Road Cycling · Public discussion

Athens Twighlight Crit Grid Qualifier question...

Started by steevo · · Last activity · 23 posts · 1,132 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
26 April 2008
Last activity
30 April 2008
Original author
steevo
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,132
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I just did the grid qualifier at athens twighlight, and I used my
    powertap so I could have the powerfile for my records. However, the
    whole time during the qualifier there was a 30-40 watt difference
    between my powertap (which was definitely zeroed) and the computrainer
    readout. When I was riding the qualifier, I noticed that there was a
    side to side rocking motion, more than I've ever felt on any trainer.
    Does anyone have any explanation for this? The recorded avg. watts was
    355 for 8:16, but my powertap recorded 393. The powertap data was
    definitely correct.

  2. steevo said:

    I just did the grid qualifier at athens twighlight, and I used my
    powertap so I could have the powerfile for my records. However, the
    whole time during the qualifier there was a 30-40 watt difference
    between my powertap (which was definitely zeroed) and the computrainer
    readout. When I was riding the qualifier, I noticed that there was a
    side to side rocking motion, more than I've ever felt on any trainer.
    Does anyone have any explanation for this? The recorded avg. watts was
    355 for 8:16, but my powertap recorded 393. The powertap data was
    definitely correct.

    You are a Fred.


  3. Quoted message said:

    You are a Fred.

    I'm guessing he's referring to doing the qualifier to get a start
    position for the Athens Twilight crit. That would be anti-fredly.

  4. steevo said:

    I just did the grid qualifier at athens twighlight, and I used my
    powertap so I could have the powerfile for my records. However, the
    whole time during the qualifier there was a 30-40 watt difference
    between my powertap (which was definitely zeroed) and the computrainer
    readout. When I was riding the qualifier, I noticed that there was a
    side to side rocking motion, more than I've ever felt on any trainer.
    Does anyone have any explanation for this? The recorded avg. watts was
    355 for 8:16, but my powertap recorded 393. The powertap data was
    definitely correct.

    you lost 38 watts between the hub and tire.

  5. Quoted post said:
    Quoted message said:

    You are a Fred.

    I'm guessing he's referring to doing the qualifier to get a start
    position for the Athens Twilight crit.  That would be anti-fredly.

    Dumbass -

    Fredliness has nothing to do w/ ability.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  6. steevo said:
    Quoted message said:

    I just did the grid qualifier at athens twighlight, and I used my
    powertap so I could have the powerfile for my records. However, the
    whole time during the qualifier there was a 30-40 watt difference
    between my powertap (which was definitely zeroed) and the computrainer
    readout. When I was riding the qualifier, I noticed that there was a
    side to side rocking motion, more than I've ever felt on any trainer.
    Does anyone have any explanation for this? The recorded avg. watts was
    355 for 8:16, but my powertap recorded 393. The powertap data was
    definitely correct.

    Amit Ghosh said:

    you lost 38 watts between the hub and tire.

    Try riding with a 3.2kg wheel.

  7. Kurgan Gringioni said:

    You are a Fred.

    Fredburger has copyrighted the Fred trademark. Please refer to him
    as Fred(tm).


  8. Quoted message said:

    Dumbass -

    Fredliness has nothing to do w/ ability.

    ok, I will concede that point. Like today ... racing with some very
    good riders who insist on wearing those socks that seems to go as high
    as my grandfather's support hose.

    .... but having the balls to line up at Athens does offset quite a lot
    of fredliness in my book.

  9. On Apr 26, 10:15 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Dumbass -

    Quoted message said:

    Fredliness has nothing to do w/ ability.

    ok, I will concede that point.  Like today ... racing with some very
    good riders who insist on wearing those socks that seems to go as high
    as my grandfather's support hose.

    ... but having the balls to line up at Athens does offset quite a lot
    of fredliness in my book.

    I think somebody needs to come up with a comprehensive fredness rating
    system. I mean, how do things like helmet visors and baggy day-glow
    rain gear fit in?

    Joseph

  10. email hidden said:

    On Apr 26, 10:15 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Fredliness has nothing to do w/ ability.

    Quoted message said:

    ok, I will concede that point.  Like today ... racing with some very
    good riders who insist on wearing those socks that seems to go as high
    as my grandfather's support hose.

    Quoted message said:

    ... but having the balls to line up at Athens does offset quite a lot
    of fredliness in my book.

    I think somebody needs to come up with a comprehensive fredness rating
    system. I mean, how do things like helmet visors and baggy day-glow
    rain gear fit in?

    It depends. Maybe there is a cycling activity that requires
    helmet visors, or baggy day-glo vests, or Primal Wear jerseys.
    I can't think of one, but maybe the people with those jerseys
    know. The key point of fredliness is (in)appropriateness for
    the task at hand. RBR explains it:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/afd0e321f4181faa

    Ben
    I am now and have always been a Fred.

  11. steevo said:

    I just did the grid qualifier at athens twighlight, and I used my
    powertap so I could have the powerfile for my records. However, the
    whole time during the qualifier there was a 30-40 watt difference
    between my powertap (which was definitely zeroed) and the computrainer
    readout. When I was riding the qualifier, I noticed that there was a
    side to side rocking motion, more than I've ever felt on any trainer.
    Does anyone have any explanation for this? The recorded avg. watts was
    355 for 8:16, but my powertap recorded 393. The powertap data was
    definitely correct.

