Makes no sense to give up just 7 seconds to your biggest rival on a mountain top finish... either
you stay on the wheel or you lose big time.... Is there is a quiet understanding between LA and
JML... a close race is better for business and the sport!?
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Armstrong keeps race close on purpose?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 19 July 2003
- Last activity
- 19 July 2003
- Original author
- Dt
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 538
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"dt" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Makes no sense to give up just 7 seconds to your biggest rival on a mountain top finish... either
you stay on the wheel or you lose big time.... Is there is a quiet understanding between LA and
JML... a close race is better for business and the sport!?A nice joke, but Armstrong lost 19 sec (7 + 12 bonus sec) to Ullrich.
Now all depends to the (cold and rainy!) weather tomorrow and monday.
MW
-
"dt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Makes no sense to give up just 7 seconds to your biggest rival on a mountain top finish... either
you stay on the wheel or you lose big time....This has to be the stupidest post ever....
-
and liquid excreta "M. Wehrmann" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"dt" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag "]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Makes no sense to give up just 7 seconds to your biggest rival on a mountain top finish...
either you stay on the wheel or you lose big time.... Is there is a quiet understanding between
LA and JML... a close race is better for business and the sport!?A nice joke, but Armstrong lost 19 sec (7 + 12 bonus sec) to Ullrich.
Now all depends to the (cold and rainy!) weather tomorrow and monday.
MW
-
" Tim Mullin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"dt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Makes no sense to give up just 7 seconds to your biggest rival on a mountain top finish...
either you stay on the wheel or you lose big time....This has to be the stupidest post ever....
Plenty of competition the last few days.
-
dt said:
Makes no sense to give up just 7 seconds to your biggest rival on a mountain top finish... either
you stay on the wheel or you lose big time.... Is there is a quiet understanding between LA and
JML... a close race is better for business and the sport!?The climb on the last km wasn't very steep, so Armstrong could get back a few seconds.
-
" Tim Mullin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
This has to be the stupidest post ever....
No, he's right- it's all part of the great French conspiracy.
-
dt said:
Makes no sense to give up just 7 seconds to your biggest rival on a mountain top finish... either
you stay on the wheel or you lose big time.... Is there is a quiet understanding between LA and
JML... a close race is better for business and the sport!?ono if he could smash the field he would, that's what he did in
1999/2000/2001/2002 and what other multiple winners have done.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.