B Results on Saturday

"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

have a large shot of testosterone to test at the 11:1 reported. No patch
would have had that effect. Do you really believe that he is too stupid to

Where did you read that he admitted using a patch that did not have the
desired affect?

In article
<[email hidden]>,

Dumbass said:

Actually, someone pointed out that the lab could set the schedule after
the 5 day period where Landis could make a request. The UCI might have
jumped the gun by a few hours, but basically Landis time had run out
so the 10 day window for scheduling the test was starting. The UCI can
do the test with or without Landis' request if they want to.

I have not read the rules. I thought that the B sample
could not be unsealed without the athlete or a
representative present.

--
Michael Press

Michael Press said:

In article
<[email hidden]>,

Dumbass said:

Actually, someone pointed out that the lab could set the schedule after
the 5 day period where Landis could make a request. The UCI might have
jumped the gun by a few hours, but basically Landis time had run out
so the 10 day window for scheduling the test was starting. The UCI can
do the test with or without Landis' request if they want to.

I have not read the rules. I thought that the B sample
could not be unsealed without the athlete or a
representative present.

Actually, there is a note after Article 90 that says that the failure
of any party to have an observer does not invalidate the test.

Quoted message said:

--
Michael Press

Dumbass said:

Michael Press said:

In article
<[email hidden]>,

Dumbass said:

Actually, someone pointed out that the lab could set the schedule after
the 5 day period where Landis could make a request. The UCI might have
jumped the gun by a few hours, but basically Landis time had run out
so the 10 day window for scheduling the test was starting. The UCI can
do the test with or without Landis' request if they want to.

I have not read the rules. I thought that the B sample
could not be unsealed without the athlete or a
representative present.

Actually, there is a note after Article 90 that says that the failure
of any party to have an observer does not invalidate the test.

Opps after article 86. Here are the regs:

http://www.uci.ch/english/about/rules_2004/ch14.pdf

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

--
Michael Press

"Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

in message <[email hidden]>, Tom

He was drinking water all day. I don't know whether drinking flushes
testosterone out of your system, but you'd certainly expect it to dilute
your urine.

Well, it flushes everything out of your body that is water soluable. That
means that there was a huge amount of other components in there beside
testosterone even if that wasn't being washed out as well.

Quoted message said:

What it wouldn't do is change the /ratio/ in your urine, and
as it is the ratio they're testing for, how much he drank is essentially
irrelevant.

No it isn't. Because the test results can easily be poluted with any other
molecule of the same approximate mass.