Your Bloody Soap Box · Public discussion

Arafat the Monster

Started by limerickmin · · Last activity · 24 posts · 1,462 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Your Bloody Soap Box
Published
12 November 2004
Last activity
12 November 2004
Original author
limerickmin
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,462
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Arafat the monster

    By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | November 11, 2004

    YASSER ARAFAT died at age 75, lying in bed surrounded by familiar faces. He left this world peacefully, unlike the thousands of victims he sent to early graves.

    In a better world, the PLO chief would have met his end on a gallows, hanged for mass murder much as the Nazi chiefs were hanged at Nuremberg. In a better world, the French president would not have paid a visit to the bedside of such a monster. In a better world, George Bush would not have said, on hearing the first reports that Arafat had died, "God bless his soul."

    God bless his soul? What a grotesque idea! Bless the soul of the man who brought modern terrorism to the world? Who sent his agents to slaughter athletes at the Olympics, blow airliners out of the sky, bomb schools and pizzerias, machine-gun passengers in airline terminals? Who lied, cheated, and stole without compunction? Who inculcated the vilest culture of Jew-hatred since the Third Reich? Human beings might stoop to bless a creature so evil -- as indeed Arafat was blessed, with money, deference, even a Nobel Prize -- but God, I am quite sure, will damn him for eternity.

    Arafat always inspired flights of nonsense from Western journalists, and his last two weeks were no exception.

    Derek Brown wrote in The Guardian that Arafat's "undisputed courage as a guerrilla leader" was exceeded only "by his extraordinary courage" as a peace negotiator. But it is an odd kind of courage that expresses itself in shooting unarmed victims -- or in signing peace accords and then flagrantly violating their terms.

    Another commentator, columnist Gwynne Dyer, asked, "So what did Arafat do right?" The answer: He drew worldwide attention to the Palestinian cause, "for the most part by successful acts of terror." In other words, butchering innocent human beings was "right," since it served an ulterior political motive. No doubt that thought brings daily comfort to all those who were forced to bury a child, parent, or spouse because of Arafat's "successful" terrorism.

    Some journalists couldn't wait for Arafat's actual death to begin weeping for him. Take the BBC's Barbara Plett, who burst into tears on the day he was airlifted out of the West Bank. "When the helicopter carrying the frail old man rose above his ruined compound," Plett reported from Ramallah, "I started to cry." Normal people don't weep for brutal murderers, but Plett made it clear that her empathy for Arafat -- whom she praised as "a symbol of Palestinian unity, steadfastness, and resistance" -- was heartfelt:

    "I remember well when the Israelis re-conquered the West Bank more than two years ago, how they drove their tanks and bulldozers into Mr. Arafat's headquarters, trapping him in a few rooms, and throwing a military curtain around Ramallah. I remember how Palestinians admired his refusal to flee under fire. They told me: `Our leader is sharing our pain, we are all under the same siege.' And so was I." Such is the state of journalism at the BBC, whose reporters do not seem to have any trouble reporting, dry-eyed, on the plight of Arafat's victims. (That is, when they mention them -- which Plett's teary bon voyage to Arafat did not.)

    And what about those victims? Why were they scarcely remembered in this Arafat death watch?

    How is it possible to reflect on Arafat's most enduring legacy -- the rise of modern terrorism -- without recalling the legions of men, women, and children whose lives he and his followers destroyed? If Osama bin Laden were on his deathbed, would we neglect to mention all those he murdered on 9/11?

    It would take an encyclopedia to catalog all of the evil Arafat committed. But that is no excuse for not trying to recall at least some of it.

    Perhaps his signal contribution to the practice of political terror was the introduction of warfare against children. On one black date in May 1974, three PLO terrorists slipped from Lebanon into the northern Israeli town of Ma'alot. They murdered two parents and a child whom they found at home, then seized a local school, taking more than 100 boys and girls hostage and threatening to kill them unless a number of imprisoned terrorists were released. When Israeli troops attempted a rescue, the terrorists exploded hand grenades and opened fire on the students. By the time the horror ended, 25 people were dead; 21 of them were children.

    Thirty years later, no one speaks of Ma'alot anymore. The dead children have been forgotten. Everyone knows Arafat's name, but who ever recalls the names of his victims?

