From: "Mark Probert-March 2, 2004" <Mark [email hidden]>
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: Gallbladder surgery
Quoted message said:
"toby jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>
>
> Why do you stress 'efficacy' rather than 'safety'?
>
> Do you understand that for many who go in search of alternative
> solutions, safety is far and away the more serious concern?
>
> And that for some of them, this is because of having had unfortunate
> exeriences from within the medical system.Yes, the treatment was 100% safe, and the patient died.
Not if the patient's condition was mild, and chronic, rather than at
any acute stage.You may make that distinction, but the charlatans who sell such things a
chelation for ASHD, etc. do not. In those cases, the bodies can pile up.
If you could clarify the situation, briefly, that would be helpful.
Is that a mild, chronic illness?
Who are the people that die, and why?