Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Armed & Bent

Started by Joshua Goldberg · · Last activity · 25 posts · 2,198 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
3 March 2003
Last activity
23 March 2003
Original author
Joshua Goldberg
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,198
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–25 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. S&W did make a batch of Mod12s for the French police that had a safety on the right side. It looks
    like a cylinder release. I've never seen a Mod 19 with this feature, although they do have an
    adjustable trigger stop that if adjusted too far out will prevent it from being fired. BTW the new
    S&Ws have a key lock system, it is a small hole above the cylinder release. "Mike O'Brien"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:UBSaa.25457$eG2.3444@sccrnsc03...

    Quoted message said:

    "YourBuddy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Exactly what .357 revolver did you have which was equipped with a


    safety?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You're making this up. I assume the imaginary firearm in question was a revolver, because it's
    impossible to play Russian Roulette with a


    semi-auto.

    Quoted message said:

    Your story is a lie. Try again.

    I had a S&W Model 19 .357 and it had a safety.

    Regards,

    Mike O'Brien

    Trying to keep the barbarians from the gate, but they all have fake
    IDs...

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.459 / Virus Database: 258 - Release Date: 2/25/2003

  2. "YourBuddy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Joshua Goldberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I destroyed the .357 after I walked in on my daughter and one of her girlfriends playing Russian
    Roullete with it. When I took it away I poitned out that if the Safety had not been


    on...one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of them would have been dead.

    Exactly what .357 revolver did you have which was equipped with a safety? You're making this up. I
    assume the imaginary firearm in question was a revolver, because it's impossible to play Russian
    Roulette with a


    semi-auto.

    Quoted message said:

    Your story is a lie. Try again.

    I don't think you'd say that to Joshua's face. And there ARE some revolvers made nowadays with a a
    key-locking device on the hammer mechanism that could be called a "safety" by laymen even though
    that is a technically incorrect term. If memory serves (unlikely at my advanced age) this option is
    offered by Taurus and perhaps by Smith and Wesson. You are correct about Russian Roulette with a
    semi-auto, but you're both half-wrong about the presence of a "safety" on a revolver.

    I would add my two shillings' worth: the only true "safety" exists between the ears of the adult
    responsible for the firearm.

  3. Making this up? Gee maybe I was, my .357 was a L-Frame, 6 inch barrel with a "Safety" Lever on the
    Left side. It also had a Barrel Pin (bought that for added safety). It was not made in the U.S.A., I
    found this out when I called the distributor in the U.S., but I was not aware of that when I bought
    it (I just assumed it was). Sorry I don't have it any longer, otherwise I'd send you the serial #
    and you can see if I'm lying or NOT.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------
    "YourBuddy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Joshua Goldberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I destroyed the .357 after I walked in on my daughter and one of her girlfriends playing Russian
    Roullete with it. When I took it away I poitned out that if the Safety had not been


    on...one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of them would have been dead.

    Exactly what .357 revolver did you have which was equipped with a safety? You're making this up. I
    assume the imaginary firearm in question was a revolver, because it's impossible to play Russian
    Roulette with a


    semi-auto.

    Quoted message said:

    Your story is a lie. Try again.

  4. Here's a guy who attempts to organize the participants of this kind of hijinks.

    winternet.comflame1.html

    rich, still trying to identify a flattering category for myself :^)

  5. [email hidden] (GeoB) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I would not try to use incendary devices against cars. Where I live it is probably at least a
    felony to set someone on fire unless it is self defense against a person who is about to kill
    someone or cause grave bodily injury.

    Yes, of course you are right. I would never do that.

    After I am almost run over by a car whipping in front of me to make a right turn, sometimes I
    think maybe it would help to be respected. They wouldn't do that to a Dump Truck. Maybe if I had
    explosive charges on the end of sticks pointing out everywhere on my bike, painted red or
    sumthin, if they slammed into me or cut me off too close the shaped charge would... oh, you get
    the idea. This is when I am shaking with adrinaline after being almost killed, and the perp
    calmly drives off.

    Quoted message said:

    I have thought the best weapon against cars is something that fries the cars electrical system.

    I think this would be great if it existed. These and similar subsequent posts suggesting this are
    much more balanced than my tongue-in-cheek incendary or explosive device ideas.

    I am not an expert in this area, though I have a BS in micro electronics. I feel that the
    suggestion to use a 'lightning' device would not work. The 'powerful RFI pulse' device might, I
    don't know, but be aware that car electronics are shielded and ruggedized.

    I have always dreamed of a ray gun that would simply weld all metal parts together. They quit
    rolling (suddenly), the doors won't open, the engine is a boat anchor.. the only problem (besides
    technical) is that I want them to KNOW they messed with me and I got em back. Childish, yeah. Like
    the time I was driving at the speed limit up a hill, with some impatient drivers behind me. One
    pulled around me, cursing and flipping me off, breaking the speed limit and passing across a
    double yellow. A cop saw it all and pulled him over farther up the hill. When I cruised past I
    honked, they looked, and I gave a cheery wave.

    But another idea I like: Every driver has a small plastic laser gun. You point it at an offender
    and press the stud, and the Giant Traffic Computer (GTC) notes that car xyz has been accused of
    such-and-such. If the offense is bad enough, and/or enough people 'tag' them in a short while, the
    GTC remotely wrestles control from the driver, disables the engine and parks the car at the
    roadside. The Police Cruiser picks up the offender. It is also possible to indicate the you choose
    to prefer charges against the perp, in more serious cases. Somebody who is habitually discourteous
    and gets tagged a lot can expect to be invited to an 'attitude adjustment' class. When tagged, the
    car's computer stores the current info, speed, throttle setting, acceleration vectors (weaving?
    braking?) and is queried by the GTC. A reckless speeder would be caught.

    Quoted message said:

    Another idea I had is to somehow get a hold of the offending motorists insurance company to let
    them know what kind of drivers they insure.

    I like this idea a lot. Maybe an innovative insurance company would require its drivers to have a
    "How's my driving?" bumper sticker, with a car ID prominently displayed. Sure, maybe there would
    be false alarms but they should be fairly evenly distributed among covered drivers I'd think, and
    could be dealt with statistically.

    How about a handfull of tire spikeswith dispenser :-* DP BIKE-e CT

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.