    So let us recall them: Ilana Turgeman. Rachel Aputa. Yocheved Mazoz. Sarah Ben-Shim'on. Yona Sabag. Yafa Cohen. Shoshana Cohen. Michal Sitrok. Malka Amrosy. Aviva Saada. Yocheved Diyi. Yaakov Levi. Yaakov Kabla. Rina Cohen. Ilana Ne'eman. Sarah Madar. Tamar Dahan. Sarah Soper. Lili Morad. David Madar. Yehudit Madar. The 21 dead children of Ma'alot -- 21 of the thousands of who died at Arafat's command.

  2. limmy, does this mean you still hate jews?

    limerickmin said:

    Arafat the monster

    By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | November 11, 2004

    YASSER ARAFAT died at age 75, lying in bed surrounded by familiar faces. He left this world peacefully, unlike the thousands of victims he sent to early graves.

    In a better world, the PLO chief would have met his end on a gallows, hanged for mass murder much as the Nazi chiefs were hanged at Nuremberg. In a better world, the French president would not have paid a visit to the bedside of such a monster. In a better world, George Bush would not have said, on hearing the first reports that Arafat had died, "God bless his soul."

    God bless his soul? What a grotesque idea! Bless the soul of the man who brought modern terrorism to the world? Who sent his agents to slaughter athletes at the Olympics, blow airliners out of the sky, bomb schools and pizzerias, machine-gun passengers in airline terminals? Who lied, cheated, and stole without compunction? Who inculcated the vilest culture of Jew-hatred since the Third Reich? Human beings might stoop to bless a creature so evil -- as indeed Arafat was blessed, with money, deference, even a Nobel Prize -- but God, I am quite sure, will damn him for eternity.

    Arafat always inspired flights of nonsense from Western journalists, and his last two weeks were no exception.

    Derek Brown wrote in The Guardian that Arafat's "undisputed courage as a guerrilla leader" was exceeded only "by his extraordinary courage" as a peace negotiator. But it is an odd kind of courage that expresses itself in shooting unarmed victims -- or in signing peace accords and then flagrantly violating their terms.

    Another commentator, columnist Gwynne Dyer, asked, "So what did Arafat do right?" The answer: He drew worldwide attention to the Palestinian cause, "for the most part by successful acts of terror." In other words, butchering innocent human beings was "right," since it served an ulterior political motive. No doubt that thought brings daily comfort to all those who were forced to bury a child, parent, or spouse because of Arafat's "successful" terrorism.

    Some journalists couldn't wait for Arafat's actual death to begin weeping for him. Take the BBC's Barbara Plett, who burst into tears on the day he was airlifted out of the West Bank. "When the helicopter carrying the frail old man rose above his ruined compound," Plett reported from Ramallah, "I started to cry." Normal people don't weep for brutal murderers, but Plett made it clear that her empathy for Arafat -- whom she praised as "a symbol of Palestinian unity, steadfastness, and resistance" -- was heartfelt:

    "I remember well when the Israelis re-conquered the West Bank more than two years ago, how they drove their tanks and bulldozers into Mr. Arafat's headquarters, trapping him in a few rooms, and throwing a military curtain around Ramallah. I remember how Palestinians admired his refusal to flee under fire. They told me: `Our leader is sharing our pain, we are all under the same siege.' And so was I." Such is the state of journalism at the BBC, whose reporters do not seem to have any trouble reporting, dry-eyed, on the plight of Arafat's victims. (That is, when they mention them -- which Plett's teary bon voyage to Arafat did not.)

    And what about those victims? Why were they scarcely remembered in this Arafat death watch?

    How is it possible to reflect on Arafat's most enduring legacy -- the rise of modern terrorism -- without recalling the legions of men, women, and children whose lives he and his followers destroyed? If Osama bin Laden were on his deathbed, would we neglect to mention all those he murdered on 9/11?

    It would take an encyclopedia to catalog all of the evil Arafat committed. But that is no excuse for not trying to recall at least some of it.

    Perhaps his signal contribution to the practice of political terror was the introduction of warfare against children. On one black date in May 1974, three PLO terrorists slipped from Lebanon into the northern Israeli town of Ma'alot. They murdered two parents and a child whom they found at home, then seized a local school, taking more than 100 boys and girls hostage and threatening to kill them unless a number of imprisoned terrorists were released. When Israeli troops attempted a rescue, the terrorists exploded hand grenades and opened fire on the students. By the time the horror ended, 25 people were dead; 21 of them were children.

