Manufacturers prioritizing profits over durability? Custom builders any better? Just hot air or proof in the pudding? Where's the real-world testing under heavier loads? Industry needs transparency on weight limits & material specs. 
Are there specific bike brands or models known for their durability for larger cyclists?
- Thread starter David1234
- Start date
Is anyone actually pushing for real transparency in the cycling industry? When it comes to weight limits and material specs, where's the accountability? It’s frustrating to see brands touting “heavy-duty” without any solid backing. What about those who’ve had custom builds? Are they genuinely more reliable, or just another marketing ploy? If we’re talking about durability, what kind of real-world scenarios are we looking at? Have any of these bikes been tested under actual conditions that larger cyclists face? Let’s get into the nitty-gritty—what’s the evidence that proves these claims? 
Similar threads
