Assistant Chief Constable thinks speeding is OK

I didn't read very far into that, but parking on the pavement is illegal, and laws should not be
broken in order to enforce others unless absolutely necessary (i.e. someone is guaranteed to die if
said laws aren't broken). In such cases exemptions are generally provided (though they're not
flawless as the donor transport case shows).

I'd have no problem with a fixed camera there mind (assuming the limit was sensible)

In "]news:[email hidden], Danny Colyer <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

I thought I'd forward this quite shocking story that was posted to the Bristol Cycling Campaign
mailing list today:

If you have ever had any dealings with the media you will know that any similarity between the story
and actual events is purely coincidental. I would take any comments with a pinch of skepticism as
the reporter will not have let the facts get in the way of a good story.

OTOH the Police should not be breaking the law to enforce the law and it may be that any motorists
could argue the case as a result.

Tony

--
raven-family.comraven-family.comOpen ↗

"All truth goes through three steps: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed.
Finally, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer

Tony Raven said:

If you have ever had any dealings with the media you will know that any similarity between the
story and actual events is purely coincidental. I would take any comments with a pinch of
skepticism as the reporter will not have let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Oh, I'm well aware of that. And it was, after all, the Daily Mail.

Quoted message said:

OTOH the Police should not be breaking the law to enforce the law and it may be that any motorists
could argue the case as a result.

I'd missed the word 'mobile' when reading it myself. I've never heard of a mobile speed camera. If
it's something that's mounted on a car then fair enough, there's no excuse for parking it on the
pavement. If it's mounted on top of a post or a stand then the positioning seems reasonable from the
description, though of course I haven't seen the picture.

--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( juggler.netdannyOpen ↗ ) Recumbent cycle page:
speedy5.freeserve.co.ukrecumbentsOpen ↗ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine

"Danny Colyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tony Raven said:

If you have ever had any dealings with the media you will know that any similarity between the
story and actual events is purely coincidental. I would take any comments with a pinch of
skepticism as the reporter will not have let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Oh, I'm well aware of that. And it was, after all, the Daily Mail.

Quoted message said:

OTOH the Police should not be breaking the law to enforce the law and it may be that any
motorists could argue the case as a result.

I'd missed the word 'mobile' when reading it myself. I've never heard of a mobile speed camera. If
it's something that's mounted on a car then fair enough, there's no excuse for parking it on the
pavement. If it's mounted on top of a post or a stand then the positioning seems reasonable from
the description, though of course I haven't seen the picture.

I would assume it means a van mounted camera, though there are 'portable' cameras which can be
plugged into sites with pre-installed speed detecting strips (for want of a technical term).

In "]news:[email hidden], Danny Colyer <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

I'd missed the word 'mobile' when reading it myself. I've never heard of a mobile speed camera. If
it's something that's mounted on a car then fair enough, there's no excuse for parking it on the
pavement. If it's mounted on top of a post or a stand then the positioning seems reasonable from
the description, though of course I haven't seen the picture.

They seem to be cropping up a lot recently. You see a police estate car with the tailgate up sat on
the roadside. As you get closer you can see the speed camera inside the back with operator.

Tony

--
raven-family.comraven-family.comOpen ↗

"All truth goes through three steps: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed.
Finally, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer

I passed a white high sided transit on the Sheffield Ring Road last week with surveillance
equipment/speed detection equipment pointing out of the back window. It was parked on the pavement
pointing to where the 30 mph zone started.

"Danny Colyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tony Raven said:

If you have ever had any dealings with the media you will know that any similarity between the
story and actual events is purely coincidental. I would take any comments with a pinch of
skepticism as the reporter will not have let the facts get in the way of a good story.

Oh, I'm well aware of that. And it was, after all, the Daily Mail.

Quoted message said:

OTOH the Police should not be breaking the law to enforce the law and it may be that any
motorists could argue the case as a result.

I'd missed the word 'mobile' when reading it myself. I've never heard of a mobile speed camera. If
it's something that's mounted on a car then fair enough, there's no excuse for parking it on the
pavement. If it's mounted on top of a post or a stand then the positioning seems reasonable from
the description, though of course I haven't seen the picture.

