JP said:
"Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:What kind of tires are on your MTB? Semi-slicks are much faster than
knobbies.
Quoted message said:You can even use full slicks if your trails are hardpacked. A MTB with
good
Quoted message said:slicks gives up very litte to a road bike, especially if you don't average
more
Quoted message said:than 18 MPH.
I basically disagree with this. For a hardtail with a rigid fork, you
still give up something to a road bike, in terms of weight, geometry,
body position, and gearing. Suspension is a more serious detriment on
the road. All of that adds up to the radical concept that road bikes
(racing or touring varieties) are better when riding on roads.
IMO a rigid-fork mountain bike with slicks is perfect for short commuting,
but not for longer road rides.
Quoted message said:Maxxis Hansventure, 26 X 2.35, front and rear. I run them at
about
Quoted message said:47psi on the trails. I was thinking of getting a matching wheelset and
setting them up with nice fat urban assault tires and switching when I
ride the street but the bike is 37lbs with tools and powerbars and on
the road there is noticeable bob on hills and sometimes acceleration.
Both the suspension and the weight are going to be felt, even getting
slicks.
Quoted message said:Not to say
there isn't any on dirt but I've never noticed it on dirt. My wife and
kids want
me to get a new bike for Xmas (order it anyway) and the pricing isn't a
concern.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:The look and the ruggedness are very appealing. Seems like a bike
that could sail down the driveway and comfortably handle just about
any surface it might encounter. And so Rivendell claims.
Rivendell tends to be a bit over the top in terms of their claims. Lugged
steel frames are not, despite what they say, magic. There are lots of
good road bikes out there, both racing styles and touring bikes.
Rivendale bikes are nice, and do look good. They are expensive, though.
Whether or not you have enough in your budget, still getting value for
your money is a consideration.
Quoted message said:Sorry I didn't make myself clear in my first post. I'm loving my
hollowpoint and not looking to replace it. the only trails I envision
riding with the new bike would be ones I might discover inadvertantly on
a road
trip. I do want a road oriented bike to complement the MTB. Something
that can handle the real roads, crappy cracked seamed roads that
separate the smooth stretches, something I can ride for hours
enjoyably, and for years without wishing I'd bought a "better" bike. Is
that a Riv?
Don't buy based on recommendations here. Check out the options, and
there are many. Are you planning long, unsupported tours? Have an itch
to ride across the country? Then look for a touring-specific bike. If
you just want to take day rides, with maybe someday a tour, then a good
road bike might suit you.
More important than the brand, or frame material, is the fit. If you are
new to road riding, you will find that road bike fit is a more complicated
question than mountain bike fit. You are on the thing for longer
stretches, so comfort is a big deal.
Durability seems to matter to you, so you should avoid the real
stupid-light stuff. This would mean avoiding wheels with very few spokes,
ultra-high-zoot frames made of materials you never heard of, and things
like that.
--
David L. Johnson
__o | If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a
_`\(,_ | conclusion. -- George Bernard Shaw
(_)/ (_) |