    Thirty years later, no one speaks of Ma'alot anymore. The dead children have been forgotten. Everyone knows Arafat's name, but who ever recalls the names of his victims?

    So let us recall them: Ilana Turgeman. Rachel Aputa. Yocheved Mazoz. Sarah Ben-Shim'on. Yona Sabag. Yafa Cohen. Shoshana Cohen. Michal Sitrok. Malka Amrosy. Aviva Saada. Yocheved Diyi. Yaakov Levi. Yaakov Kabla. Rina Cohen. Ilana Ne'eman. Sarah Madar. Tamar Dahan. Sarah Soper. Lili Morad. David Madar. Yehudit Madar. The 21 dead children of Ma'alot -- 21 of the thousands of who died at Arafat's command.

  3. Someone emailed this to me. I emailed Jeff Jacoby (Boston Globe) thanking him for remembering the truth. While all the world leaders will try and paint a beautiful picture of this man, he is the chief terrorist. I place blame for all the Osama bin Ladens on him. I hope that in the struggle for power as the rival factions clamor for the leadership, that they focus attention on each other and less on the West. But, that's just my opinion.

  4. limerickmin said:

    Arafat the monster


    who is this imposter?

  5. MountainPro said:

    who is this imposter?

    Not sure, but could probably be narrowed down to 4 or five possible individuals.

  6. All is fair...

    As for the burial "procession", if Israel were half as blood thirsty as the fanatics claim, Israel would have launched some kind of attack on the burial crowd. But the blood lust is nothing more than a fabrication in the minds.

  7. jhuskey said:

    Not sure, but could probably be narrowed down to 4 or five possible individuals.


    the imposter? you mean for Lim? I thought it was spelled "Limerickman" (with an a)

    I am confused...😕

  8. Redneck said:

    the imposter? you mean for Lim? I thought it was spelled "Limerickman" (with an a)

    I am confused...😕

    Someone has initiated a new and similar name to Limerickman in order to ......well I am not sure why except for harassment purposes and to post dramatically opposing viewpoints than he would normally post.
    Fairly clever but I am sure he doesn't think so.

  9. jhuskey said:

    Someone has initiated a new and similar name to Limerickman in order to ......well I am not sure why except for harassment purposes and to post dramatically opposing viewpoints than he would normally post.
    Fairly clever but I am sure he doesn't think so.

    Got it... I remember him posting on the Eurosport cycling board, and I thought that posting the story from the Globe was a bit out of character for him. He and I are a little ways apart on the politcal spectrum, but he seems like a decent guy... the real Lim, that is...

  10. Redneck said:

    the imposter? you mean for Lim? I thought it was spelled "Limerickman" (with an a)

    I am confused...😕

    The spelling is pretty close, but limerickmin is from another galaxy.

  11. Weisse Luft said:

    All is fair...

    As for the burial "procession", if Israel were half as blood thirsty as the fanatics claim, Israel would have launched some kind of attack on the burial crowd. But the blood lust is nothing more than a fabrication in the minds.

    Nah, the Israelis have just run out of bullets from shooting old men, women and children. I imagine they're desperately trying to refuel their bulldozers for the next refugee camp levelling effort too. 😉

    While we're keeping score, Sharon has done pretty well himself too. Nearly 4000 dead Palestinians since 2000, and 22 Palestinian children slaughtered within the last month alone. Some of them were shot by the IDF while sitting at their desks in schools. Who can forget the Shatilla and Sabra massacres ?

    It is impossible to take the rants and bleats of Zionist apologists seriously when they persistantly deny and justify crimes against Palestinians.

  12. Redneck said:

    Got it... I remember him posting on the Eurosport cycling board, and I thought that posting the story from the Globe was a bit out of character for him. He and I are a little ways apart on the politcal spectrum, but he seems like a decent guy... the real Lim, that is...


    I remember that during the TDF. The other one was the sausage and beer trailer guy and he was humourous. I rather liked him . This thing is different, Lim knows what to do to get him rubbed out, and I am sure that the other regular posters would be in favour of his removal. What say ye all. Lets keep our polemics untainted.

