wall Street area. I bet he will have some wonderful adventures to tell. As for me, my sissy parks in my little town are fine for now. ;-) Sometimes I wonder if things would have been different if my parents had not moved me out of a city environment when I was little and moved me to this sheltered little town. Maybe I would have been a little tougher. But most of the kids I grew up with in Newark are in prison, so maybe it was a good move. Maggie.
Aye. I think wider roadways (not always available in California)
have more
Quoted message said:
to do with bicycle safety than bike lanes.
It's been said that the only place you can put bike lanes is where the road is wide enough not to need them. However, that ignores the fact that cars hit bikes where their paths intersect, i.e. at intersections.
Here in London UK the most common kind of bike fatality is caused by a left turning truck - we drive on the left here - with a bike getting between the truck and the curb. It doesn't help that trucks sometimes have to pull away from the curb to give themselves clearance to get round. Anything that encourages novices to get on the inside of those trucks can't be good.
The most common serious accident is dooring. I don't think lanes help there either.
Have a look through the rest of Kunstler's site too -- it's really a hoot.
Matt O.
This is VERY common in San Diego. I don't live there anymore, but since a lot of storm drains were of this vertical grid type that are 18" - 24" extending into the street, you just gotta look out for them. Certainly no city planner who commutes to work 1.287 hours per day each way from his bedroom community in his .87 ton vehicle is going to think of it.
Oh, and in Orange County some cities have 12 inch bike lanes, including the 6" curb base. Real nice.