Interesting roundtable on Comcast Net Sports (CSNDC) last night.
----------
Sports and Steroids: Performance Enhancing Drugs in School
Comcast SportsNet Mid-Atlantic Jun 11 09:00pm
Special/Sports, 60 Mins.
Middle- and high-school student athletes and coaches participate in a town
hall meeting on the dangers of using steroids.
Original Airdate: June 2, 2005.
---------
One of the panelists asked a former top level athlete (paraphrasing):
'If a multi-million dollar earning athlete wants to take steroids,
can he acquire steroids (or PEDs (Performance Enhancing Drugs)) and stay
ahead of the testing curve?'
Without hesitation, the former athlete (who -obviously- had taken high-dose
steroids, and was still taking them) said emphatically: 'Oh, yes'.
He went on to say how this was 'big business' and that top athletes in pro
sports are earning multi year contracts in excess of $150million USD. Uh,
he didn't explain -how- they stayed ahead of the curve.
I've got a rather long discussion of the various ways they might beat the
testing. I could summarize later, or post it if anyone is interested.
Just one comment and that's to say there are many ways to 'test clean'. As
most know it's reported that pro-cyclists have their samples frozen and
stored and LA has said that he knows this and knows that at anytime in the
future they can thaw his sample and retest it with any new technologies, or
(implying) for any drugs not yet made public. He doesn't seem worried.
If you presume the top ten riders in every race have their samples stored,
and there are quite a lot of races each season, it rapidly becomes an
escalating problem to store all of these samples. Who knows how long they
store them - but presumably it's 5 years. Heh, I doubt if anyone throws
away LA's samples, but according to lab protocol the samples do not have
athlete's names on them, so the guy cleaning out the fridge wouldn't know
which ones to save, lol.
jj