--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( juggler.netdannyOpen ↗ ) Recumbent cycle page:
speedy5.freeserve.co.ukrecumbentsOpen ↗ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine

"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> writed in :"]news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

In "]news:[email hidden], Danny Colyer <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

I'd missed the word 'mobile' when reading it myself. I've never heard of a mobile speed camera.
If it's something that's mounted on a car then fair enough, there's no excuse for parking it on
the pavement. If it's mounted on top of a post or a stand then the positioning seems reasonable
from the description, though of course I haven't seen the picture.

They seem to be cropping up a lot recently. You see a police estate car with the tailgate up sat
on the roadside. As you get closer you can see the speed camera inside the back with operator.

Round here the mobile speed cameras are all in vans. The police estate cars with cameras are looking
for other offences - they are linked to the DVLA computer (with what must be a bl**dy quick link)
and pick up tax dodgers, and car registrations with offenders linked to them. The estate cars are
always linked to a traffic unit further on down the road.

Mike Leicester

"Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Re. mobile speed cameras:

Quoted message said:

They seem to be cropping up a lot recently. You see a police estate car with the tailgate up sat
on the roadside. As you get closer you can see

the

Quoted message said:

speed camera inside the back with operator.

We have a mobile unit in Leicester, basically a white Transit with a camera peeking through the rear
window. It is fully marked as a police "Safety Team" vehicle and it's forthcoming areas of operation
are published in the local rag. Naturally it's generated a lot of communication via the letters page
from all viewpoints. One argument put forward is that it often is parked illegally on pavements
causing outrage to those innocents not aware of their own speed who say the police should get their
own act together. I agree. Leicester may well be the pavement parking capital of England so when
plod set an example by not parking on the pavement they will then be in a position to pursue those
others who do so, this should raise at least as much revenue as the cameras. (Don't you just wish
you carried a camera sometimes. Yesterday I'd have got a good shot of someone driving along the
pavement, no doubt many on uk.tosspot would claim the photo a fake as they resolutely deny this
behaviour occurs 🙂

Personally I think some use of the mobile camera doesn't achieve as much in terms of road safety as
could be achieved if the resources were applied to traffic light cameras, running red lights in
Leicester is now the norm and I always take care if I'm one of the first through green whether in my
car, on my bike or walking. And I'm talking motor vehicles, including buses, not bicycles.

The main artery my road leads onto is one of the hot-spots for trapping speeders with the mobile
unit. It is noticable that the average speed of vehicles appears to have fallen since the unit
has been in operation so to me it appears to be effective and I'd be only too happy to have
permanent cameras there that had a reasonable tolerance to not upset too many people but would
catch the cowboys sometimes doing >50 mph in what is a 30 limit. (And I have witnessed what
appears to be racing).

Morning rant over, Pete.

In "]news:[email hidden], Peter B <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

The main artery my road leads onto is one of the hot-spots for trapping speeders with the mobile
unit. It is noticable that the average speed of vehicles appears to have fallen since the unit has
been in operation so to me it appears to be effective and I'd be only too happy to have permanent
cameras there that had a reasonable tolerance to not upset too many people but would catch the
cowboys sometimes doing >50 mph in what is a 30 limit. (And I have witnessed what appears to be
racing).

The reason it is having an effect is probably because it is mobile and not predictable. People get
to know where the fixed cameras are and slow down just for that section. You can even get GPS
warning units that download data daily from the internet on all fixed camera locations and give
you an in-car count down to the next camera. Mobile cameras foil all that and keep people wary of
their speed.

Tony

--
raven-family.comraven-family.comOpen ↗

"All truth goes through three steps: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed.
Finally, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer

"Danny Colyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I've never heard of a mobile speed camera. If it's something that's mounted on a car then fair
enough, there's no excuse for parking it on the pavement. If it's mounted on top of a post or a
stand then the positioning seems reasonable from the description, though of course I haven't seen
the picture.

