From: "Mark Probert-March 2, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]>
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: Gallbladder surgery
Quoted message said:
"toby jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>
>
> Why do you stress 'efficacy' rather than 'safety'?
>
> Do you understand that for many who go in search of alternative solutions, safety is far and
> away the more serious concern?
>
> And that for some of them, this is because of having had unfortunate exeriences from within
> the medical system.Yes, the treatment was 100% safe, and the patient died.
Not if the patient's condition was mild, and chronic, rather than at any acute stage.
You may make that distinction, but the charlatans who sell such things a chelation for ASHD, etc.
do not. In those cases, the bodies can pile up.
If you could clarify the situation, briefly, that would be helpful.
Is that a mild, chronic illness?
Who are the people that die, and why?