I shamelessly took this from the CC forum. The originator of the thread thought it deserved to be on its own, of which that person is correct. Of course, the thread is turning into another character assassination thread due to the cowardly comments of Guest.
Although I find it interesting, I have no comments at the moment.
"QUOTE
Rumor has it that there may be a new ADM comming out in the future to be mor current with the direction and focus of the CCA. Anyone else heard this rumor.
It's more than a rumour.
A number of years ago, Istvan Balyi, resident sport scientist with Pacific Sport in Victoria, created "AIM" for Alpine Ski Canada (Athlete Integrated Model). It was leaps ahead of the old pyramid model used for so many years. AIM included skills and physiological reference points at different ages, training and competition volumes and a whole lot of other stuff specific to developing ski racers. He also coined some new phrases to describe different levels of development:
FUNdamentals
Learning to Train
Training to Train
Training to Compete
Training to Win
A number of national sport organizations adopted AIM's jargon but did not do any fundamental research into age-specific optimal skill aquisition, training loads, degree of specialization, etc.
More recently, the Coaching Association of Canada had required sport organizations to develop new Participant Development Models as part of the move to a new NCCP. Again, some sports ignored the research (or didn't have the capacity to conduct it) and simply rolled the old into a new format.
Even more recently, Sport Canada decided to invest in proper athlete development models for each sport.
Istvan Balyi's work remains the template, but now NSOs can hire researchers to help create the sport-specifc body of knowledge that is fundamental to a functional, easy to understand athlete development model.
I'm 95% certain that CCA is one of the sports that has started work on its model. Perhaps Lister or someone else can add to this.
Andy "