    Maybe it was rigged?

    But seriously, this compu-trainer qualifying-heat concept is weird. Do any
    other major races do this? It's kind of a flawed idea anyway... why is a 3
    km stationary-bike TT is a good measure of who should get into the crit, or
    where you should line up if you get in? Is it really just a side-show for
    crowd entertainment?

    Mark
    http://marcofanelli.blogspot.com

  12. Off The Back said:

    Maybe it was rigged?

    But seriously, this compu-trainer qualifying-heat concept is weird. Do any
    other major races do this? It's kind of a flawed idea anyway... why is a 3
    km stationary-bike TT is a good measure of who should get into the crit, or
    where you should line up if you get in? Is it really just a side-show for
    crowd entertainment?

    Mark http://marcofanelli.blogspot.com

    When I first read the post, I thought he was talking about
    doing the course on a compu-trainer, the way you can
    ride up Alpe d'Huez on a compu-trainer (as long as you
    put a block under the front wheel).

    Then I checked (yes, I occasionally fact-check my rbr posts)
    and found it was a real qualifying heat. I don't really get it
    either, but it's probably a good way to get some sponsorship
    from Compu-trainer and entertain some spectators in a
    perverse way. I want to see pictures of it on cyclingnews,
    at least.

    Here's my question for the OP: Do you have to pin on a
    number for a Computrainer heat?

    Ben

  13. On Apr 26, 3:45 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/afd0e321f4181faa

    Dumbass -

    Ahhh, the good old days.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  14. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted post said:
    Quoted message said:

    Dumbass -

    Fredliness has nothing to do w/ ability.

    ok, I will concede that point. Like today ... racing with some very
    good riders who insist on wearing those socks that seems to go as high
    as my grandfather's support hose.

    ... but having the balls to line up at Athens does offset quite a lot
    of fredliness in my book.

    Oh, dearie me. I am sure that I am putting out
    50 watts more than the dumb-[censored] computer says.

    --
    Michael Press

  15. I bet these boys didn't do any compu-trainer qualifying!

    Mark
    http://marcofanelli.blogspot.com

  16. Off The Back said:

    But seriously, this compu-trainer qualifying-heat concept is weird. Do any
    other major races do this? It's kind of a flawed idea anyway... why is a 3
    km stationary-bike TT is a good measure of who should get into the crit,
    or where you should line up if you get in? Is it really just a side-show
    for crowd entertainment?

    And it doesn't take power to weight ratio into account (unless they
    normalize for weight afterwards ?).

  17. Donald Munro said:
    Off The Back said:

    But seriously, this compu-trainer qualifying-heat concept is weird. Do any
    other major races do this? It's kind of a flawed idea anyway... why is a3
    km stationary-bike TT is a good measure of who should get into the crit,
    or where you should line up if you get in? Is it really just a side-show
    for crowd entertainment?

    And it doesn't take power to weight ratio into account (unless they
    normalize for weight afterwards ?).

    Reminds me of an episode of a "the biggest loser" type show I saw.
    (Yes I admit that I have watched portions of such drivel!) and there
    was one guy who was about 2.10m tall and weighed 300kg or so. He was
    monster big and strong in addition to being fat as hell. Anyway, one
    of the "challenges" was who could ride farthest on a stationary bike.
    He won, beating all of the miniature fat ladies. He was ecstatic. Duh.

    Joseph

  18. On Apr 27, 12:45 am, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    On Apr 26, 2:45 pm, "[email hidden]"

    Quoted message said:

    On Apr 26, 10:15 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Fredliness has nothing to do w/ ability.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ok, I will concede that point.  Like today ... racing with some very
    good riders who insist on wearing those socks that seems to go as high
    as my grandfather's support hose.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ... but having the balls to line up at Athens does offset quite a lot
    of fredliness in my book.

    Quoted message said:

    I think somebody needs to come up with a comprehensive fredness rating
    system. I mean, how do things like helmet visors and baggy day-glow
    rain gear fit in?

    It depends.  Maybe there is a cycling activity that requires
    helmet visors, or baggy day-glo vests, or Primal Wear jerseys.
    I can't think of one, but maybe the people with those jerseys
    know.  The key point of fredliness is (in)appropriateness for
    the task at hand.  RBR explains it:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/msg/afd0e321f4181faa

    Ben
    I am now and have always been a Fred.

    That's way to relativistic for me. Some things are just wrong. Like
    visors.

    Joseph

  19. email hidden said:

    I think somebody needs to come up with a comprehensive fredness rating
    system. I mean, how do things like helmet visors and baggy day-glow
    rain gear fit in?

    Joseph

    How about carrying all your water for a hilly 63 mile RR?

  20. Quoted message said:
    email hidden said:

    I think somebody needs to come up with a comprehensive fredness rating
    system. I mean, how do things like helmet visors and baggy day-glow
    rain gear fit in?

    Joseph

    How about carrying all your water for a hilly 63 mile RR?

    That depends, what was the temperature?

    Obtaining all of your hydration from rainwater dripping down your face:
    hardcore.

    Obtaining all of your hydration from sweat wicking off your competitors
    in front of you: hardcore.

    2 bottles in their cages, 3 bottles in your jersey pockets, two more
    over the shoulder blades, 3 down the front of the jersey, 2 down the
    shorts, and 1 between the teeth: hardcore.

    Pretty much everything else: Fred.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.