General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Article about Dreamfields Pasta at eDiets

Started by sh0rtcircuit (Deb) · · Last activity · 7 posts · 402 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 August 2004
Last activity
12 August 2004
Original author
sh0rtcircuit (Deb)
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
402
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.ediets.com/news/article.cfm?cmi=522326&cid=6&code=75960

  2. "sh0rtcircuit (Deb)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.ediets.com/news/article.cfm?cmi=522326&cid=6&code=75960

    My question is what is the validity of using people with a normal
    metabolism?

    <Quote>
    This measure of blood glucose levels comes from in vivo (live people)
    studies.
    A quality control test, Anfinsen said, involved some 45 to 50 people who
    were
    screened as healthy people without any metabolic disorders. Those test
    subjects
    underwent a total of 300 to 400 test runs.
    </Quote>

    Their systems would tend to behave similarly over a large range of carb
    loading.
    Wouldn't it be a better test to use diabetics whose BG levels would be more
    reflective of the amount of carbs they ingested.

    BJ

  3. BJ in Texas said:


    "sh0rtcircuit (Deb)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.ediets.com/news/article.cfm?cmi=522326&cid=6&code=75960

    My question is what is the validity of using people with a normal
    metabolism?

    <Quote>
    This measure of blood glucose levels comes from in vivo (live people)
    studies.
    A quality control test, Anfinsen said, involved some 45 to 50 people who
    were
    screened as healthy people without any metabolic disorders. Those test
    subjects
    underwent a total of 300 to 400 test runs.
    </Quote>

    Their systems would tend to behave similarly over a large range of carb
    loading.
    Wouldn't it be a better test to use diabetics whose BG levels would be more
    reflective of the amount of carbs they ingested.

    BJ


    IMO, they should use subjects from both groups. I'm interested in
    knowing how foods effect me (as a non-diabetic) but I don't monitor
    because I'm not forced to. So the info is potentially helpful in
    deciding whether or not this product might fit into one's woe. I've
    never been much interested in pasta, so I doubt I'll ever buy these
    products. I only posted it as a FYI for those who are or who may be
    considering using it. The article doesn't necessarily reflect any
    opinion of mine.

    Maybe they used normal subjects because previous studies only included
    diabetics? (pure supposition on my part)

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Sh0rtcircuit (Deb)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  4. "sh0rtcircuit (Deb)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Maybe they used normal subjects because previous studies only included
    diabetics? (pure supposition on my part)

    My point and MHO was that in using non-diabetics they could not get
    an accurate measure of the carb impact of the food. If I understand
    correctly, a non-diabetic will produce insulin in sufficent quantities to
    cover a wide range of carb loads and show very little change in BGs.

    BJ

  5. "BJ in Texas" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "sh0rtcircuit (Deb)" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Maybe they used normal subjects because previous studies only included
    diabetics? (pure supposition on my part)

    My point and MHO was that in using non-diabetics they could not get
    an accurate measure of the carb impact of the food. If I understand
    correctly, a non-diabetic will produce insulin in sufficent quantities to
    cover a wide range of carb loads and show very little change in BGs.

    BJ

    I'm not a diabetic and I eat the dreamfields once in while and what I find
    strange is that I don't gain any water weight when consuming it whereas when
    I eat regular pasta, rice, flour etc I gain significant water weight.

    Sid...

  6. Me too. I've eaten the Dreamfields pastas 5 out of the last 7 days and
    have lost 1/2 a pound. No bloating, lethargy, water retention or hunger
    pangs.

    sprudil said:

    I'm not a diabetic and I eat the dreamfields once in while and what I find
    strange is that I don't gain any water weight when consuming it whereas when
    I eat regular pasta, rice, flour etc I gain significant water weight.

    -----
    Bev

  7. Bev-Ann said:

    Me too. I've eaten the Dreamfields pastas 5 out of the last 7 days and
    have lost 1/2 a pound. No bloating, lethargy, water retention or hunger
    pangs.

    Quoted message said:

    on Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:10:32 GMT, "sprudil" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm not a diabetic and I eat the dreamfields once in while and what I find
    strange is that I don't gain any water weight when consuming it whereas when
    I eat regular pasta, rice, flour etc I gain significant water weight.

    This is a classic YMMV food. Just as people react differently to things
    like sugar alcohols, people are going to be reacting differently to
    Dreamfields. But I also think that, given highly individual reactions, it
    isn't necessarily appropriate to extrapolate from the experience of
    diabetics and say, it's good/bad for my LC diet.

    I think most experienced LCers know enough to approach new LC processed
    foods with caution. They know enough to gauge the effect on themselves
    and know if what they're experiencing means the food is not for them.
    Everybody has their own set of symptoms that will resurface if they're
    consuming too many carbs - whether resurge in cravings, allergies,
    digestive problems, sluggishness, brainfog, sleepiness, heartburn, water
    retention, going out of ketosis or weight gain.

    I worry about those just starting LC, though. All the more important to
    counsel people to start off with minimally processed foods until they have
    a better understanding of their own bodies' reactions.

    Dan
    325/211/180
    Atkins since 1/1/02 (yeah, it was a New Year's Resolution)
    Besetting sins: good beer, German bread, and Krispy Kremes

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.