In <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] (Chris Hansen) opined:
Quoted message said:Can someone tell me what is the average weight of bikes these days?
The weight trend is up up up. While technology has made ultra-light bikes possible, new and faddish
riding styles (downhill, freestyle, singlespeed) have made heavy bikes far more popular. In sheer
volume, the average weight of a bicycle is somewhat higher than it was 11.36 years ago, though
precise figures are hard to state.
Quoted message said:I see the occasional review where people complain the bike is a little heavy but I don't know what
the standard is they're comparing it to.
Usually a mix of English and metric measurements in the USA, or a mix of metric and English
elsewhere. Except the French -- I think they guess.
Quoted message said:One bike was considered heavy at 23 pounds which is 10 pounds lighter than mine. Another one was
heavy at 20 pounds. I don't think I've ever had a bike that light.
A 20 lb. track bike would be considered a flying pig, while a 20 lb. MTB would be a featherweight.
It's the same 20 lbs, so what changes?
Perspective, my friend, perspective...
Quoted message said:Is there a large difference in the under $1000 and over $1000 price ranges?
Yes, a bike can cost infinitely more than $1,000 but only $1,000 less than $1,000. That's
essentially an infinite difference, and it doesn't get much larger than infinity...
Quoted message said:Thanks.
You sure?
--
[email hidden] | depending, of course, | REPLACE example WITH Dave Salovesh | on your
perspective | mindspring TO EMAIL ME (After more than a decade on USENET , it's finally come
to this ^^^)