Paul Boyd said:Tom Crispin said the following on 12/10/2006 22:16:
Quoted message said:That's a far more common reaction than the odd shouted obsenity. Some
National Standard instructors don't like children in reflective tops
for that very reason: it creates an unrealistic road situation. I
think it's a good advert for what we are doing.
I would have thought whether or not it is an unrealistic situation comes
second place to a child's safety.
Regrettably, the effect of bright yellow jackets can greatly affect the
training. The aim of the NS training is to instruct riders in riding safely in
today's *real* road conditions, not in some sanitised false situation.
Correct road positioning, clear signalling and confident riding should make the
need for hi-viz clothing less necessary.
However, I must admit I fall between the two schools of thought on this one,
although if a trainee does not wish to wear a reflective then it will not
necessarily stop the training.
I do get concerned that hi-vis use may go the way of helmets, where insistence
by some trainers and others may result in a move towards compulsion.
The onus of seeing what is ahead should always come before placing the onus on
being seen.
Quoted message said:I wonder if the VW would have waited if the girl was riding in the
gutter? That photo shows quite graphically why a cyclist should be in a
good road position.
How much of the driver's behaviour was a result of the reflective, and how much
was because of the road positioning?
John B