  13. darkboong said:

    Nah, the Israelis have just run out of bullets from shooting old men, women and children. I imagine they're desperately trying to refuel their bulldozers for the next refugee camp levelling effort too. 😉

    While we're keeping score, Sharon has done pretty well himself too. Nearly 4000 dead Palestinians since 2000, and 22 Palestinian children slaughtered within the last month alone. Some of them were shot by the IDF while sitting at their desks in schools. Who can forget the Shatilla and Sabra massacres ?

    It is impossible to take the rants and bleats of Zionist apologists seriously when they persistantly deny and justify crimes against Palestinians.


    Does that 22 include the ones that blow themselves up?

  14. fixit said:

    The spelling is pretty close, but limerickmin is from another galaxy.

    I actually would probably went for Limrickmon fir the Jamaican flavor.

  15. Don't know who this Limerickmin is - don't really care either to be honest !

    My views are on record.

    Limerickmin ? We'll just have to see what this identity stands for.
    Seems to be on the opposing side though.

  16. darkboong said:

    Nah, the Israelis have just run out of bullets from shooting old men, women and children. I imagine they're desperately trying to refuel their bulldozers for the next refugee camp levelling effort too. 😉

    While we're keeping score, Sharon has done pretty well himself too. Nearly 4000 dead Palestinians since 2000, and 22 Palestinian children slaughtered within the last month alone. Some of them were shot by the IDF while sitting at their desks in schools. Who can forget the Shatilla and Sabra massacres ?

    It is impossible to take the rants and bleats of Zionist apologists seriously when they persistantly deny and justify crimes against Palestinians.

    Proof. You have none in this ranting. I was merely making an observation. You are distorting the facts.

  17. Weisse Luft said:

    All is fair...

    As for the burial "procession", if Israel were half as blood thirsty as the fanatics claim, Israel would have launched some kind of attack on the burial crowd. But the blood lust is nothing more than a fabrication in the minds.

    I'd say General Sharon thought about it - though.
    My question - why didn't the yanks use pre-emptive strikes when Sharon thought about shooting the Palestinians this morning ?
    After all, Whitey, was it because of the alleged pre-emptive strikes which got
    the USA to invade Iraq ?

    Of course there is precedent here, Whitey, isn't there ?
    How's about Lebannon 1982 ?
    Ring any bells yet ?

    Sabra and Shatila.
    General Sharon.

  18. limerickman said:

    I'd say General Sharon thought about it - though.
    My question - why didn't the yanks use pre-emptive strikes when Sharon thought about shooting the Palestinians this morning ?
    After all, Whitey, was it because of the alleged pre-emptive strikes which got
    the USA to invade Iraq ?

    Of course there is precedent here, Whitey, isn't there ?
    How's about Lebannon 1982 ?
    Ring any bells yet ?

    Sabra and Shatila.
    General Sharon.

    Such a putz. Israel has been attacked by all neighbors at least once in the past. Sure, IDF went into Lebanon but only in hot pursuit of terrorists who were attacking CIVILLIANS over the border. Where was the UN then? As such, there have been no arms control sanctions arising from cease fire agreements and ergo, you precedent fails.

    Sharon would never launch an attack on a funeral procession, no matter how tempting the target. Only terrorists that can be identified are elgible for a sniper's projectile. And that sniper could be in a Cobra...

    Oh yes, looks more convincing that Ringo's twin died of the butt flu. Must have shared a few too many goats with his Nigerian brothers. Suha would have nothing of his bockian perversion so she took daughter to Paris where she now lives on a cool 22.8 million a year, paid by the PLO. Cha-Ching! 12 years of marriage to a goat shagger yields 22.8 million a year.

  19. Arafat had a penchant for young boys. Or so goes the rumor. So he probably died from a diseased meat injection.

    It's just a pity it took so long for that [censored] in a Headscarf to croak.

  20. limerickmin said:

    Arafat had a penchant for young boys. Or so goes the rumor. So he probably died from a diseased meat injection.

    It's just a pity it took so long for that [censored] in a Headscarf to croak.

    Wait just a minute...I heard it was kids, not boys 😉 And if it were kids, he must have been getting sloppy seconds from his butt pirate friends!

    Min, you need to send me a PM! I have questions???

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.