The pix were on local news yesterday. The camera was in the back of a hatchback ... the vehicle was
mostly on the pavement but also had wheels on the double yellow lines, and blocking part of the
cycle lane! The officials remarks re speeding remind me of a working lunch a while back where only
one person was drinking alcohol, as the conversation turned to drink driving he was the only one who
could defend it. In fact in his other role as a magistrate he often let drivers off! All the best
Dan Gregory

"Peter B" <[email hidden]> writed in :"]news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

One argument put forward is that it often is parked illegally on pavements causing outrage to
those innocents not aware of their own speed who say the police should get their own act together.
I agree. Leicester may well be the pavement parking capital of England so when plod set an example
by not parking on the pavement they will then be in a position to pursue those others who do so,
this should raise at least as much revenue as the cameras.

Ah! Another Leicester Lad!

The DVLA set up two 'conspicuously clamped' cars to publicise their tax dodging clampdown - just at
the entrance to the Meridian 'Leisure' Park
- aat the slip road leaving Lubbesthorpe Way (A563) - parked slap bank on the cycle route, for at
least two weeks running earlier in the year. Calls to plod on 222 2222 produced a promise of
'action', but guess what?

Mike Leicester Forest East

Dan Gregory said:

The pix were on local news yesterday. The camera was in the back of a hatchback ... the vehicle
was mostly on the pavement but also had wheels on the double yellow lines, and blocking part of
the cycle lane!

OK, Tony and Nathaniel were right then, parking on the pavement is inexcusable. It's still rather
worrying to read a report of a senior police officer who allegedly believes that it is wrong to try
and catch speeding motorists. Catching criminals is, after all, supposed to be his job.

Quoted message said:

The officials remarks re speeding remind me of a working lunch a while back where only one person
was drinking alcohol, as the conversation turned to drink driving he was the only one who could
defend it. In fact in his other role as a magistrate he often let drivers off!

Er, yes, that's rather worrying as well.

--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( juggler.netdannyOpen ↗ ) Recumbent cycle page:
speedy5.freeserve.co.ukrecumbentsOpen ↗ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine

"Danny Colyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

OK, Tony and Nathaniel were right then, parking on the pavement is inexcusable. It's still rather
worrying to read a report of a senior police officer who allegedly believes that it is wrong to
try and catch speeding motorists. Catching criminals is, after all, supposed to be his job.

To be fair, I expect the officer was misquoted, or quoted out of context. The report was from the
Daily Wail, after all!

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

....

Quoted message said:

The pix were on local news yesterday. The camera was in the back of a hatchback ... the vehicle
was mostly on the pavement but also had wheels

on

Quoted message said:

the double yellow lines, and blocking part of the cycle lane!

...

Definitely wrong. Committing offences (or what would be an offence if anyone else did it) to deter
offences is not on. Particularly where it exposes cyclists to greater danger from the possible
offence being monitored.

Rich

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I'd missed the word 'mobile' when reading it myself. I've never heard of a mobile speed camera.
If it's something that's mounted on a car then fair enough, there's no excuse for parking it on
the pavement. If it's mounted on top of a post or a stand then the positioning seems reasonable
from the description, though of course I haven't seen the picture.

They seem to be cropping up a lot recently. You see a police estate car with the tailgate up sat
on the roadside. As you get closer you can see the speed camera inside the back with operator.

That seems a reasonable way to do their checks. Its better than the situation I found in Scotland
last year. It was a quiet main road thru the suburbs, I was heading to the hills with the bike and
was not speeding. A chap stepped out from round a corner and pointed a handgun at me, held in both
hands feet apart. Talk about brown underpants!! I braked hard, undid the seatbelt and was about to
leap out of the car when I saw round the corner behind him. There was a police car close to the wall
and his mate in uniform wearing a yellow police jacket. I parked, walked back to them and visibly
shaking explained the effect their stupidity was having on me. They were stroppy but I got a number
off his collar and eventually got an apology from an Assistant Chief Constable. Mike

In "]news:[email hidden], Taywood <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

A chap stepped out from round a corner and pointed a handgun at me, held in both hands feet apart.
Talk about brown underpants!! I braked hard, undid the seatbelt and was about to leap out of the
car when I saw round the corner behind him.

Had a friend in the US (NJ) who got off a speeding ticket by pleading in his defence that he was in
an area he wasn't familiar with, saw a guy step out and drop a gun on him so he put his foot down
and got the hell out of it as fast as he could. The Court empathised with him.

Tony

--
raven-family.comraven-family.comOpen ↗

"All truth goes through three steps: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed.
Finally, it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer