General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Atkins report #4

Started by Martin W. Smith · · Last activity · 12 posts · 1,001 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
15 September 2003
Last activity
16 September 2003
Original author
Martin W. Smith
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,001
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have decided to put my stake in the sand and declare that I have reached my goal weight. I have
    been as low as 85.5 kilos, which is a loss of 12 kilos, and I seem to be "wanting" to stay in the
    86.5 to 87.5 kilo range, which is a loss of 10+ kilos, which was my original goal. At least three
    people have commented that I appear to have lost too much weight, which might be true, given that
    when I look at myself in the mirror, naked, I look very thin. Given my hopefully standard level of
    vanity, the fact that even I think I am a bit too thin probably indicates I should stop trying to
    lose weight.

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos. One (supposed)
    MD on the low-carb diet newsgroup said I should be at 20!. When I replied that at 74 inches cm I
    would have to weigh 156 lbs to have a BMI of 20, and that I haven't weighed 156 lbs since before my
    growth spurt as a teenager, the doctor said that 20 is still what he would recommend. So I guess you
    can't really trust advice you get on the internet after all.

    I have not yet remeasured my body fat percent. The one time I did measure it using the electrical
    impedence method, it registered 19%, which I think is too high. But the electronic impedance method
    is dependent on the body's state of hydration, so I will wait until I can buy my own body fat scale
    to resume BF measurements. I would like to get it down to 15% or so, but I don't see a lot of fat,
    so if I really am at 19%, maybe I will have to stay there.

    Officially, I am now in the Pre-mantenance phase of the Atkins diet, which is a phase in which you
    are no longer trying to lose weight. Rather, you are adding carbs back into your diet, 10 grams of
    daily carbs per week, until you reach a total carb weight at which you no longer lose weight. Well,
    I haven't been that precise about following the rules in either of the first two phases, and I don't
    plan to measure carbs to that level of accuracy. I will eyeball it as I have been doing. I plan to
    add some fruit (maybe a second banana and one or two apples, etc), some higher gi cereal (maybe some
    granola instead of All Bran Plus), and a weekly sushi dinner (rice). I plan to reduce fat a little
    by reducing cheese and red meat. I will also probably drink more fruit juice (unsweetened) and
    sample the occasional chocolate chip cookie.

    We'll see how that goes. If it goes well, then I might try an experiment in which I switch to the
    Pritikin diet for at least part of the Autumn, which is when I would still be on that diet naturally
    anyway, if I were a hunter-gatherer.

    I have increased my total amount of exercise per week, because my fitness club has just begun its
    fall class schedule, and they have increased the number babe-fest aerobics classes. I am doing two
    one-hour aerobics or spinners classes of fairly high intensity four days per week now, in addition
    to my 1500m swim each weekday morning. Some days I do a longer swim session with another guy who
    swims an actual workout. He's a lot faster than I am, but he adjusts his intervals to suit me. So I
    suppose I am doing 12 to 15 hours of high quality exercise per week, which is a bit over the top,
    but I enjoy it. I think the Atkins diet is better attempted in conjunction with a vigorous exercise
    regiment, and the book recommends it be done that way.

    martin

    --
    Draft Wesley Clark for President! www.DraftWesleyClark.com

    Martin Smith email: [email hidden]

  2. Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181 lbs)
    and my fat is about 12-14%

  3. BMI has ZERO value for individuals.

    What is your BF%?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "I measure success by the degree to which I ruin other people's lives."

  4. Helgi Briem said:
    Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181 lbs)
    and my fat is about 12-14%

    Not only are they ridiculous for an athlete, BMI is not considered accurate for very muscular
    people, who will always seem to weigh more than they "should."

    Helgi--you know men seem to think all women should weigh 125 pounds or less, no matter what their
    height. However, I seem to remember that Gabrielle Reese sometimes weighed 175 for her bikini shots.

    Madelaine

  5. "Helgi Briem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181 lbs)
    and my fat is about 12-14%


    yeap, very true. It's the lean mass vs. the fat mass that counts, along with bone density and water
    retention figures. I like the test my weight doctor does periodically, it gives you all of those
    figures. You get to figure out how may pounds of water your'e retaining, how much fat you have, how
    much lean body mass, another 3 or 4 figures. I don't recall off the top of my head what they are. I
    usually focus on the first three, fat, lean mass and water.

  6. Madelaine said:
    Helgi Briem said:
    Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181 lbs)
    and my fat is about 12-14%


    Not only are they ridiculous for an athlete, BMI is not considered accurate for very muscular
    people, who will always seem to weigh more than they "should."

    Well, I'm not "very muscular" although I am fairly fit and used to be extremely fit. More muscular
    than average perhaps. When I say "athlete" I basically mean someone who works out a bit. Although
    long-distance runners seem to burn away any muscle they might have had. Ridiculous waste to my mind.

    Quoted message said:

    Helgi--you know men seem to think all women should weigh 125 pounds or less, no matter what
    their height. However, I seem to remember that Gabrielle Reese sometimes weighed 175 for her
    bikini shots.

    I don't know who she is and she doesn't look familiar if I look for her pictures on the web. She
    looks athletic.

    I certainly know many beautifully built women who weigh 160 lbs plus.

  7. "Madelaine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Helgi Briem said:
    Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181
    lbs) and my fat is about 12-14%

    Not only are they ridiculous for an athlete, BMI is not considered accurate for very muscular
    people, who will always seem to weigh more than they "should."

    Helgi--you know men seem to think all women should weigh 125 pounds or less, no matter what
    their height. However, I seem to remember that Gabrielle Reese sometimes weighed 175 for her
    bikini shots.

    Madelaine

    My boyfriend is 6-1 and 240 pounds, bench presses over 300 pounds and has not even 10% body fat. His
    BMI puts him close to the 'obese' segment. HA!

  8. "Madelaine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Helgi Briem said:
    Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181
    lbs) and my fat is about 12-14%

    Not only are they ridiculous for an athlete, BMI is not considered accurate for very muscular
    people, who will always seem to weigh more than they "should."

    Helgi--you know men seem to think all women should weigh 125 pounds or less, no matter what
    their height. However, I seem to remember that Gabrielle Reese sometimes weighed 175 for her
    bikini shots.

    Madelaine

    At 5'-9" when I'm in a really good shape, I can weigh 150lb, have 14% body fat and wear a size 2-4
    I've also been at 140lb with 29% body fat, and need a size 6.

  9. DaKitty said:

    "Helgi Briem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181 lbs)
    and my fat is about 12-14%

    yeap, very true. It's the lean mass vs. the fat mass that counts, along with bone density and
    water retention figures. I like the test my weight doctor does periodically, it gives you all of
    those figures. You get to figure out how may pounds of water your'e retaining, how much fat you
    have, how much lean body mass, another 3 or 4 figures. I don't recall off the top of my head what
    they are. I usually focus on the first three, fat, lean mass and water.

    Is this one test, or several different tests with the data taken together?

  10. "Madelaine" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    DaKitty said:

    "Helgi Briem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:54:39 +0200, "Martin W. Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    >range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181
    lbs) and my fat is about 12-14%

    yeap, very true. It's the lean mass vs. the fat mass that counts, along with bone density


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    water retention figures. I like the test my weight doctor does periodically, it gives you all of
    those figures. You get to figure out how may pounds of water your'e retaining, how much


    fat

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    you have, how much lean body mass, another 3 or 4 figures. I don't


    recall

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off the top of my head what they are. I usually focus on the first three, fat, lean mass and
    water.

    Is this one test, or several different tests with the data taken together?


    My doc has some snazzy high end gadget, it's like an electronic scale, you step on it with bare feet
    (like you would on a regular body fat analyzing scale), then he puts little clamps on your fingers
    (almost like pulse monitors)... I forget exactly how it goes, couple more electrodes or something...
    then keys in your height, and bzzt... takes it's measurements and makes a printout. I suspect it'
    ultrasounds based, but there may be more to it. I'll pay more attention to what it is when I'm there
    next time. It's big, looks like a hospital piece of equipment. Nothing like the body fat analyzers I
    saw at a gym, even the high end ones.

    One day we were joking.. that I should have gone to the bathroom (pee) before he made the
    measurements. He said, go ahead, then I'll take another one, and compare the results... and I'll be
    darn, it picked up on the difference.

  11. "Kobe AnyHoleWillDo Bryant" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    BMI has ZERO value for individuals.

    What is your BF%?

    I'm not sure if it's me you're asking... from the way the thread is laid out seems like you
    might be..

    My BF has relatively low body fat%, I'm gonna guess in high teens.. He hasn't checked it in a long
    time, several years. Like most guys in their 40's, he's little bit soft in the mid section, but the
    rest of him, arms, legs, back chest... is pretty ripped. So it couldn't be much. He was actually
    bragging few months ago, he saw in some magazine Evender Hollifield's measurements, arms, legs chest
    waist etc... and his are almost the same.

  12. "Helgi Briem" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Martin W. Smith said:

    Still, my BMI is 24.6-24.8, which is in the normal range near the top but well above the ideal
    range, according to the BMI page, which says I should be at 22 and weight 82 kilos.

    These figures are ridiculous for an athlete. I have a BMI of 25.3 (180cm, 82kg or 5'11", 181 lbs)
    and my fat is about 12-14%


    Yep, I consider the BMI totally useless because it doesn't distingush what the source of the body
    mass is. Look at the stats for NHL hockey players who are 5'11". Usually they're around 190 lbs. And
    hockey players are known for having a low percentage of body fat.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.