davie_gillie said:I am new to cycling, and have been looking for reviews regarding Avanti Road Bikes. I cannot find any for the lower price ranges. I was interested in beginning road cycling but was wondering how the Avanti's compare. I was looking to spend around $1700 (already +$300 than intended) and the 06 Avanti Giro, caught my eye. For this sort of price range, does anyone know of a better value bike out there. I heard that the paint job on Avantis is really poor, is this true?
Thanks
I think you can do better for an entry level road bike than the Avanti Giro. My first road bike was a Giro 2003. It does the job, but it's a pretty heavy bike! Mine had a triple chainring, Alu frame (only carbon front forks), Tiagra cranks, 105 componentry, and really bad Shimano SPD-R pedals (they're very unpopular now, and i hope they will disappear from the market).
I think Giant bikes are great value for money if you're not too worried about riding a 'common' brand. I ride a Giant TCR now and i can't fault it. They spend a fair bit of money on designing their bikes, and sponsor Team Mobile so they get feedback from the pro cyclists.
The only things that I liked about my Avanti Giro were:
- surprisingly comfortable - for an Alu frame bike, the Giro is a pretty smooth ride. Even on a cheese-grater type of knobbly asphalt that we have in Kew Blvd, Melb. Maybe it's the carbon fork which should claim credit for that.
- saddle-- the Specialized Comp saddle is relatively heavy (310g) and is a 'fitness' cyclist type of saddle, but goddam I love it. I have put it on my Giant for racing and training, and it's the only one that won't get me sore. Specialized make good saddles, especially now that they make all their saddles in three different widths. But saddles are a personal thing, you just have to get lucky with your first bike.
- wheels-- my Giro in 2003 came with Shimano WH-540 wheels. They're pretty light, not as fast as the Mavic Ksyriums that i have now, but for an entry level road bike they were excellent. I still think highly of them now.
- triple chainring-- handy to start training with, because you're highly unlikely, in fact it'd be close to impossible, to overload your muscles climbing ANY hill with a triple chainring. You'll get the small gears to spin up the steepest hills if you're not confident to get out of the saddle or push a bigger gear.
- for under $2000, the Giro was the bike with the best specs that i could find (within about 3 weeks of hunting... i wanted a road bike ASAP at the time!! in 2003 the Giants under $2000 were ugly... in 2005, the Giants were just ugly full stop. no idea what 2006 is like)
The downsides to the Giro are:
- weight-- i got a 48cm frame (small). for such a little bike it weighed about 11kg (without water bottles).
- the triple chainring-- if you're riding mainly on flat road, with rolling hills, you definitely won't need a triple chainring. That extra ring adds to the weight.
- the small frame fits one big water bottle (750ml), and can only fit a small 600ml bottle in the other spot (i think the frame is a compact design. if so, i have heard that descending on compact frames provide less stability. on the upside, compact frames flex less so feel more responsive)
good luck and happy shopping